Fossil Footprints Fit Flood Ice-Age Model | The Institute for Creation Research
Fossil Footprints Fit Flood Ice-Age Model
Anthropologists Thomas Urban (Cornell University) and Daron Duke (Far Western Anthropological Research Group) recently found preserved human footprints on an Air Force testing range located on the salt flats of Utah.1 These footprints are called “ghost tracks” because they are very hard to see except after rainfall when moisture can make them visible. Ground-penetrating radar revealed the presence of even more impressions for a total of 88 footprints.

Both creationist and uniformitarian scientists agree that these tracks were made during the Ice Age, although they disagree about when the Ice Age occurred. Creationists think these footprints are just a few thousand years old. However, evolutionists think the tracks are more than 10,000 years old, because they believe the wet conditions needed to form and preserve the footprints have been absent from the Great Salt Lake area for at least that long.

Duke described the human footprints in an Air Force press release:

People appear to have been walking in shallow water, the sand rapidly infilling their print behind them—much as you might experience on a beach—but under the sand was a layer of mud that kept the print intact after infilling.1

The Utah tracks are similar to other human footprints preserved in White Sands National Park, New Mexico, where tracks were formed on the edges of what was once a shallow lake.2 They form a 1.5 kilometer-long (0.9 mile) trail, the longest trail of fossilized human footprints known to exist. Like the Utah tracks, the New Mexico tracks were made at a time when White Sands was wet enough for the tracks to be formed in soft sediment. These tracks are also thought to have been made during or near the end of the Ice Age.2 In fact, other human and animal Ice Age tracks have been discovered in Australia,3 Canada,4 South Africa,5 Chile,6 and Saudi Arabia.7

Clearly, modern desert areas were much wetter during at least some parts of the Ice Age, and the creationist Ice-Age model offers a better explanation. Although mainstream geologists claim there have been many ice ages, there is strong geologic evidence for only one ice age.8 Creation scientists think the Ice Age was the direct result of the Genesis Flood approximately 4,500 years ago. ICR scientists think rapid seafloor spreading during the Flood greatly warmed the world’s oceans.9 The oceans stayed warm for hundreds of years, causing intense evaporation from the ocean surface. This increased atmospheric moisture caused heavy snowfall at high latitudes and on mountaintops, but it also caused increased rainfall in other locations, as creation researcher and retired NWS meteorologist Michael Oard explains:

Such a unique Ice Age climate would cause much more precipitation all over the earth, simply because of the greater evaporation from a warm ocean. Furthermore, this precipitation would be distributed differently than it is today. This [Ice Age] climate has the potential to cause copious precipitation in currently arid and semi-arid areas, such as the southwest United States.10

The same would likely have been true of the Middle East,11 which may help explain why both the land of Egypt and the area around the Dead Sea are described as “well watered”12 at the time of Abraham, who was born about three hundred years after the Flood.13 Likewise, the Sahara desert used to receive abundant rainfall.14 Even by evolutionary reckoning, one such recent wet period lasted several thousand years.15

In uniformitarian thinking, abundant rainfall during the Ice Age is surprising. Both cold “ice ages” and the warmer “interglacials” in between are expected to be dry. The ice ages themselves are expected to be very cold, which would cause a dryer ice-age climate, since the maximum amount of moisture that can be contained in cold air is much less than that which can be contained by warmer air. Likewise, today’s climate is thought to be one of many interglacials between ice ages. Since the American southwest, in the supposed present-day “interglacial” is very arid, uniformitarians would expect it to have also been arid in past interglacials, since they believe “the present is the key to the past.”

Some evolutionary scientists claim the Sahara alternated between wet and dry periods every 20,000 years, and they attribute this to monsoon activity ultimately driven by subtle changes in the shape of the Earth’s orbit around the sun.16 However, this is not at all a convincing explanation. Changes in sunlight due to Earth’s orbital motions are so tiny that it is hard to see how they could cause such drastic climate change,17 especially drastic climate change that repeats every 20,000 years! Worse yet, this explanation assumes the validity of the astronomical or Milankovitch ice age theory, and original ICR research has revealed that the evidence for this theory, even by evolutionary reckoning, is extremely weak at best and non-existent at worst.18

Despite evolutionary hand-waving, wet Ice Age deserts are extremely difficult for evolutionary scientists to convincingly explain. However, the Bible’s real history makes much better sense of both these wet deserts and preserved Ice Age footprints.

References
1. Glaser, L. B. Ice Age human footprints discovered in Utah desert. Phys.org. Posted on phys.org July 26, 2022, accessed July 29, 2022.
2. Fossil footprints tell story of prehistoric parent’s journey. Phys.org. Posted on phys.org October 15, 2020, accessed July 29, 2022. 
3. Salleh, A. Earliest human footprints in Australia. ABC Science. Posted on abc.net.au December 21, 2005, accessed July 29, 2022.
4. Strickland, A. Ice age throwback: 13,000-year-old footprints found off Canadian coast. CNN. Posted on cnn.com March 28, 2018, accessed July 29, 2022.
5. Chambers, D. It’s a tall story: Giraffe roamed Still Bay in the Ice Age. Sunday Times Daily. Posted on timeslive.co.za February 1, 2018, accessed July 29, 2022.
6. Prior, R. Scientists in Chile have found a 15,000-year-old footprint, the earliest sign of humans’ presence in the Americas. CNN Travel. Posted on cnn.com April 29, 2019, accessed July 29, 2022.
7. Wei-Haas, M. Oldest footprints in Saudi Arabia reveal intriguing step in early human migration. National Geographic. Posted September 17, 2020 at nationalgeographic.com, accessed July 29, 2022. These Saudi Arabian footprints are 115,000 years old by mainstream reckoning, which means they would have been formed near the start of the “most recent” ice age.
8. Hebert, J. 2018. The Bible Best Explains the Ice Age. Acts & Facts. 47 (11).
9. Clarey, T. 2019. Subduction Was Essential for the Ice Age. Acts & Facts. 48 (3).
10. Oard, M. 2006. Frozen in Time: Woolly Mammoths, the Ice Age, and the Biblical Key to Their Secrets. Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 85.
11. Vardiman, L. 2011. A Well-Watered Land: Effects of the Genesis Flood on Precipitation in the Middle East. Acts & Facts. 40 (6): 12-15.
12. Genesis 13:10.
13. Ice, T. D. and J. J. S. Johnson. 2002. Using Scriptural Data to Calculate a Range-Qualified Chronology from Adam to Abraham. Presented at the Southwest Regional Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society at The Criswell College, Dallas, TX.
14. Clarey, T. 2020. Ancient Sahara Was Wetter Than Expected. Acts & Facts. 49 (4).
15. deMenocal, P. B. and J. E. Tierney. 2012. Green Sahara: African Humid Periods Paced by Earth’s Orbital Changes. Nature. Posted on nature.com, accessed August 4, 2022.
16. Chu, J. Study shows the Sahara swung between lush and desert conditions every 20,000 years, in sync with monsoon activity. Phys.org. Posted on phys.org January 2, 2019, accessed August 4, 2022.
17. Oard, M. J. 2007. Astronomical troubles for the astronomical hypothesis of ice ages. Journal of Creation. 21 (3): 19-23.
18. Hebert, J. 2020. Physics Today Article Ignores Monster Milankovitch Problem. Creation Science Update. Posted on ICR.org May 24, 2020, accessed August 4, 2022.


*Dr. Hebert is Research Scientist at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Texas at Dallas.
The Latest
NEWS
Do Fish Skulls Show Evolution?
Fish never learned to walk. Regardless, an evolutionary paleontologist suggested an undocumented scenario of how fish gradually evolved into four-legged...

ACTS & FACTS
Honoring Pioneers of Creation
It’s always fun to catch up with old friends. We recently asked some pioneers of the creation movement to share with us where they are in their...

ACTS & FACTS
Henry M. Morris and Duane T. Gish: Advancing the Cause of Christ
    The following excerpts by Dr. Henry Morris and Dr. Duane Gish were taken from the first issue of the Creation-Science...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer Don DeYoung
I first met Dr. Henry Morris in 1973 when he spoke in chapel at Grace College in Winona Lake, Indiana. With a growing interest in creation studies,...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer Larry Vardiman
Larry and Jeannette Vardiman   During my second year in graduate school at Colorado State University, I received a phone call...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer David Coppedge
David Coppedge   I’ve lived in Santa Clarita, California, since 1992, but I grew up in the San Fernando Valley. My parents...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer Russell Humphreys
Russell Humphreys   After I retired in 2008 from being an associate professor for the Institute for Creation Research, I moved...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer Gary Parker
Gary Parker   In rural south Florida where I grew up (Arcadia, DeSoto County), where my wife, Mary, and I had the first of our...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer John Baumgardner
My wife, Mary, and I currently live in central Virginia near Lynchburg and Liberty University, where I serve as research professor emeritus in the School...

ACTS & FACTS
John C. Whitcomb: God’s Providence and The Genesis Flood
John C. Whitcomb   John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris published The Genesis Flood in 1961. For the first time, a book presented...