Huge Virus a Missing Link? | The Institute for Creation Research
Huge Virus a Missing Link?

In 1992, researchers discovered a giant virus with so much DNA that some have called it a “viral missing link.” Evolutionary scientists claimed that it has features that reflect both a living cell and non-living matter, and may thus provide a clue as to the origin of the first cell.1 But new high resolution images and a closer inspection of this massive virus actually point to design, rather than evolutionary development.

The Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus is so rare that it is the only viral species in its genus. Its capsid, or protein shell, is a 400nm-wide icosahedron—a mammoth among viruses. Three-dimensional images of its surface were prepared by cleverly removing the host of protein fibers attached to the capsid, and then patching together thousands of electron micrographs.2 Although there is plenty of space for more, the mimivirus holds quite a bit of DNA inside its capsid. Preliminary DNA sequence comparisons indicated that it has about 905 genes.3

A handful of these genes (lengths of DNA that code for specific proteins) are unique among viruses, and a few were thought to only occur in whole, living cells. Thus, some researchers have interpreted the considerable size of the capsid, the significant amount of DNA, the large number of genes, and the presence of genes thought to be exclusive to cellular life to mean that the presumed evolutionary ancestor to the first living cell may have resembled the mimivirus.

But the mimivirus has no machinery to unpack, transcribe, translate, or repair its genes. Like all other viruses, it borrows pre-existing, fully functioning cellular machinery for that purpose from a living host cell. A mimivirus also doesn’t detect or respond to its environment, reproduce, or perform any metabolic activities on its own. It just passively floats around until it “docks” with a host. The difference between a mimivirus and a host cell is like the difference between a computer disk with a virus on it and a fully-functioning computer (except that unlike computers, living cells manufacture their own parts, and repair and copy themselves).

Rather than serving as developmental stepping stones, viruses may originally have served a specific purpose. Evolutionary-turned-creation scientist Gary Parker proposed in 2006 that “in God’s originally perfect creation, the interlocking of docking and receptor proteins was designed to allow viruses to insert their DNA (or RNA) into only those cells in which gene transfer would be beneficial….Perhaps God, the ultimate Genetic Engineer, designed viruses as gene carriers, especially for bacteria, which are incredibly streamlined for genetic efficiency and rapid response to environmental stimuli.”4

Most viruses are host-specific, and many are even tissue-specific. The mimivirus specifically infects amoebas. Though they are single-celled creatures, amoebas have massive genomes. For example, Amoeba dubia has 200 times more DNA than humans.5 It would make sense that a viral particle that interacts exclusively with amoebas would also have a large DNA content, especially if it was originally designed to carry extra “repair or replace” copies of genes for the amoebas. Thus, the mimivirus does not look at all like a missing link but rather like the remnant of what was once a well-designed, very good aspect of God’s living world.

References

  1. Keim, B. Viral Missing Link Caught on Film. Wired Science. Posted on wired.com May 5, 2009, accessed May 6, 2009.
  2. Xiao, C. et al. 2009. Structural Studies of the Giant Mimivirus. Public Library of Science Biology. 7 (4): e92.
  3. Mimiviridae. Fact sheet from Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. Posted on expasy.org, accessed May 7, 2009.
  4. Parker, G. 2006. Creation: Facts of Life. Green River, AR: Master Books, 140.
  5. Gregory, T. R., and P. D. N. Hebert. 1999. The Modulation of DNA Content: Proximate Causes and Ultimate Consequences. Genome Research. 9 (4): 317-324. 

Image Credit: PLoS Biology

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on May 15, 2009.

The Latest
NEWS
No Evidence T. rex Hatchlings Had Feathers
The recent discovery of a tiny tyrannosaur jaw bone fragment and a claw has some scientists again pushing dinosaurs as birds.1 But is there...

NEWS
Inside March 2021 Acts & Facts
Why does ICR uphold the clarity of Scripture? How do we know that canyons were formed by the Genesis Flood? How do fossilized fish confirm biblical...

DAYS OF PRAISE DEVOTIONALS
Spring 2021
...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Human Hands
You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with ICR’s special Creation Kids learning...

ACTS & FACTS
Dross and Dilution
The first of seven great signs of Jesus’ deity recorded in John’s gospel is the wedding in Cana of Galilee (John 2:1-11). By the time Jesus...

APOLOGETICS
Do the Unpersuaded Have Enough Proof?
At a local Bible conference, a respected seminary professor unintentionally contradicted the apostle Paul. During the Q&A session, he opined that...

ACTS & FACTS
Gunnison's Black Canyon: The Flood Solves Mysterious Missing...
Brian Thomas, Ph.D., and Tim Clarey, Ph.D. The Gunnison River winds westward from the Colorado Rocky Mountains through dry and dramatic landscapes....

ACTS & FACTS
Do We See Complex Design in Mosquito Eggs?
Mosquitoes hatch from tiny eggs and spend a few days filter-feeding on things like bacteria, pollen, and algae. They molt three times as they grow,...

ACTS & FACTS
A Texas-Size Spider Mystery
The delightfully creepy spider belongs to a class called Arachnida—which is distinct from the “bug” class Insecta. Not surprisingly,...

ACTS & FACTS
The Fossils Still Say No: The Fins-to-Feet Transition
One of the alleged greatest transformations in vertebrate evolution is said to be the emergence of creatures that traded fins for feet and transitioned...