Did Someone Really Find Noah's Ark? | The Institute for Creation Research

Did Someone Really Find Noah's Ark?

I recall a tough conversation with a skeptical student after speaking on creation and the Flood at a Christian school. This young man insisted he would never believe the Genesis Flood unless someone could show him Noah’s Ark. I tried to explain that such a standard of evidence is unreasonable considering the low likelihood of wood lasting for millennia. He refused to listen.

Would such an apparently stony soul take God at His Word if researchers found the real Ark? At least two factors keep serious Ark researchers primed for the hunt despite grave challenges.

First, the prize would be high. Noah’s Ark remnants would become the world’s oldest archaeological artifacts according to the Bible’s timeline. They would confirm biblical history more convincingly than even the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Second, 20th-century eyewitnesses independently described broken Ark-like remains in similar settings on Mt. Ararat in Turkey. A half-dozen reports describe Noah’s Ark remnants sitting on a ledge in a meltwater pond. Ed Davis’ account from 1943 has perhaps the most details. These accounts were the main reason ICR’s Dr. John Morris led a dozen expeditions to Mt. Ararat during the 1970s and 1980s. Those efforts returned tales of terrifying times but no Ark.1 Some speculate that high temperatures in the mid-20th century exposed Ark remnants that the ice has since covered.

Decades ago, explorer Ron Wyatt claimed that a boat-shaped feature was Noah’s Ark. ICR scientists reviewed the evidence and concluded it was instead a geological formation.2 A group of Chinese Ark researchers called NAMI claimed to have found Noah’s Ark in 2010. Those claims proved false after locals admitted to being hired to haul wood up the mountain to make a fake Ark for money.3

The 2015 film Finding Noah chronicled expeditions to the summit of Mt. Ararat leading up to 2014. It showed researchers using radar and drill cores to penetrate the ice cap. Although they found no Ark either, the film somehow buoys hope.

Then in 2016, a faction of Turks failed a coup attempt on President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and his Turkish government. The aftermath led to a tighter Muslim grip and persecution of Turks and Christians. Ark researchers long to return but must wait until safer times. Even then, should explorers bother to go back?

ICR’s Dr. Tim Clarey suggests that Mt. Ararat arose after the Ark had landed.4 This geological consideration might disqualify Mt. Ararat as a likely Ark landing site, but it does not deal with the eyewitness evidence. Even if the Ark did land there, Mt. Ararat has been very active over its existence. Could remnants of a roughly 500-foot-long wooden box survive volcanoes, earthquakes, scavengers, and grinding glaciers?

These challenges dim, but do not douse, hope for an Ark discovery. Some locals point to the eyewitness testimony to justify their belief in the Ark on Ararat despite challenging arguments against it.

We don’t yet have Noah’s Ark, and it looks unlikely to turn up. But the good news is we don’t need the Ark to believe Genesis. We already have a world full of rock layers and fossils from the Flood.5 God has given us every reason to trust Him and His Word—even the parts about Noah’s Ark.

References

  1. Morris, J. 2018. Searching for Noah’s Ark. Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers.
  2. Morris, J. 1992. The Search for Noah’s Ark: Status 1992. Acts & Facts. 21 (9).
  3. Thomas, B. Noah’s Ark ‘Discovery’ Likely a Sinking Ship. Creation Science Update. Posted on ICR.org October 26, 2015.
  4. Clarey, T. 2019. The Ark Landed West of Mt. Ararat. Acts & Facts. 48 (7): 9.
  5. Clarey, T. 2020. Carved in Stone. Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research.

* Dr. Thomas is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in paleobiochemistry from the University of Liverpool.

Cite this article: Brian Thomas, Ph.D. 2020. Did Someone Really Find Noah's Ark?. Acts & Facts. 49 (9).

The Latest
ACTS & FACTS
Pervasive Genome Functionality Destroys the Myth of Junk DNA
In 2001, the first rough draft of the human genome was published in a collaborative effort between private industry and the public sector.1,2...

NEWS
Happy Labor Day 2025
“For we are laborers together with God: ye are God’s husbandry, ye are God’s building.” (1 Corinthians 3:9) Labor Day was...

ACTS & FACTS
The Age of Reptiles Myth
We hear about the Age of Reptiles, also called the Age of Dinosaurs, almost as early as we can understand the idea. Even kindergarteners might be taught...

ACTS & FACTS
The Tiktaalik Missing Link Myth
In 2004, the paleontological community—and the world—was presented with what many evolutionists considered to be a dyedin- the-wool missing...

ACTS & FACTS
Archaeopteryx, Myth of a Transitional Fossil
In 1860, one year after the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, a wonderfully preserved fossil feather was discovered in...

ACTS & FACTS
Busting the Myth about Lucy
by Brian Thomas, Ph.D., and Chris Rupe, Ph.D.* Most folks consider our ape ancestry as established science, with Lucy as the main link. However,...

ACTS & FACTS
Evolutionary Vestigial Features: Worse Than Myth, a Scam
Due to teachers’ influence during the formative years of young people’s lives, they can be a powerful force in spreading evolution to new...

ACTS & FACTS
Blind Cavefish Unmask the Convergent Evolution Myth
Within the ever-expanding theory of evolution, there is a system of specialized language designed to identify each major interpretative concept. Some...

ACTS & FACTS
A Booming Generation
And the king answered them roughly; and king Rehoboam forsook the counsel of the old men, and answered them after the advice of the young men.…And...

ACTS & FACTS
Darwin's Galápagos Finches: The Myth of Natural Selection
A group of birds known as Darwin’s finches (genus Geospiza) lives in the Galápagos Islands in the Pacific Ocean 600 miles west of Ecuador....