RNA Virus Genome Decay Confirms Creation | The Institute for Creation Research
RNA Virus Genome Decay Confirms Creation
Popular opinions hold that viruses can evolve into increasingly harmful versions of themselves. But science shows just the opposite. RNA viruses like influenza, Ebola, COVID-19, and measles show histories of accumulating mutations and becoming less virulent. Outbreak intensities wane with time. This trend brings good news for human health workers: This, too, shall pass. This genetic decay also confirms God’s curse on a sin-soaked creation that the Bible’s book of beginnings makes so plain.

RNA viruses encode their building and activation instructions on strands of chemicals called RNAs (ribonucleic acids). RNA “letters” lie in long strands—like words in a sentence. Viruses use a specific enzyme to copy those instructions. The enzymes make new copies of the virus’ RNA strands. The copying enzymes work with extreme efficiency, though imperfect. Virologists report mutation accumulation rates that match enzyme copying error rates. For example, 0.001 “letter” substitutions happen per site, per year.1

One insightful review highlighted the challenge that speedy viral mutation rates pose to long evolutionary timeframes. In it, Oxford zoologist Edward Holmes noted an “apparent paradox” between the measured high-speed of viral genome decay versus evolutionary eons of virus non-evolution.1

Holmes described this paradox in flaviviruses. This genus of RNA virus causes no symptoms in arthropods, like ticks and mosquitos where they originate, but do cause diseases like Zika virus when they infect humans. As usual, flaviviruses mutate too quickly for evolution. Holmes wrote, “To make the divergence of the flaviviruses correspond to the origin of the placental mammals at 100 million years ago would require a nonsynonymous rate some 4 logs lower, at 0.000000009 substitutions/site/year!”1 Nonsynonymous mutations directly alter protein code.

However, if placental mammals arose by creation only thousands of years ago, as Scripture teaches, then the time dilemma vanishes. RNA viruses look young.

So do other viruses. Holmes wrote of hepatitis B, “However, as with the primate lentiviruses [e.g., HIV], the best estimates of substitution rate suggest an evolutionary history of only a few thousand years and hence many orders of magnitude too recent for cospeciation.”1

In other words, viruses look too recent for evolution.

Holmes offered some suggestions to bridge the big gap between viral genome decay and evolutionary time requirements. Some solutions involve fiddling with variables in virus mutation models, such as having most of the mutations occur in regions that have no effect on the virus. But in the end, he admitted these proposed solutions fall short. That’s why Holmes called upon more studies of RNA virus “evolution” to help explain this mutation paradox. A 2012 report answers that call, but merely confirmed this bad news for evolution.2

The 2012 analysis tracked rapid mutation accumulation in the Spanish Flu virus (H1N1) since its origins in the late 1800’s. Its authors reported a rate of “0.0032 mutations per site per year,” right in the same order of magnitude reported in the 2003 summary.2 Spanish Flu mutated to extinction in 1957.3

Romans 8:22 says, “For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now.” Just like DNA inside all plant and animal cells, viral RNAs accumulate mutations from copying errors. They groan and labor as they decay a little more every generation.

1. Holmes, E. C. 2003. Molecular Clocks and the Puzzle of RNA Virus Origins. Journal of Virology. 77(7): 3893–3897. 2. Carter, R. W. and J. C. Sanford. 2012. A new look at an old virus: patterns of mutation accumulation in the human H1N1 influenza virus since 1918. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling. 9:42. 3. However, a sample of frozen H1N1 apparently escaped from a research lab in the 1970’s. It has mutated to near extinction.

*Dr. Brian Thomas is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in paleobiochemistry from the University of Liverpool.
The Latest
After 30 Years, Red Kites Soar in British Skies
Good news is always welcome. So, it’s good to learn of another conservation comeback. This time it’s the red kite happily soaring in Great...

Meet Dr. G
Hear the history and heart of ICR’s newly appointed President and Chief Operating Officer, Dr. Randy Guliuzza. He has served as ICR’s National...

'Doing Business' in Good Times and Bad
No doubt many of you, like me, have been earnestly looking for the return of the Lord Jesus Christ. He called all believers to be godly “salt”...

Sentinels Are Needed in Perilous Times
Watch out! Dangers lurk everywhere—these are surely perilous times.1 One of the apologetics-exhorting themes in Jude’s epistle...

Why Don't Raindrops Bomb Butterfly Wings?
Okay, I admit most folks have probably not thought to ask this creation question. But a bigger question gets answered when we examine the fantastic...

Believe Anyway
by Scott Arledge and Brian Thomas, Ph.D. Some within the creation community make the claim that they would believe God’s Word about the age...

The ICR Discovery Center for Science & Earth History Updates*
Plan your trip at ICRdiscoverycenter.org, where you’ll find ticket information, discounted rates for nearby hotels, and links to other...

Human Activity and Vertebrate Evolutionary History
God gave humans a dominion mandate1 and expects us to exercise responsible stewardship “over all the earth.”2 After...

Biological Bounceback at Mount St. Helens
Early one bright Sunday morning, Mount St. Helens looked as picturesque as it had for hundreds of years. Suddenly, an earthquake shook loose the north...

Is Creation Evidence Ambiguous?
Is evidence for creation ambiguous? Could an honest seeker of truth reasonably conclude there is no God? Is the evolutionary old-earth story a reasonable...