Moabite King's Boast Corroborates Genesis | The Institute for Creation Research
Moabite King's Boast Corroborates Genesis

The Moabite Stone was discovered in 1868 in Dibon (Dhiban in modern-day Jordan). Also called the Mesha Stele, it was set in place as a monument by King Mesha of Moab around 830 BC. The stone is not only a reminder that archaeology is riddled with speculation, it also has interesting implications for biblical apologetics.

Recently, a secular archaeologist advocated a new guess about two letters in the Moabite Stone’s inscription.1 Israel Finkelstein used high-resolution photographs to scrutinize damaged portions of Line 31 and decided that an earlier expert, André Lemaire, was wrong. Lemaire reported one part as BT [D]WD.2 Finkelstein speculated that B[??] is correct, which could be BLQ—i.e., Balak, a Moabite king.1

The Moabite Stone corroborates some Old Testament history from a Moabite perspective, specifically the military conflict reported in 2 Kings 3.3,4 Echoing biblical history, King Mesha refers to his home as Dibon (Lines 1-2), the Israelites’ God as YHWH (Line 18), Moab’s god as Chemosh (Lines 4-5, 9, 12), Omri as dynastic head of Israel’s Northern Kingdom (Lines 4-5, 7), and mentions many Moabite place names known to Scripture: Ataroth, Mehdeba, Beth-Baal-Meon, Kiriathen, Nebo, Jahaz, Beth-Diblathain, Beth-Bamoth, Horonain, the Arnon riverbed, etc.

Detail of the Moabite Stone written by Mesha, king of Moab, around 830 BC. (Louvre, Paris.)
Image credit: Copyright © 2012 Mbzt. Used in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holder.

Mesha also boasts success as a “sheep master” (Lines 30-31), although he conveniently omits the embarrassing fact that Moab paid Israel an annual tribute in sheep—literally thousands (see 2 Kings 3:4). Mesha exaggerates like a politician (Line 7), claiming to have destroyed Israel: “destroyed, destroyed forever!”

The king also bragged about defeating the tribe of Gad at Ataroth (Lines 10-13). The Bible, however, designates this and other place names on the stone as the territory of the tribe of Reuben.4 King Mesha designated Ataroth as land of the Gadites, but the Reubenites he never mentioned. Why were the Reubenites ignored, and why were the Gadites recorded with such respect, as if Gadite presence in Reubenite territory was noteworthy to the conquering king?4

The answer lies in Jacob’s prophecy in Genesis 49:1-4, 19. Jacob foretold that Reuben was “unstable as water” and would not excel (v. 4). When Mesha completely ignores Reuben, it corroborates the prophecy about Reuben. Even when Mesha brags about all his conquests in Reubenite territory, he sees no value in bragging about his conquest of Reubenites themselves.

Jacob prophesied about Gad differently: “He shall triumph [‘fight,’ ‘battle’] at last” (v. 19). Gad was a warrior tribe, an aggressive force to be reckoned with. They proved themselves as overcomers, although Gad’s future included some defeats—one of which, at Ataroth, Mesha records in Line 10. When Mesha brags about defeating the warrior Gadites, he verifies Jacob’s prophecy.4

The Moabite Stone is relevant to biblical apologetics. If the new study of Line 31 is correct, it reflects the King Balak referred to in the Bible’s Balaam story (Numbers 22–24). But regardless, the Moabite Stone already substantiates other aspects of biblical history, and even provides unintentional corroboration of fulfillments of Jacob’s prophecies about Reuben and Gad.

References

  1. Finkelstein, I., N. Na’aman, and T. Römer. 2019. Restoring Line 31 in the Mesha Stele: The ‘House of David’ or Biblical Balak? Tel Aviv: Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University. 46 (1): 3-11. “The name on Line 31 [could] be read as Balak, the king of Moab referred to in the Balaam story in Numbers 22–24.”
  2. Lemaire, A. 1994. ‘House of David’ Restored in Moabite Inscription. Biblical Archaeology Review. 20 (3): 30-37.
  3. Johnson, J. J. S. The Moabite Stone, a New Translation, Analytically Cross-Examined in Light of the Bible and Moabite History, pages 23-28, 103-121. Presented to the Evangelical Theological Society conference November 16, 2000, in Nashville, TN.
  4. Johnson, J. J. S. 2014. How the Moabite Stone Corroborates a Prophecy in Genesis 49. Bible and Spade. 27 (3): 68-74, with quotations from page 73.

* Dr. Johnson is Associate Professor of Apologetics and Chief Academic Officer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: James J. S. Johnson, J.D., Th.D. 2019. Moabite King's Boast Corroborates Genesis. Acts & Facts. 48 (7).

The Latest
NEWS
Give Today to Reach the Next Generation
North Texas Giving Day is here once again! Will you help us reach the next generation? Your generosity will empower ICR and the brand-new ICR Discovery...

NEWS
Fossil Ape Skull Is a Game Ender
A recent poll of college-age Americans showed that the single most convincing science-based argument for evolution is the lineup of supposed ape-like evolutionary...

NEWS
Over a Dozen More Dinosaur Soft Tissues
A trio of scientists used sterile techniques to collect 17 dinosaur fossils. They searched deep inside the specimens for original, still-soft tissue...

NEWS
Komodo Dragon Genome Bites Evolution
Komodo dragons are the largest lizards in the world and a top predator on the remote Indonesian islands they inhabit. Their sensory system allows them...

NEWS
ICR Discovery Center Hosts Grand Opening
This Labor Day, over 1,600 people flowed through the ICR Discovery Center for Science & Earth History to celebrate its grand opening. ICR staff and...