Our Calm Sun: Crazy Coincidence or Deliberate Design? | The Institute for Creation Research
Our Calm Sun: Crazy Coincidence or Deliberate Design?
The unique nature of the sun is causing many experts to scratch their heads.

Extensive studies show that most sun-like stars demonstrate about five times the magnetic activity of our sun. Others reveal that the stars most similar to our sun vary in brightness about twelve times more than the sun in a given solar cycle.1,2

In other words, the sun in our solar system is much more stable than other similar stars.

Why does this matter? New York Times writer Adam Mann describes what would happen if the magnetic activity of the sun were intensified like we see in other stars:

Turn up the activity of these magnetic whorls, and you get more solar storms flinging deadly charged particles and radiation throughout our solar system. If enough of these punishing waves hit a rocky planet [such as Earth], that planet might end up microwaved into a dreary condition where nothing could live.3

An unstable, magnetically hyperactive parent star would be catastrophic for life on planets orbiting that star. Having such a comparably stable, “boring” parent star makes it possible for life to exist on Earth. Even those who hold to an evolutionary worldview admit that the sun has been “stable and steadfast” for a long time,4 making everything that we see today possible.

But the question remains: Why? Why is the sun so different from other stars that share similar “masses, temperatures…chemical compositions and rotation periods”?

Secular scientists can’t agree on the answer. However, many are intellectually honest enough to admit that something special is going on. As solar physicist Ricky Egeland (employed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research) said, “It may be no coincidence that we live around a very inactive star.”1

He’s absolutely right: it’s not a coincidence. There is obvious design in nature, but we only have two options regarding who, or what, is responsible for that design.

Secular scientists, rejecting Scripture’s guidance on how to understand creation, postulate that this apparent design is an illusion. However, biblical creationists correctly recognize that the amazing design is real, and that the even-more-amazing Designer is the God of the Bible.5

As ICR’s Dr. Randy Guliuzza has stated on multiple occasions, secular science and evolutionary theory do not remove the concept of intelligent agency from our universe. They simply transfer the credit from the Creator to the creation, saying that nature is, in fact, responsible for actions and operations that were (or are) actually performed by the living God.6

The fact that we live near an incredibly stable star is not a wonderful, mysterious accident of nature. It is the genius of a creative Being who designed the sun to be a blessing, as it “rules the day.”5

References
1. Algar, J. Our sun’s power is stable and steadfast, scientists find. Tech Times. Posted on techtimes.com August 29, 2014, accessed May 1,2020.
2. The solar cycle is an extremely tiny, almost imperceptible, variation in the sun’s brightness over an eleven year period. This periodic change in brightness is accompanied by a change in the number of sunspots on the sun’s surface.
3. Mann, A. There’s Something Special About the Sun: It’s a Bit Boring. New York Times. Posted on nytimes.com April 30, 2020, accessed May 5, 2020.
4. Secular scientists think the sun’s power output has been steady for at least a hundred thousand years. Although creation scientists dispute these vast ages, the fact remains that, by any reckoning, our sun is a very stable star.
5. Genesis 1:16. In fact, the apostle Paul indicates that a failure to give God credit for His creation, despite our opportunity to see and evaluate it as unambiguous proof of His creatorship, is to do so “without excuse” (Romans 1:19-20).
6. Guliuzza, R. J. 2011. Darwin’s Sacred Imposter: Natural Selection’s Idolatrous Trap. Acts & Facts. 40(11): 12-15. See also, regarding the problem of animistic mysticism parading as “science” falsely so-called, Guliuzza, R. 2010. Natural Selection Is Not ‘Nature’s Design Process'. Acts & Facts. 39(4):10-11; Guliuzza, R. 2011. Darwin’s Sacred Imposter: How Natural Selection Is Given Credit for Design in Nature. Acts & Facts. 40(7):12-15.

*Lauren Pennington is Volunteer Coordinator at the ICR Discovery Center for Science & Earth History.
The Latest
NEWS
Fossil Chromatin Looks Young
What are the odds that a buried animal would still have intact DNA after 125 million years? Researchers publishing in the journal Communications Biology...

NEWS
Inside October 2021 Acts & Facts
How is the Lord’s handiwork on display at John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park? Does the universe look old? What can we learn about science and...

NEWS
Two-Volume Series: Restoring the Truth about Origins
The subject of origins continues to attract interest from the public and the scientific establishment. Understanding our origins informs us of who we are...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Floods Form Fossils Fast
Christy Hardy and Susan Windsor* You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with...

ACTS & FACTS
A Battle for Hearts
Since the ICR Discovery Center for Science & Earth History opened in fall of 2019, tens of thousands of people have walked through our doors. They...

APOLOGETICS
Eating Bugs Isn't Always So Simple
The Lord Jesus Christ deserves glory for why He made Earth’s diverse creatures, and He also deserves glory for the complicated details of how...

ACTS & FACTS
Does the Universe Look Old?
Since distant galaxies are billions of light-years away, some understandably assume that distant starlight must have taken billions of years to reach...

ACTS & FACTS
Hawaii Behind the Scenes
ICR Research Scientist Dr. Brian Thomas and ICR Video Producer Clint Loveness, with help from friends and family, recently shot footage in Maui, Hawaii,...

ACTS & FACTS
Mutation, Design, and Faith
Any alteration in a cell’s DNA sequence is a mutation. These changes can come from copying errors, exposure to chemicals or radiation, or from...

ACTS & FACTS
Another Function of 'Junk DNA' Discovered
For decades, evolutionists suggested that huge sections of our genome (about half) did not actively code for the production of proteins or polypeptides—and...