Cell Division Research Discovers Sugar 'Safety Switch' | The Institute for Creation Research
Cell Division Research Discovers Sugar 'Safety Switch'

At a very basic level, the maintenance and reproduction of a living organism depend on the division of its cells. How does a cell “know” when or why to begin the division process, or even how to go about it? Research has revealed that the answers are complicated, and a recent breakthrough may add even more questions.

Under a microscope, cell division looks like a straightforward biological process. One cell seemingly just splits into two. But there is actually much more to it. After all, the two new resulting cells have to have all the needed parts that the original had―a copy of every DNA, protein, RNA, and other molecules―as well as at least one whole organelle for each.

How does the communication and transportation of these thousands of parts occur with such integrity and regularity in living things? In a report published in the journal Science Signaling, researchers from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the University of Virginia have confirmed that not only are proteins and phosphates involved in the cell division’s internal communication, but so are certain sugars. Since most cellular investigative techniques rely on molecular characteristics such as size and charge, sugars—which are small and often have no charge—have been difficult to study.

By clever sleuthing, these biochemists discovered that a certain sugar can block a common chemical reaction involving phosphates and proteins. Only when the sugar is removed from the vicinity can the reaction take place, and only then does the protein activate to perform its function in cell division.

The reaction that occurs when an enzyme adds a phosphate to a protein is called “phosphorylation.” A separate enzyme can add the sugar, called “O-GlcNAc,” to the same or a nearby site on that protein, and this prevents the phosphate from being added there. Study co-author Gerald Hart said in a Johns Hopkins press release, “I think of phosphorylation as a micro-switch that regulates the circuitry of cell division, and O-GlcNAcylation as the safety switch that regulates the microswitches.”1

Further, these sugars act not as “on-off” switches, but rather more like “dimmer” switches. This way, the protein activity that coordinates, latches onto, and transports parts within the cell can be constantly fine-tuned during cell division.

It seems that just when scientists and educators think they have grasped how cells operate, they discover a whole new dimension that must be taken into account. The John Hopkins press release concluded that “the new sugar switches reveal that the cellular circuitry is much more complex than previously thought.”1

Considering the engineering required for the myriad cell parts, communication networks, and regulating switches that have been operating faithfully and continuously since the beginning of creation, only a supernatural Builder could be responsible for their existence. With each new dimension of interdependent components, the specified complexity operating in cells requires a renewed appreciation for the ingenuity of their Creator.

References

  1. Sweet!―Sugar Plays Key Role in Cell Division. Johns Hopkins Medicine press release, February 5, 2010, reporting research in Wang, Z., et al. 2010. Extensive Crosstalk Between O-GlycNAcylation and Phosphorylation Regulates Cytokinesis. Science Signaling. 3 (104): ra2.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on February 18, 2010.

The Latest
ACTS & FACTS
Continuous Environmental Tracking : An Engineering-Based Model...
Purpose The Institute for Creation Research is engaged in our biggest science initiative in the last two decades, and it could be our most important...

ACTS & FACTS
CET: Testing the Cavefish Model
Staff Writer Purpose The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is testing an engineering- based model of rapid biological adaptation called...

ACTS & FACTS
Original Biochemistry in Fossils
Purpose In 1997, paleontologist Dr. Mary Schweitzer accidentally stumbled upon what appeared to be blood vessels and blood cells from a T. rex...

ACTS & FACTS
Debunking an Iconic Uniformitarian Ice Age Theory
Purpose The Milankovitch, or astronomical, theory holds that the timing of Ice Ages is controlled by slow changes in Earth’s orbital and...

ACTS & FACTS
ICR and Explaining the Ice Age
Purpose There is strong geological evidence for an Ice Age, so the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) has always been interested in explaining...

ACTS & FACTS
Planetary Magnetism
Purpose In 1971, Dr. Thomas Barnes publicized a then “trade secret” of scientists studying the earth’s magnetic field, which...

ACTS & FACTS
Cosmology Research
Purpose Taking the Hebrew text of Scripture at face value without inserting gaps or revising the meanings, the universe is only about 6,000 years...

ACTS & FACTS
The Coconino Sandstone: Water, not Wind
Purpose The Coconino Sandstone is one of the most well-known formations in Grand Canyon. The blond-colored sandstone, just three layers down from...

ACTS & FACTS
Global Stratigraphy Supports a Progressive Worldwide Flood
Purpose Is there geological evidence for a global flood? Is there evidence that the waters rose and peaked on Day 150 as recorded in Genesis 8?...

ACTS & FACTS
Human-Chimp DNA Similarity Research Refutes Evolution
Purpose An oft-repeated claim of evolutionary propaganda is that the DNA of chimpanzees and humans is 98.5% identical. This high level of DNA...