Are Creationists Conspiracy Theorists? | The Institute for Creation Research
Are Creationists Conspiracy Theorists?
Paul Braterman, emeritus professor of chemistry at the University of Glasgow, recently claimed online that creationism “meets all the criteria” for a “conspiracy theory.” He says creationism offers “a complete parallel universe with its own organisations and rules of evidence, and [creationism] claims that the scientific establishment promoting evolution is an arrogant and morally corrupt elite.”1,2 Is this fair?

First, we should note that calling someone a “conspiracy theorist” is a quick and easy way to avoid having to deal with the intellectual arguments for his position. It is tantamount to calling him crazy. And we all know that attempting to reason with crazy people is pointless, right?

Braterman says creationists demonize evolutionists, and he cites, presumably as evidence of this, former Georgia Congressman Paul Broun’s much-publicized 2012 claim that evolution is a lie “straight from the pit of hell”.3 But if one watches the YouTube video of Congressman Broun embedded in Braterman’s essay, he doesn’t personally attack evolutionists.1, 2 He simply stated his belief (which we share) that evolution is a false doctrine, and like all false doctrines, it ultimately originates from Satan, the father of lies.4 That is not a personal attack on evolutionists, and it does not mean that all evolutionists are intentionally lying. But it does mean that the theory evolutionists hold ultimately originated with an evil being who intends both us and them harm. Broun’s statement reflects on the deceit and not on the persons being deceived.

In passing, some online news outlets unfairly claimed that Broun rejected embryology, as well as evolution.5, 6 Congressman Broun is a medical doctor. Broun was not objecting to embryology as a science per se, but he was alluding to Ernst Haeckel’s fraudulent argument (still repeated even in modern textbooks!7) that embryos recapitulate the supposed evolutionary history of their species while in the womb. The outrageous extent of the fraud behind this 19th century argument for evolution was dramatically demonstrated in 1997 by embryologist Michael Richards. He published actual photos of the embryos Haeckel used and compared those photographs with Haeckel’s embryo drawings. I encourage you to view these photographs for yourself.8

It may be going too far to say that Braterman is demonizing creationists, but he certainly assumes evil in our motives. He claims creationism is a “deep-seated power struggle” between religious conservatives and liberals, suggesting that creationists don’t really believe what we profess and that we are unconcerned about evidential truth. He suggests that creationists are motivated by financial interests when he describes one particular creation exhibit, without any evidence, as “highly lucrative.”1, 2

His claim that creationists operate by different rules of evidence is unfounded. You don’t convert skeptics to your position by inventing your own unique rules of evidence! Yet former skeptics are being converted both to creationism and Christianity by the sheer strength of the logic and evidence for biblical creation. However, we freely admit our philosophical presuppositions: we believe without apology that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God. Braterman also has his own worldview assumptions. He is a member of the National Center for Science Education,1, 2 which is extremely hostile to the creation movement, and this is not the first time that he has publicly denounced the creationist movement.9 Has Dr. Braterman considered the possibility that his own presuppositions might be coloring the way he looks at the evidence?

The entire essay is basically a giant ad hominem attack on creationists. It is instructive that this essay doesn’t attempt to answer creationists with any scientific evidence for evolution. Perhaps that’s because there isn’t any.

1. Braterman, P. Why creationism bears all the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory. The Conversation. Posted on February 4, 2021, accessed February 9, 2021.
2. Braterman, P. Why creationism bears all the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory. Snopes. Posted on February 4, 2021, accessed February 10, 2021.
3. Henry, R. Georgia congressman finds himself in brouhaha over evolution, other theories in science. The Florida Times-Union Jacksonville. Posted October 17, 2012 at, accessed February 10, 2021.
4. John 8:44.
5. Young, M. Paul Broun Calls Evolution and Embryology “Lies from the Pit of Hell”. Mic. Posted on February 6, 2013, accessed February 10, 2021.
6. Williams, M. Republican Congressman Paul Broun dismisses evolution and other theories. The Guardian. Posted October 6, 2012 at, accessed February 11, 2021.
7. Luskin, C. Haeckel’s Fraudulent Embryo Drawings Are Still Present in Biology Textbooks – Here’s a List. Evolution News and Science Today. Posted April 3, 2015 at, accessed February 10, 2021.
8. Niekerk, E. van. 2011. Countering revisionism – part 1: Ernst Haeckel, fraud is proven. Journal of Creation 25 (3): 89-95.
9. Hebert J. Professor Says He Can “Slam Dunk” Creationists. Creation Science Update. Posted September 21, 2017 at, accessed February 11, 2021.

*Dr. Jake Hebert is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Texas at Dallas.
The Latest
Continuous Environmental Tracking : An Engineering-Based Model...
Purpose The Institute for Creation Research is engaged in our biggest science initiative in the last two decades, and it could be our most important...

CET: Testing the Cavefish Model
Staff Writer Purpose The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is testing an engineering- based model of rapid biological adaptation called...

Original Biochemistry in Fossils
Purpose In 1997, paleontologist Dr. Mary Schweitzer accidentally stumbled upon what appeared to be blood vessels and blood cells from a T. rex...

Debunking an Iconic Uniformitarian Ice Age Theory
Purpose The Milankovitch, or astronomical, theory holds that the timing of Ice Ages is controlled by slow changes in Earth’s orbital and...

ICR and Explaining the Ice Age
by Larry Vardiman, Ph.D., and Michael J. Oard, M.S.* Purpose There is strong geological evidence for an Ice Age, so the Institute for Creation...

Planetary Magnetism
Purpose In 1971, Dr. Thomas Barnes publicized a then “trade secret” of scientists studying the earth’s magnetic field, which...

Cosmology Research
Purpose Taking the Hebrew text of Scripture at face value without inserting gaps or revising the meanings, the universe is only about 6,000 years...

The Coconino Sandstone: Water, not Wind
Purpose The Coconino Sandstone is one of the most well-known formations in Grand Canyon. The blond-colored sandstone, just three layers down from...

Global Stratigraphy Supports a Progressive Worldwide Flood
Purpose Is there geological evidence for a global flood? Is there evidence that the waters rose and peaked on Day 150 as recorded in Genesis 8?...

Human-Chimp DNA Similarity Research Refutes Evolution
Purpose An oft-repeated claim of evolutionary propaganda is that the DNA of chimpanzees and humans is 98.5% identical. This high level of DNA...