Ancient Animal Biochemicals Again | The Institute for Creation Research

Ancient Animal Biochemicals Again

Dozens of technical reports show original biochemistry within the bodies of long-buried fossils, and the reports just keep coming. Three new reports give occasion to reconsider the age assignments for all these fossils. After all, none of them comes with a death-date label. But the biochemicals they harbor resemble timers that should have elapsed long ago unless these fossils were deposited thousands of years ago, not millions.

The biochemicals they harbor resemble timers that should have elapsed long ago unless these fossils were deposited thousands of years ago, not millions. Tweet: The biochemicals they harbor resemble timers that should have elapsed long ago unless these fossils were deposited thousands of years ago, not millions.

Ancient Animal Biochemicals Again: https://www.icr.org/article/10379/

@icrscience @icrbthomas

First, researchers describe original fat in a fossilized bird gland from Germany’s Messel Shale. Today’s birds use preening glands near their tails to treat their feathers with a weather-proofing oil. Without the gland, a neck flexible enough to reach the gland, an adequate beak to collect the gland’s lubricant, and the instinct to preen feathers, then a bird’s feathers would get misshapen, dry, and cracked, making flight impossible.

Deemed “the oldest lipids ever recovered from a vertebrate,” the still-yellow oil-making gland suffers a “48 million year” label.1 Lipids include fats and oils. Why didn’t bacteria reach and devour it in all that supposed time?2

For the second fossil find, an international team of paleontologists described original pigments in a turtle fossil from the Eocene Fur Formation in Denmark. The study authors wrote,

The preserved organics represent condensed remains of the cornified epidermis and, likely also, deeper anatomical features, and provide direct chemical evidence that adaptive melanism—a biological means used by extant sea turtle hatchlings to elevate metabolic and growth rates—had evolved 54 million years ago.3

They did, indeed, find direct evidence of pigments. They used immunohistochemistry and electron microscope-based elemental analysis to confirm that the fossil’s dark exterior came from the same biochemical that makes up living baby turtles’ dark skin. But they could not have found direct evidence that “adaptive melanism…had evolved,” since they did not directly see it evolve. Their conclusion appears to be a speculation based on an assumption. This fully pigmented baby turtle appears in its completed form, just like modern turtles, with no evolutionary process in sight.

Nor did the fossil convey “direct chemical evidence” of 54 million years. That’s impossible. Science cannot directly measure the age of any artifact. The best science can do is to use a proxy for age—some process with a regular decay rate—and assume that the specimen being dated has been decaying the same way in the past.4 For example, biochemicals decay at regular rates under ideal conditions. They can last thousands of years, but not a million, and certainly not 54 million.

Nor did the fossil convey “direct chemical evidence” of 54 million years. That’s impossible. Science cannot directly measure the age of any artifact. Tweet: Nor did the fossil convey “direct chemical evidence” of 54 million years. That’s impossible. Science cannot directly measure the age of any artifact.

Ancient Animal Biochemicals Again: https://www.icr.org/article/10379/

@icrscience @icrbthomas

Third and last, German and American researchers extracted the two main pigments known to add color to modern bird eggs from fossil eggs. The team “reliably identified” biliverdin and protoporphyrin in Cretaceous fossil eggs from three separate locations across China. They determined the eggs were originally turquoise in color. The fossil pigments even had the same exact molecular mass as modern standard pigments, as though almost no degradation had occurred. But how could that be true after “at least 66 million years?”5

As though they heard that very question, another group led by University of Manchester researchers admitted earlier this year that biochemicals could not possibly last that long. Their report, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, argued that proteins sequenced from dinosaurs could possibly reflect lab contaminants.6 The study authors wrote,

Schweitzer et al. reported [Science, 2005, 307:1952] on the startling discovery of soft-tissue preservation in the femur of a Tyrannosaurus rex, apparently preserved for over 68 Myr, a length of time vastly greater than thought possible given the experimentally measured rates of decay for the component structural proteins, particularly collagen.6

Protein decay experiments have determined 68 million years as a length of time “vastly greater than thought possible” for proteins to last. Their solution to this dilemma was to claim contamination, despite the difficulties that story raises. Contamination would require a highly unlikely scenario: Detection devices from several different labs somehow all retained enough residual protein from prior samples even after the standard thorough washing procedures for the high-tech equipment. Plus, what are the odds that each of those supposedly contaminant samples just happened to mimic likely dinosaur protein sequences? In the end, protein contamination can’t explain lipids and pigments either.

Biochemicals decay at regular rates under ideal conditions. They can last thousands of years, but not a million, and certainly not 54 million. Tweet: Biochemicals decay at regular rates under ideal conditions. They can last thousands of years, but not a million, and certainly not 54 million.

Ancient Animal Biochemicals Again: https://www.icr.org/article/10379/

@icrscience @icrbthomas

Secular paleontologists make good observations of original biochemicals in fossils, but they have great difficulty convincing other scientists that such fragile materials could last millions of years. On the other hand, those who claim contamination must explain scores of original biochemicals from scores of fossils from all over the world and the dozen or so different high-tech lab techniques that have repeatedly verified those finds for dozens of years.7

One harmonious resolution seems to evade all these secular researchers. If these fossils were deposited thousands of years ago, not millions, then experiments confirm they could still carry original biochemicals, and observations confirm that some actually do still carry remnants of their ancient carcasses.

References

  1. Micu, A. Researchers discover astonishingly intact, 48-million-year-old bird fats in fossilized gland. ZME Science. Posted on zmescience.com October 19, 2017, accessed October 25, 2017.
  2. Clarey, T. 2014. Rapidly Forming Oil Supports Flood Timeframe. Acts & Facts. 43 (3).
  3. Lindgren, J. et al. 2017. Biochemistry and adaptive colouration of an exceptionally preserved juvenile fossil sea turtle. Scientific Reports. 7: 13324.
  4. Lisle, J. 2017. Creation 101: Radiometric Dating and the Age of the Earth. Biblical Science Institute. Posted on biblicalscienceinstitute.com October 27, 2017, accessed October 30, 2017.
  5. Wiemann, J. et al. Dinosaur origin of egg color: oviraptors laid blue-green eggs. PeerJ. 5:e3706.
  6. Buckley, M. et al. 2017. A fossil protein chimera; difficulties in discriminating dinosaur peptide sequences from modern cross-contamination. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 284 (1855): 201750544.
  7. Thomas, B. 2015. Original Biomaterials in Fossils. Creation Research Society Quarterly. 51: 234-247.

*Brian Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his M.S. in biotechnology from Stephen F. Austin State University.

Stage image: "48-million-year-old" bird fats in fossilized gland.

Stage image credit: Copyright © O'Reilly, S. et al. Used in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders

Article posted on December 7, 2017.

The Latest
NEWS
No Evidence T. rex Hatchlings Had Feathers
The recent discovery of a tiny tyrannosaur jaw bone fragment and a claw has some scientists again pushing dinosaurs as birds.1 But is there...

NEWS
Inside March 2021 Acts & Facts
Why does ICR uphold the clarity of Scripture? How do we know that canyons were formed by the Genesis Flood? How do fossilized fish confirm biblical...

DAYS OF PRAISE DEVOTIONALS
Spring 2021
...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Human Hands
You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with ICR’s special Creation Kids learning...

ACTS & FACTS
Dross and Dilution
The first of seven great signs of Jesus’ deity recorded in John’s gospel is the wedding in Cana of Galilee (John 2:1-11). By the time Jesus...

APOLOGETICS
Do the Unpersuaded Have Enough Proof?
At a local Bible conference, a respected seminary professor unintentionally contradicted the apostle Paul. During the Q&A session, he opined that...

ACTS & FACTS
Gunnison's Black Canyon: The Flood Solves Mysterious Missing...
Brian Thomas, Ph.D., and Tim Clarey, Ph.D. The Gunnison River winds westward from the Colorado Rocky Mountains through dry and dramatic landscapes....

ACTS & FACTS
Do We See Complex Design in Mosquito Eggs?
Mosquitoes hatch from tiny eggs and spend a few days filter-feeding on things like bacteria, pollen, and algae. They molt three times as they grow,...

ACTS & FACTS
A Texas-Size Spider Mystery
The delightfully creepy spider belongs to a class called Arachnida—which is distinct from the “bug” class Insecta. Not surprisingly,...

ACTS & FACTS
The Fossils Still Say No: The Fins-to-Feet Transition
One of the alleged greatest transformations in vertebrate evolution is said to be the emergence of creatures that traded fins for feet and transitioned...