Uniformitarians Stumble on Distant Starlight | The Institute for Creation Research

Uniformitarians Stumble on Distant Starlight

The accuracy and authority of God’s Word are often attacked by those who claim that science shows biblical claims to be erroneous if not impossible. 1 Peter 3:15 calls on believers to be always “ready to give a defense [apologian] to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you.” A good place to start is to 1) examine the assumptions of the questioner, and 2) examine closely what the Bible actually says.

For instance, one common stumbling block uniformitarians introduce is the question of how long it took starlight to reach Earth, saying it couldn’t possibly have both started and arrived on Day 4 of the creation week as recorded in Genesis. No human observed or measured the travel time for its original delivery. However, as Dr. Henry Morris observed, we know starlight accomplished God’s declared purposes listed in Genesis 1:14-18, which included starlight being promptly visible to mankind on Earth.

In order to serve these purposes [for the sun, moon, and stars], however, light energy trails would need to be established already in place in space [raqia‘ ] between each star and earth. Thus, men would have been able to see stars billions of light-years away at the very moment of their formation, in accordance with the principle of mature creation, or creation of apparent age.1

Most creationists no longer believe God created starlight “in transit,” but they all agree distant starlight reached Earth quickly. The Hebrew text demands that starlight’s complete transmission first occurred within the timeframe of Day 4. The main action verb in Genesis 1:17—a form of nathan usually translated “give,” more literally “transfer” or “deliver”—emphasizes the original transmission of starlight, not God’s positioning of the stars.2 This means that during Day 4, distant starlight logistically began and completely arrived at (i.e., was “delivered” to) Earth.

As Peter predicted, scoffers say “all things,” including distant starlight, “continue as they were from the beginning of the creation” (2 Peter 3:4), so how could starlight travel countless light-year distances so speedily? Uniformitarians assume that starlight began its intergalactic journey eons ago because they assume distant starlight—even “from the beginning”—has always required billions of years to reach Earth.

God-designed beginnings are not always representative of later continuation norms. Tweet: God-designed beginnings are not always representative of later continuation norms.

Uniformitarians Stumble on Distant Starlight: https://www.icr.org/article/10391

@icrscience

But God-designed beginnings are not always representative of later continuation norms. Consider a human baby’s embryology; it is not representative of how newborn humans grow and develop. Consider the form and behavior of an adult Monarch butterfly; it is not a good “key” for guessing what its earlier caterpillar phase was like.3 Likewise, during the creation week, creation’s processes included many mighty miracles that are not normal today.3,4 Therefore, assuming that evolutionary eons of billions of years of “deep time” are needed for Earth to originally receive starlight is simply wrong—because God transmitted the original starlight by special delivery!

Deists pegged Earth’s years in the millions.
Many stretch that, today, to the billions.
   Dismissing Day 4,
   God’s Word they ignore,
Thus erring by margins of billions.5

References

  1. Morris, H. 2012. The Henry Morris Study Bible. Green Forest, AR: Master Books,11, footnote to Genesis 1:16. The “apparent age” of a mature creation is not deceptive because God gave us an authoritatively true history explaining our origins. Accordingly, if we stumble in the dark about the travel time of distant starlight (or about the true age of creation), we do so only by ignoring the historical facts God reported in Genesis.
  2. Genesis 1:17’s main Hebrew verb nathan (unhelpfully rendered “set” in the NKJV) is translated “give” 1,023 times in the KJV. It is also repeatedly translated “deliver” (e.g., in Genesis 32:16; 40:13; 42:34; 42:37; Deuteronomy 9:10; etc.) In Isaiah 43:9, it is translated “bring forth,” and as “send” in Psalm 68:33 (“He doth send out His voice”); Psalm 77:17 (“the skies send out a sound”); 1 Samuel 12:18 (“the Lord sent thunder and rain”); Song of Solomon 1:12 (“my spikenard sendeth forth the smell”); etc. The core meaning of nathan is the action of transfer or delivery, such as the transmission of starlight in Genesis 1:17.
  3. Creation was not affected by the Curse until after Adam sinned (see Genesis 3 and Romans 8). So, although the laws of physics were probably operating much as they do today, God likely would have supernaturally upheld (i.e., secured the orderliness of) His creation to a greater extent before the Curse than He does now (Hebrews 1:3) so that the then-perfect creation (including all life on Earth) was not negatively affected. After Adam sinned, God may have simply withdrawn His hand, allowing disobedient humans (and the living creatures God had entrusted to their stewardship—see Romans 8:20-22) to experience what we now call “entropy,” the ubiquitous tendency toward disorder and decay that God had previously prevented.  See Johnson, J. J. S. 2014. Is the Present the “Key” to Our Past? Acts & Facts. 43 (6): 19.
  4. See DeYoung, D. B. 2010. Mature Creation and Seeing Distant Starlight. Journal of Creation. 24 (3): 54-59. If we wrongly assume that distant starlight requires billions of years to reach us, even on Day 4 of the creation week, we err by committing the uniformitarian fallacy. 
  5. Quoting from an original limerick by J. J. S. Johnson presented with “Deism Then and Now, A Comparative Review” at the Southwest Regional Conference of the Evangelical Theological Society (Fort Worth, Texas, March 9, 2012).

* Dr. Johnson is Associate Professor of Apologetics and Chief Academic Officer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: James J. S. Johnson, J.D., Th.D. 2018. Uniformitarians Stumble on Distant Starlight. Acts & Facts. 47 (1).

The Latest
NEWS
Even Sherlock Holmes Can’t Explain African Dinosaurs
A new species of duck-billed dinosaur, Ajnabia odysseus, was recently unearthed in North Africa.1 This is the first hadrosaur-type dinosaur...

NEWS
Glow-in-the-Dark Platypuses Illuminate the Creator
The platypus is perhaps the most evolution-defying creature on Earth. It’s not enough that it’s a mammal that lays eggs, has a bill like a...

NEWS
Rapid Crystal Growth Supports Flood Model
Secular scientists are finding exactly what Flood geologists have predicted all along—huge crystals can and did grow extremely fast. In other words,...

NEWS
Hot Neptune Atmosphere "Shouldn't Exist"
An exoplanet 260 light-years away is being described as the first of its kind ever detected.1,2 This exoplanet, catalogued as LTT 9779b, is...

NEWS
Inside November 2020 Acts & Facts
Where can we see God’s engineering? What is ICR’s new scientific theory? How do hummingbirds reveal God’s design? How can you refute...

ACTS & FACTS
Thankful Remembrance
We all have so much to be thankful for. Even after such a trying year, we must admit that God has been so very good to us. The Lord has not only shown...

APOLOGETICS
Mayflower Pilgrims, Simian DNA, and Straw Men
Both the Mayflower Pilgrims and biblical creationists are unjustly targeted for straw man vilifications using misleading, false accusations. A straw...

ACTS & FACTS
How Can You Refute Evolution?
Darwinian evolution promotes a mantra that “all creatures great and small—natural processes made them all.” Just one creature somehow...

ACTS & FACTS
Hummingbirds by Design
Zoologists have wonder and appreciation for the animals they investigate, whether the creatures fly through air, swim in water, or walk on land. Stanford...

ACTS & FACTS
Science vs. Falsely Called Knowledge
Guard what was committed to your trust, avoiding the profane and idle babblings and contradictions of what is falsely called knowledge—by professing...