Fully-functional and distinct eye designs are found throughout the animal world. They are diverse, and yet each one contains such highly specified interconnected parts that evolutionary scientists have admitted that they had to have evolved separately.¹ Perhaps the most bizarre ocular structure is in the barreleye fish Macropinna microstoma.

“Creationists claim there are no transitional fossils, aka missing links. Biologists and paleontologists, among others, know this claim is false,” according to a recent LiveScience article that then describes what it claims are 12 specific transitional form fossils.¹ But do these examples really confirm Darwinism?

In the Western world, most people--even many Christians--are convinced that science has proven evolution and its millions-of-years timescale. In believing this, they generally do not separate the naturalistic interpretations of scientific data from the data itself.

Geochemists and paleontologists are on the lookout for “molecular fossils,” biochemicals that were resistant to breakdown even during rock-forming processes.¹ These have been discovered now in the very lowest layers of sedimentary rock, far below the Cambrian.² Certain chemicals, like some steroids made by sea sponges, indicate that sponges were present in the earliest tim

According to the record in Genesis, there was a time when the entire surface of the earth was inundated with water.