Fast-Changing Cactus Flowers Still Point to Design | The Institute for Creation Research

Fast-Changing Cactus Flowers Still Point to Design

Cactus flowers have a striking range in size—they can be smaller than a grain of rice or longer than a school ruler. Such variation points to how God designed living things with room to adapt while also placing limits on what they can become.

A recent Biology Letters study reports that cactus groups with faster-changing flowers tend to form new species faster.1 Jamie Thompson and Chris Venditti studied flower length in more than 750 cactus species. Flower size ranged from 2 millimeters to 37 centimeters.1 That is a 185-fold difference. But flower size itself was not the strongest link to species formation. The University of Reading explained that the key was actually how quickly the flower changed.2

While the authors of the study attribute these changes to evolution, e.g., “the rate of flower-length evolution is a strongly positive predictor [of speciation],” the research instead shows variation in a system that already exists and was designed to diversify.1 Even though the scientists write that “these findings provide insights into the evolutionary origins of plant biodiversity,” it does not show how cactus flowers began or explain the origin of other features already present in the cactus family, like seeds, spines, waxy surfaces that help reduce water loss, water-storing stems, or CAM photosynthesis (a process involving gas-exchange pathways that helps cacti live in dry places).1,3

This is where one must distinguish biological flexibility from biological limits. Cacti can differ in flower length, stem shape, growth form, and habitat. That flexibility helps them live in many settings. But cacti remain cacti. Their main systems still work as cactus systems. From a creation view, this is not surprising. God designed living things with the ability to fill the earth’s many environments.

Although the study depends on a cactus evolutionary family tree and statistical models of change, the work isn’t rendered useless. Models can reveal patterns. But a model can only answer questions within its own starting assumptions. CactEcoDB, the large database behind this work, gathers cactus traits, locations, environments, and family tree data for over 1,000 cactus species.3 These data show patterns of cactus diversity, not that the cactus design was tinkered into existence without the Designer.

An engineering perspective allows us to recognize that living things use control systems. They sense conditions, process information, regulate growth, and produce fitting responses.4 Cactus flower change is but one example of a built-in capacity working within an already-designed system. It is not evidence that unguided processes can build the system itself.

The cactus study is noteworthy because it “challenges a long-standing expectation that the evolution of specialized flowers shapes the rise of plant biodiversity.”1 Moreover, it shows that cacti are not crude desert survivors—they are flexible, complex, and well-fitted to harsh places, able to self-adjust according to their needs. Their differences point to built-in potential, and their core features point to their limitations. Together, those facts are consistent with the workmanship of the Creator.

References

  1. Thompson, J. B. and C. Venditti. 2026. Faster Speciating Cacti Have Faster Evolving Flowers. Biology Letters. 22 (3), article 20250834.
  2. The Cactus on Your Desk Is an Evolution Speed Machine. University of Reading news release. Posted on reading.ac.uk March 18, 2026.
  3. Thompson, J. B. et al. 2026. CactEcoDB: Trait, Spatial, Environmental, Phylogenetic and Diversification Data for the Cactus Family. Scientific Data. 13, article 623.
  4. Guliuzza, R. J. 2019. Biological Networks Feature Finest Engineering Principles. Acts & Facts. 48 (1): 17–19.

* Dr. Corrado earned a Ph.D. in systems engineering from Colorado State University and a Th.M. from Liberty University. He is a freelance contributor to ICR’s Creation Science Update, works in the nuclear industry, and is a Captain in the U.S. Naval Reserve.

The Latest
NEWS
Hot Water, Cracked Rock, but No Life
Could an asteroid impact really spark life? A recent AGU Advances paper says early asteroid impacts might have cracked Earth’s crust and made...

NEWS
Creation Advocate Mike Riddle Goes Home to Be with the Lord
by Randy J. Guliuzza, P.E., M.D., and Jake Hebert, Ph.D.* Following a lengthy illness, Mike Riddle, founder and president of Creation Training Initiative...

NEWS
When DNA Stop Signs Change Their Message
Imagine an intersection where the red stop sign suddenly means, “Right turn only.” Most drivers wouldn’t reach their destinations...

NEWS
August Wallpaper
"The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows His handiwork"  (Psalm 19:1, NKJV) ICR's August 2026...

NEWS
Helium in Exoplanet's Atmosphere: Apparent Evidence of Youth
The prestigious journal Science has published evidence that a planet orbiting a red dwarf star has an atmosphere.1,2 This extrasolar planet,...

CREATION PODCAST
Christian Geologist: I Studied Rocks for 13 Years - What I Found...
Geologist Dr. Tim Clarey spent 13 years digging into rock layers from every continent on Earth, and what he found doesn't match what most people were taught...

NEWS
Giant Fossil Shark Consistent with Extreme Pre-Flood Longevity
Paleontologists recently rediscovered the largest known set of vertebrae from the giant fossil shark Otodus megalodon, popularized by The Meg movies...

NEWS
Faster Chemistry Is Not the Same as Life
A pile of metal, wires, and computer chips will not assemble itself into a working airplane. The parts may have useful properties, but they still need...

NEWS
Fearsome Cleveland Fossil Is Still a Fish
According to evolutionary theory, fish went through a variety of forms until they evolved into the fish we see swimming today. Recently, what conventional...

NEWS
Let the Fossils Speak for Themselves
When conventional scientists call a fossil an early step in animal evolution, the claim may rest more on a reading of the fossil than on the fossil...