Deep Water Coals Discovery Supports Flood | The Institute for Creation Research
Deep Water Coals Discovery Supports Flood

Recent geological discoveries are defying standard uniformitarian explanations. First there was the massive Whopper Sand found in the deep water of the Gulf of Mexico.1 Then there was the dinosaur bone washed 70 miles offshore and buried 1.5 miles deep.2 And now researchers have come across another startling discovery—coal beds hidden far beneath the South China Sea.3

Geologist Peter Lunt reviewed recent oil well drilling data in an area in the South China Sea known as North Luconia, about 175 miles off the coast of Borneo.3 The oil wells were drilled in over 3,000 feet of water and yet penetrated a thick section of bedded coals at the bottom. Coal deposits form when land plants are buried between sedimentary layers, but no land is near these particular deposits. So, how did these coals form in such deep water so far offshore?

Lunt claims these coals were not transported to the deep water but were buried where the plants grew. He believes the coal was only found in such deep water because the land sank nearly two miles.

He tried to explain:

Coal-bearing Late Oligocene beds are known in several wells in North Luconia, but now in water depths of more than 1000 m [about 3,300 feet], with these coals typically 3 km [1.9 miles] or more below modern sea level. These wells therefore indicate 3 km or more of basement [crustal] subsidence since the Late Oligocene.3

Lunt also found that the coal-bearing sediments are as much as 5,000 feet thick, adding the second mile to the mystery. He added:

Geohistory analysis of the G10-1 well shows that the Oligocene section [containing coal beds] drilled there is both thick and rapidly deposited. The facies [perceived environment] is remarkably consistent over the 2100 m [1.3 miles] of section, with facies…suggesting coastal to very shallow marine throughout.3

Lunt explained that the lack of variation within the coal-rich Oligocene section and across an area greater than 10,000 square km (3,861 square miles) was simply because these thick coal beds sank at exactly the same rate as the coal was accumulating to keep the surface near sea level.3 To maintain such a balance for a mile-thick section would be a very tricky prospect indeed.

Lunt also found that a thick deep-water Miocene section was deposited directly on top of the coal beds. This implies that the land surface had to instantly drop about a mile from one deposit to the next. Lunt discovered that the Mulu-1 well “is quite exceptional in the extremity of events it shows,” adding more coincidences to the story.3

In total, he proposes over two miles of subsidence to place the coals so deep below the ocean surface—one mile for the Oligocene coal beds and then a second mile to accommodate the deep-water Miocene rocks deposited on top. This second act of subsidence had to be nearly instantaneous to change from a “coastal” to a “deep-water” environment across the Oligocene-Miocene boundary. This is highly improbable in itself.

Speculations about rapid “yo-yo” movements of the crust are common in uniformitarian explanations because it’s the only way to maintain their worldview. In reality, these Oligocene coal beds are better explained by the tremendous water runoff that occurred toward the end of the global Flood.4 This interpretation doesn’t require any extreme up-and-down movement. The energy of the receding phase of the Flood could easily transport land plants 175 miles or more out to the deep sea, just like it did the Whopper Sand, and then rapidly bury them in marine sediments. We can add coal beds in deep water of the South China Sea to the ever-growing list of evidence for the global Flood.

References

  1. Clarey, T. A Whopper Mystery for Nearly 20 Years. Creation Science Update. Posted on ICR.org April 22, 2020, accessed June 5, 2020.
  2. Clarey, T. and J. J. S. Johnson. 2019. Deep-Sea Dinosaur Fossil Buries EvolutionActs & Facts. 48 (8): 10-13.
  3. Lunt, P. 2019. A new view of integrating stratigraphic and tectonic analysis in South China Sea and north Borneo basins. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 177: 220-239.
  4. Clarey, T. 2020. Carved in Stone. Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research.

* Dr. Clarey is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in geology from Western Michigan University.

Cite this article: Tim Clarey, Ph.D. 2020. Deep Water Coals Discovery Supports Flood. Acts & Facts. 49 (8).

The Latest
NEWS
Remembering Patti Morse
But none of these things move me; nor do I count my life dear to myself, so that I may finish my race with joy, and the ministry which I received from...

CREATION PODCAST
What Happened with Washington's Violent Volcano? | The Creation...
How did a 1980 volcanic eruption change our understanding of geology? What impact did this event have on the age assignments of sediments? Join us for...

NEWS
Fossil Insect Predation Shows No Evidence of Evolution
Some recent science news stories have come out describing fossils of insects feeding on plants supposedly many “millions of years ago.” What...

NEWS
Adaptive Genetic and Epigenetic Changes in Plants
Being sedentary organisms, plants are essentially stuck where they are planted and need to dynamically adapt to the conditions around them to not only...

NEWS
Dr. Tim Clarey Awarded Adjunct Professor of the Year
Congratulations to ICR Research Scientist and geologist Dr. Tim Clarey! He received the Adjunct Professor of the Year award from King’s University,...

NEWS
Mars Rover Records Dramatic Solar Eclipse
NASA’s Mars Perseverance rover has filmed the Martian satellite (or moon) Phobos eclipsing the sun, and this short but impressive video may be viewed...

CREATION PODCAST
Darwin or Design? CET Pt. 2 | The Creation Podcast: Episode 22
How does design provide a better explanation for biological functions and adaptations than natural selection? And how can engineering principles help...

NEWS
Resurrecting “Ancient” Enzymes?
The most abundant protein on Earth is probably an enzyme (biological catalyst) called RuBisCO (or Rubisco) designed by the Creator to function in photosynthesis.1...

NEWS
Inside May-June 2022 Acts & Facts
How can Christians stand up to scientific elitism? What does the plant fossil record in Iceland tell us about the global Flood? Does a new bacterium...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Grand Canyon
by Christy Hardy and Susan Windsor* You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation...