Convergent Evolution or Design-Based Adaptation? | The Institute for Creation Research

Convergent Evolution or Design-Based Adaptation?

Convergent evolution is the idea that the same trait, or set of traits, in completely different organisms were somehow produced through independent evolutionary processes. Now a new study shows how two different types of snakes have adapted to a diversity of environments by expressing the same traits (skin color and skull shape), but the study describes no mechanism for it. The authors simply attribute the highly repeatable process to the mysterious black box of convergent evolution.1

Although both constrictors, pythons and boas are two different types of snakes that evolutionists believe share a common ancestor in the mid-late Cretaceous about 63-96 million years ago during the last alleged age of the dinosaurs.2 Many creationists maintain that pythons and boas are simply different created kinds. A common design explains much of the same genetic programming for some traits since the snakes' lifestyles and habits are similar. However, there are many fundamental differences between them. For example, boas bear live young while pythons lay eggs.

Contrary to popular opinion, both creationists and evolutionists recognize that a fundamental type of organism can diversify and fill different ecological niches. In scientific literature this is referred to as speciation or adaptive radiation. Many evolutionists study this common biological phenomenon and then claim it as proof for molecules-to-man evolution. The problem is that while a creature's traits exhibit diversity based upon the genetic variability of the original creature, the basic organism never changes into anything fundamentally different because of its pre-existing genetic boundaries—the creature simply cannot evolve. In the case of pythons and boas, despite the genetic variability they exhibit when they diversify, they still fundamentally remain pythons and boas.

In this most recent study, scientists investigated boas and pythons that inhabited five different ecological niches: fossorial (digging and living underground), semi-fossorial, semi-aquatic, terrestrial, and semi-arboreal (living in trees part of the time). They found that the colors of the snake's skin and skull morphology (size and shape of the head) were similar for both boas and pythons (See Figure 1) in each of the different ecological niches. They state, "This demonstrates that burrowing species have broader and shorter heads with smaller eyes, whereas the other guilds (eco-types) have thinner and longer heads with larger eyes."

So, did the same mindless evolutionary processes produce the same type of snake speciation in both pythons and boas, or is there a much better explanation? We know from the book of Genesis that not only did God create every creature after their kind, but that He also created built-in programs along with ample genetic diversity that enables them to robustly speciate so they can fill and populate the earth in a variety of ecological niches. Rather than invoking the magic phrase "convergent evolution," it is considerably more rational to ascribe this level of masterful engineering and programming to an omnipotent and all-wise Creator.

References

  1. Esquerré, D. and J. S. Keogh. 2016. Parallel selective pressures drive convergent diversification of phenotypes in pythons and boas. Ecology Letters. 19 (7): 800–809.
  2. Zheng, Y. and J. J. Wiens. 2016. Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Mol. Phylogenetics and Evolution. 94 (Pt B): 537–547. 

*Dr. Tomkins is Director of Life Sciences at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in genetics from Clemson University.

Article posted on July 7, 2016.

The Latest
ACTS & FACTS
Novel Orphan Genes Aid in Regulated Adaptation
Orphan genes (OGs) are genes that are unique to a specific kind of creature. This is especially significant when creatures that are considered evolutionary...

ACTS & FACTS
Sickle Cell Research Confirms TOBD Prediction: Directed Genetic...
Students of the creation-evolution debate know the changing explanations for how creatures originated and operate. Originally, the great minds of most...

NEWS
A New Year's Resolution
“For I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.” (1 Corinthians 2:2) When Paul first entered...

NEWS
The Lord Jesus: The Gift of Christmas
“Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,...

NEWS
Garments for the King
“All thy garments smell of myrrh, and aloes, and cassia, out of the ivory palaces, whereby they have made thee glad.” (Psalm 45:8) One...

NEWS
Bold Claim, Hidden Design: What Salterella Reveals About Early...
What if a fossil no bigger than a grain of rice showed engineering so precise that it still puzzles scientists? That is the intrigue surrounding Salterella,...

CREATION PODCAST
Black Holes are BREAKING the Big Bang! | The Creation Podcast:...
Space is full of some of the strangest and most breath-taking objects in existence. Among them, black holes sit right at the top of the list. They're...

NEWS
Where Did Most of Earth's Species Come From?
Evolutionary naturalism is locked into seeing the entire living world as having evolved from a single common ancestor many millions of years ago.1...

NEWS
A Molecular Snowmobile
People following—or actively involved in—creation science are no doubt aware of the incredible molecular motor called the flagellum,1,2...

NEWS
Rhino Fossil Requires the "Impossible" from Conventional...
A recent study published in Nature Ecology & Evolution claims that the “impossible” actually happened—not just once, but three...