The Genesis Flood : Upheaval in Uniformitarian Geology | The Institute for Creation Research

The Genesis Flood : Upheaval in Uniformitarian Geology


The publication of The Genesis Flood by Drs. John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris in 1961 revolutionized and invigorated modern creation science. Their book exposed the dilemma Bible-believing Christians face—whether to accept conventional geologists’ verdict of a billions-of-years-old Earth or the biblical account of a global flood just thousands of years ago.1 As Whitcomb and Morris noted:

The decision then must be faced: either the Biblical record of the Flood is false and must be rejected or else the system of historical geology which has seemed to discredit it is wrong and must be changed.2

To resolve this dichotomy, they argued that Christians must “restudy and re-think the great mass of geologic and paleontologic data” with the goal of outlining a new, biblically based geological model for the global Flood.3


Whitcomb and Morris undertook a massive literature review with the goal of identifying inadequacies in conventional geological explanations. Their second goal was to construct a new framework for historical geology that “would serve as a better basis of correlation for the available scientific data than does the present one.”3 To do this, they drew upon the work of earlier creationists such as George McCready Price and Walter E. Lammerts. But first and foremost, their interpretations were founded on the historical reality of the global Flood.


The immediate result was the revitalization of biblically based science. Whitcomb and Morris created a new narrative by reinterpreting the available geological data, suggesting that the vast majority of fossiliferous sedimentary rocks was the product of the year-long Flood. In effect, they built a model that better explained the geology we observe.

Whitcomb and Morris began by assuming that most Precambrian rocks were formed by the events on Day 3 of the creation week (Genesis 1:9-13). They suggested that the bursting of the “fountains” on the first day of the Flood (Genesis 7:11) was accompanied by massive releases of both magma and water. Furthermore, they envisioned that early Flood crustal displacements would have produced devastating tsunamis that raced across the oceans. These waves would have picked up and carried sediment and marine organisms, depositing them as the rocks and fossils of the earliest Flood (Paleozoic).

Later, plants and land animals would have been sequentially buried as the Flood continued to rise. Their particular burial order was based on three factors: (1) mobility of the animal, (2) density and hydrodynamic factors, and (3) elevation of habitat. As the authors explained, “The order is exactly what is to be expected in light of the Flood account.”4

Whitcomb and Morris also placed the Flood/post-Flood boundary near the top of the Tejas Megasequence (Tertiary), just below the Ice Age deposits. And this is where ICR scientists still place the upper Flood boundary.5,6


Although The Genesis Flood was written before the modern theory of plate tectonics and catastrophic plate tectonics,7,8 its geological insights were truly remarkable. This one book sparked the modern creation movement and revived faith in the trustworthiness of the Bible.

Dr. Henry Morris went on to establish the Institute for Creation Research in 1970 and wrote a total of 66 books. Much of what he wrote is still valid and widely accepted by the creation science community. Most of his predictions and insights have stood the test of time, with only a few that needed adjustment as more data were unveiled.

In testament to its lasting value, The Genesis Flood is still required reading for anyone interested in a scientific and biblically based alternative to evolutionary dogma.


  1. Whitcomb, J. C. and H. M. Morris. 1961. The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications. Philadelphia, PA: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.
  2. Ibid, 118.
  3. Ibid, 119.
  4. Ibid, 276.
  5. Clarey, T. 2020. Compelling evidence for an Upper Cenozoic Flood Boundary. Acts & Facts. 49 (5): 9.
  6. Clarey, T. L. and D. J. Werner. 2019. Compelling evidence for an Upper Cenozoic Flood/post- Flood boundary: Paleogene and Neogene marine strata that completely surround Turkey. Creation Research Society Quarterly. 56 (2): 68-75.
  7. Austin, S. A. et al. 1994. Catastrophic Plate Tectonics: A Global Flood Model of Earth History. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism. R. E. Walsh, ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship, 609-621.
  8. Baumgardner, J. 1994. Runaway Subduction as the Driving Mechanism for the Genesis Flood. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Creationism. R. E. Walsh, ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship, 63-75.

* Dr. Clarey is Director of Research at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in geology from Western Michigan University.

Cite this article: Tim Clarey, Ph.D. 2023. The Genesis Flood : Upheaval in Uniformitarian Geology. Acts & Facts. 52 (10).

The Latest
Is There Evidence for a Creator?
Contrary to what some scientists claim, there is compelling philosophical and scientific evidence that a Creator of the universe exists. For example,...

Forged in Faith: The Hard Work of Making Disciples | Creation.Live...
Jesus commanded that we make disciples, but what does that mean in this modern world? Has the church gone soft?   Hosts Trey and...

Algal Microfossils Show No Evolution
Creation scientists maintain that if something is living, then it’s automatically complex. This applies to organisms ranging from a single bacterium...

Rapid Erosion Devastates Deep Time! | The Creation Podcast: Episode...
Erosion takes place slowly, over millions of years, right? That's what mainstream science tells us anyway. Or, does erosion happen far more...

Flood Solves Land and Marine Mixing Near the Andes
A recent article published by Hakai Magazine claims to reveal secrets of an ancient inland sea that existed east of the Andes Mountains,1...

T. rex Out of Nowhere
As one of the largest predators ever at 45 feet long, it’s no wonder school children are enthralled with Tyrannosaurus rex. But where did the...

February 2024 ICR Wallpaper
"Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another." (1 John 4:11 NKJV) ICR February 2024 wallpaper is now available...

Evolutionist and ICR Research Both Attempting to Explain Fossil...
Recent evolutionary research is attempting to provide an explanation for why some animals became smaller over time. Or equivalently, it is attempting...

Animal Features Did Not Evolve
There’s no doubt that animals in God’s creation have iconic features. The question is, did these features evolve or were they created that...

Taking a Closer Look at Uniquely Human Eyes | The Creation Podcast:...
While we might take them for granted, our eyes are incredibly complex organs. How do they work? Is it possible for eyes to have evolved over long...