Mayflower Pilgrims, Simian DNA, and Straw Men | The Institute for Creation Research
Mayflower Pilgrims, Simian DNA, and Straw Men

Both the Mayflower Pilgrims and biblical creationists are unjustly targeted for straw man vilifications using misleading, false accusations. A straw man fallacy occurs when a critic disagrees with someone based on an alleged fault or flaw—yet the opponent is not guilty of that alleged fault or flaw.1 Consider the difference: fighting and defeating a healthy human opponent versus beating up a lifeless scarecrow-like effigy of one’s opponent (a straw man). Anyone can defeat a lifeless scarecrow.

However, defeating a living foe requires a true contest. Yet, critics often claim “fake fight” victories when they dishonestly defeat historical heroes they dislike. Fake-fight victories are also claimed—on false pretenses—over Scripture by evolutionists who crow about disproving a scientific “claim” that biblical creationists never made in the first place.

We’ll first look at how straw man mischaracterizations are dishonestly cast via sloppy history. Then we’ll see how similar misreporting is used to mischaracterize real facts via sloppy science.

Sloppy History

Some accuse the Mayflower Pilgrims, who arrived at Plymouth exactly 400 years ago, of stealing the land of Native Americans. But this misrepresentation of the Pilgrims’ history is inexcusably misreported. Actually, the Pilgrims settled on land that was intentionally abandoned by the nearby native tribes because that land was deemed cursed and haunted. Previous tribes who had lived there died of an unusual plague about three years before the Pilgrims arrived.2

Plymouth Plantation was thus settled on land rejected by local tribes. To accuse the Pilgrims of “stealing” Native American land is an irresponsible failure to inspect actual historical truth. Accordingly, whoever denigrates the Pilgrims’ settlement as somehow unethical is really condemning the faults of a straw man who never lived at Plymouth.

Sloppy Science

Some evolutionists assert that there is almost no difference between human DNA and simian (monkey/ape-like) DNA, insinuating that the Genesis creation account cannot be scientifically trusted. Suppose an evolutionist argues that genetics evidence clashes with the Genesis record, saying, “When compared to the chimpanzee, the two species [human and chimp] differ by as little as 1 to 2%”—that would be a straw man fallacy. Why? Because the actual difference between the human and chimpanzee genomes is at least 15%, so trying to “match” a 1 to 2% genomic difference with the biblical account will never line up.3

Instead, Genesis-affirming scientists expect less—though still some—genomic overlap between chimpanzees and humans because God designed humans and simians to inhabit the same world, breathe the same air, eat many of the same foods, drink the same water, etc. But to imply that Genesis must “force fit” a genomic difference range of only 1 to 2% is to flippantly advocate a straw man argument when the real genomic difference is beyond 15%.3

Don’t be fooled by the straw man logical fallacy of those who disparage the Pilgrims as you thank God for blessing America through their bravery 400 years ago. Likewise, don’t be fooled by evolutionists who imply that human genotypes almost identically resemble chimpanzee genotypes—because Darwinists who promote such sloppy science are just unjustly monkeying with the facts.4

References

  1. McDurmon, J. 2011. Biblical Logic in Theory and Practice: Refuting the Fallacies of Humanism, Darwinism, Atheism, and Just Plain Stupidity. Powder Springs, GA: The American Vision, Inc., 203-213.
  2. Bradford, W. 1989. Of Plymouth Plantation, 1620–1647. New York: Alfred A Knopf, 87.
  3. Tomkins, J. P. 2018. Separate Studies Converge on Human-Chimp DNA Dissimilarity. Acts & Facts. 47 (11): 9. See also Tomkins, J. P. 2016. Analysis of 101 Chimpanzee Trace Read Data Sets: Assessment of Their Overall Similarity to Human and Possible Contamination with Human DNA. Answers Research Journal. 9: 294-298.
  4. 1 Timothy 6:20-21.

* Dr. Johnson is Associate Professor of Apologetics and Chief Academic Officer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: James J. S. Johnson, J.D., Th.D. 2020. Mayflower Pilgrims, Simian DNA, and Straw Men. Acts & Facts. 49 (11).

The Latest
NEWS
Is Evolution ‘Fake Science’?
The organization BioLogos, which advocates that Christians accept secular evolutionary claims, recently published an online essay entitled “How to...

NEWS
Cambrian Explosion Alive and Well
A new editorial in GSA Today is claiming that secular scientists should cease using the term “Cambrian Explosion.”1 It’s not...

NEWS
Abraham Ate Bananas?
Since the word banana does not occur in Scripture, any evidence of bananas in ancient Middle Eastern diets would have to come from the ground. New research...

NEWS
3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending...

NEWS
Amazonian Artwork and the Post-Flood Ice Age
An extensive series of South American Ice Age artwork may be of interest to biblical creationists. In 2017 and 2018, scientists discovered a nearly eight-mile-long...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Dinosaurs
You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with ICR’s special Creation Kids learning...

NEWS
Inside January 2021 Acts & Facts
How is ICR winning science and scientists back to Christ? What is the significance of fossil bone collagen discoveries? Did pterosaurs have feathers?...

ACTS & FACTS
Savvy Sons of Light
Many Christians grow uncomfortable when their pastor teaches about money. If it’s any consolation, I know many pastors who feel the same way....

ACTS & FACTS
Did God Make Harmful Parasites in the Beginning?
Parasites are a unique form of life in today’s world. These invertebrates come in all shapes and sizes, from single-cell animals (e.g., Plasmodium...

APOLOGETICS
False Hypotheticals—Beyond Darwin's Imagination
Don’t believe it if someone tells you that a pair of “walking whale”-like mammals trudged off the Ark and later procreated a line...