Search Tools | The Institute for Creation Research
Skip to main content

The Institute for Creation Research

Donate
Subscribe
Menu
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Core Principles
    • Research Staff
    • We Are ICR
    • Education
    • Careers
    • Contact
  • News
    • This Week's Articles
    • Past Articles
    • Free Mobile App
  • Publications
    • Acts & Facts
      • This Month's Issue
      • Past Issues
      • Free Subscription
    • Days of Praise
      • Today's Devotional
      • Past Devotionals
      • Free Subscription
      • Back Issues
    • Bible
    • Creation Kids
    • Technical Papers
      • Past Articles
      • Latest Articles
    • Catalog
    • Subscriptions
    • Submissions
  • Media
    • Podcasts
      • Days of Praise
      • The Creation Podcast
      • Creation.Live
      • Science, Scripture, & Salvation
    • Social Media
    • That's a Fact
    • DVD Series
      • Unlocking the Mysteries of Genesis
      • Made in His Image
      • Uncovering the Truth About Dinosaurs
      • The Universe
    • Submissions
  • Events
    • Upcoming ICR Events
    • Our Speakers
    • How to Host an Event
    • Kids on Mission
  • Give
    • Donate
    • Planned Giving
    • Public Financial Disclosures
  • Store
    • Catalog

Search Tools


 
Bible - modify search
  • « Book
  • ‹ Chapter
  • All Verses
  • Chapter ›
  • Book »
Revelation 17:15
And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.

Powered by phpBible.org
 
More Reliable Evidence Is Required
TFN Survey's Flawed Methodology Invalidates It
In an effort to influence the Texas State Board of Education to ban the teaching of the weaknesses apparent in evolutionary theory, the Texas Freedom Network...
BY: RANDY J. GULIUZZA, P.E., M.D.
Creation and First Amendment Rights
Early in 1992, ICR won a stunning victory in Federal Court. The state of California had attempted to close the ICR Graduate School, branding those who...
BY: JOHN D. MORRIS, PH.D.

Recently I was called for jury duty. The one trial for which I was selected seems trivial enough (except for those involved), but it contained certain intricacies.

It involved a cab driver who picked up two late-night, stranded motorists. All three had been drinking. Before it was over, there had been a nasty fight and the motorists claimed the cabby stole their money. All involved—the fares, the cabby, the police, the dispatcher, etc., had a different story, and all were convincing. As the jury, we had the difficult job of sorting it all out, of reconstructing the past, unobserved by any of us, as best we could from partial and conflicting evidence. We didn't have direct access to the past, only the evidence which existed in the present and the stories of those who had witnessed portions of the past events. Not an easy task!

When attempting to answer the origins' question, scientists are in a similar situation. Science rightly deals with the present state of nature and the processes, which presently operate, in nature. Creationists and evolutionists agree precisely when dealing with these issues, (i.e., with science). All agree on the nature of the genetic code or the array of fossils, or the laws of physics, biology, and chemistry. How then can there be such disagreement about the past?

This present/past issue is the crux of the creation/evolution controversy. No scientist had direct access to the past—all are locked in the present, studying the evidence, which exists in the present, observing the processes, which operate in the present. Science is limited to the present. It is not illegitimate for a—scientist to attempt to reconstruct the past—to try to answer the question, "What happened in the past to make the present get to be this way?" But, clearly, that is not the same thing as empirical science. Both evolution and creation are historical reconstructions, not observations.

As creationists, we insist that we cannot scientifically prove creation or disprove evolution. Both are ways of thinking—schemes by which we can interpret present data. All we can do is study the evidence in the present and see which historical reconstruction is more likely correct.

Present data include the incredible design of living systems which, look for the entire world as if they were "manufactured" by an intelligent designer, and not the random by-product of chance processes. We have the universal Second Law of Thermodynamics, which shows that things become more disordered through time, not more complex, as evolution insists. We see no clue in the fossil record that any basic category of animal ever came from any other basic category. And on and on.

These scientific observations fit well with the creation model, but not at all well with the evolution model. We cannot scientifically prove or disprove either creation or evolution, mainly because we don't have direct access to the past, but we can assert that creation is better—the one most likely correct.

But creationists have another advantage. Even though we can't "study the past," we can study the record of One who was an active eyewitness throughout the past, who can accurately communicate His thoughts and deeds, and whose Word is true.

*Dr. John Morris is the President of ICR.

[body_edit] =>

Recently I was called for jury duty. The one trial for which I was selected seems trivial enough (except for those involved), but it contained certain intricacies.

It involved a cab driver who picked up two late-night, stranded motorists. All three had been drinking. Before it was over, there had been a nasty fight and the motorists claimed the cabby stole their money. All involved—the fares, the cabby, the police, the dispatcher, etc., had a different story, and all were convincing. As the jury, we had the difficult job of sorting it all out, of reconstructing the past, unobserved by any of us, as best we could from partial and conflicting evidence. We didn't have direct access to the past, only the evidence which existed in the present and the stories of those who had witnessed portions of the past events. Not an easy task!

When attempting to answer the origins' question, scientists are in a similar situation. Science rightly deals with the present state of nature and the processes, which presently operate, in nature. Creationists and evolutionists agree precisely when dealing with these issues, (i.e., with science). All agree on the nature of the genetic code or the array of fossils, or the laws of physics, biology, and chemistry. How then can there be such disagreement about the past?

This present/past issue is the crux of the creation/evolution controversy. No scientist had direct access to the past—all are locked in the present, studying the evidence, which exists in the present, observing the processes, which operate in the present. Science is limited to the present. It is not illegitimate for a—scientist to attempt to reconstruct the past—to try to answer the question, "What happened in the past to make the present get to be this way?" But, clearly, that is not the same thing as empirical science. Both evolution and creation are historical reconstructions, not observations.

As creationists, we insist that we cannot scientifically prove creation or disprove evolution. Both are ways of thinking—schemes by which we can interpret present data. All we can do is study the evidence in the present and see which historical reconstruction is more likely correct.

Present data include the incredible design of living systems which, look for the entire world as if they were "manufactured" by an intelligent designer, and not the random by-product of chance processes. We have the universal Second Law of Thermodynamics, which shows that things become more disordered through time, not more complex, as evolution insists. We see no clue in the fossil record that any basic category of animal ever came from any other basic category. And on and on.

These scientific observations fit well with the creation model, but not at all well with the evolution model. We cannot scientifically prove or disprove either creation or evolution, mainly because we don't have direct access to the past, but we can assert that creation is better—the one most likely correct.

But creationists have another advantage. Even though we can't "study the past," we can study the record of One who was an active eyewitness throughout the past, who can accurately communicate His thoughts and deeds, and whose Word is true.

*Dr. John Morris is the President of ICR.

[typeID] => 3 [visible] => t [pdf] => [publishURL] => can-scientists-study-past [publishDate] => 0000-00-00 [authorAsterisk] => f [domainID] => 1 [publication] => [volume] => [issue] => [page] => [author] => John D. Morris, Ph.D. [rand] => 220702451.5409496 ) -->
Can Scientists Study the Past?
Recently I was called for jury duty. The one trial for which I was selected seems trivial enough (except for those involved), but it contained certain...
BY: JOHN D. MORRIS, PH.D.
More Government and Politics
Will Norway Invade Privacy by Reversing Continuous Tracking?
ICR’s Dr. Randy Guliuzza has repeatedly illustrated and explained how continuous environmental tracking works in animals and mankind.1...
BY: JAMES J. S. JOHNSON, J.D., TH.D.
Cuckoo Completes Mammoth 7,500-Mile Migration
One particular common cuckoo will soon complete a mammoth migration through both Africa and Asia—a migration that is anything but common. Onon...
BY: JAMES J. S. JOHNSON, J.D., TH.D.
The Danger of Tunnel Vision
In an executive order, dated May 1, 2020, our president made this declaration: I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find...
BY: REBECCA MORRIS BARBER
More Back to Genesis
Dinosaurs: Delightful Dragons
A Florida woman recently received national attention when she suggested (somewhat in jest) that a long-tailed creature captured in early morning home...
BY: JAKE HEBERT, PH.D.
Man: Smart from the Start
People have been created with a three-pound brain that scientists will never fully understand. Evolutionists have tried to trace the evolution of the...
BY: FRANK SHERWIN, D.SC. (HON.)
Building a Human Body: Jesus Christ's Amazing Engineering
When Charles Darwin formulated his theory of evolution, he appealed to the logic of ancestry, the evident diversity of species, and the magic of time....
BY: GREGORY J. BREWER, PH.D.
Shop Related Products
The Genesis Flood, 50th Anniversary Edition
$12.99
$16.99
$
The Henry Morris Study Bible - Leather
$79.99
$94.99
The Henry Morris Study Bible - Case
$34.99
$39.99
The God Who is Real
$9.99
Institute for Creation ResearchICR Discovery Center for Science and Earth History
About  UsNewsPublicationsMediaEventsGiveStoreEducation

As a federally recognized 501(c)(3) nonprofit ministry of the USA, all gifts to ICR are completely tax deductible to the fullest extent allowed by U.S. law.

Use Policy•Privacy Policy•Subscriptions•Contact


Twitter X logo


Content ©2025 Institute for Creation Research

  • Donate to ICR
  • Subscribe

ICR Menu

  • Search
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Core Principles
    • Research Staff
    • We Are ICR
    • Education
    • Careers
    • Contact
  • News
    • This Week's Articles
    • Past Articles
    • Free Mobile App
  • Publications
    • Acts & Facts
    • Days of Praise
    • Bible
    • Creation Kids
    • Technical Papers
    • Catalog
    • Subscriptions
    • Submissions
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Social Media
    • That's a Fact
    • DVD Series
    • Submissions
  • Events
    • Upcoming ICR Events
    • Our Speakers
    • How to Host an Event
    • Kids on Mission
  • Give
    • Donate
    • Planned Giving
    • Public Financial Disclosures
  • Social
    Media