How Mount St. Helens Refutes Evolution | The Institute for Creation Research
How Mount St. Helens Refutes Evolution

ICR was recently pleased to host Gary Bates, CEO of Creation Ministries International-USA, for a private tour of the under-construction ICR Discovery Center for Science and Earth History.1 While we watched busy workers add greenery to the Mount St. Helens model, Gary told of a time years ago when evidence from ICR’s research of the 1980s eruptions in Washington State led him to switch from evolution to creation.

Within days of becoming a Christian, Gary began struggling to fit evolution with the Bible. His struggle ended when he saw geologist Dr. Steve Austin present ICR research on Mount St. Helens. By the end of that hour, he had learned enough geology to refute fish-to-fishermen evolution. What does a volcanic eruption have to do with belief in evolution? Gary explained his logic.

First, he learned that Mount St. Helens released the energy of 20 million tons of TNT on the morning of May 18, 1980. The blast pulverized rock and ejected tons of steam-infused ash and sediments throughout that day. Over three billion cubic yards of avalanche material slid down.2 Eventually, the muddy wreckage settled. At this point, Gary expected that the debris had settled haphazardly.

Gary Bates, center, describes his experience the first time he heard an explanation of the Mount St. Helens eruptions in light of the Genesis creation narrative.
 

But Dr. Austin spoke of a 1982 mudflow that carved deep channels through the thick 1980 deposits, exposing mud made solid in just two years. It shocked Gary to learn that the initial explosion formed distinct layers. Giant cross-beds and fine, flat layers both formed fast. He realized that it doesn’t take a million years to make layers. You just need plenty of fast-moving water.

The Mount St. Helens events only needed hours and months to form the same features found in sedimentary rocks around the world. Common features include:

— Sharp, flat contacts between layers
— Larger particles toward the bottom of a rock bed
— Cross-beds
— Steep-walled canyons
— Drainage systems
— Material moved far away before becoming part of new rock
— De-limbed, sorted, and reburied logs
— Volcanic ash mixed with mud and hardened into rock

As soon as Gary learned that rock layers can form fast, he knew Noah’s Flood could have produced enormous rock stacks in one year. We don’t need long ages to solidify sediments. But what about the age-dating schemes that supposedly prove those ages?

Within six years of the eruption, a new lava dome in the crater atop Mount St. Helens had hardened. Standard radioisotope methods pointed to an isotopic age of around 350,000 years for the 10-year-old rock.3 Gary learned then that the highly regarded radioisotope dating methods are broken.4 This made Noah’s recent Flood that much more sensible.

He reasoned that if rock layers formed fast, then the earth could be only thousands of years old—not enough time for fish to evolve into people.

The world’s rocks show evidence of rapid deposits. Erase the time and you erase evolution. Tweet: The world’s rocks show evidence of rapid deposits. Erase the time and you erase evolution.

How Mount St. Helens Refutes Evolution: https://www.icr.org/article/how-mount-st-helens-refutes-evolution/

@ICRscience @ICRdiscovery @icrbthomas @creationnews

#Geology #Science

Unimaginably long timespans form the backdrop for all evolutionary speculations. But the world’s rocks show evidence of rapid deposits. Erase the time and you erase evolution. I respect Gary for following the evidence where it led—to biblical creation and thus to the trustworthiness of the God who inspired His Holy Word.

References

  1. Based near Atlanta, Georgia, Creation Ministries International-USA promotes biblical creation.
  2. Morris, J. and S. A. Austin. 2003. Footprints in the Ash. Green River, AR: Master Books, 25.
  3. Ibid, 67.
  4. See Dr. Vernon Cupps’ book Rethinking Radiometric Dating: Evidence for a Young Earth from a Nuclear Physicist.

* Dr. Thomas is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in paleobiochemistry from the University of Liverpool.

Cite this article: Brian Thomas, Ph.D. 2019. How Mount St. Helens Refutes Evolution. Acts & Facts. 48 (6).

The Latest
NEWS
RNA Ties and Unties Itself
There are two types of nucleic acids (genetic molecules): DNA and RNA. DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is a large linear molecule designed to store genetic...

NEWS
Does Oddball Platypus Genome Reveal Its Origins?
How in the world did a creature as odd as the duck-billed platypus originate? This creature lays eggs like a reptile, has venom like a reptile, spurs like...

NEWS
Is Evolution ‘Fake Science’?
The organization BioLogos, which advocates that Christians accept secular evolutionary claims, recently published an online essay entitled “How to...

NEWS
Cambrian Explosion Alive and Well
A new editorial in GSA Today is claiming that secular scientists should cease using the term “Cambrian Explosion.”1 It’s not...

NEWS
Abraham Ate Bananas?
Since the word banana does not occur in Scripture, any evidence of bananas in ancient Middle Eastern diets would have to come from the ground. New research...

NEWS
3-D Human Genome Radically Different from Chimp
All plant and animal genomes studied so far exhibit complex and distinct three-dimensional (3-D) structures in their chromosome configurations depending...

NEWS
Amazonian Artwork and the Post-Flood Ice Age
An extensive series of South American Ice Age artwork may be of interest to biblical creationists. In 2017 and 2018, scientists discovered a nearly eight-mile-long...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Dinosaurs
You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with ICR’s special Creation Kids learning...

NEWS
Inside January 2021 Acts & Facts
How is ICR winning science and scientists back to Christ? What is the significance of fossil bone collagen discoveries? Did pterosaurs have feathers?...

ACTS & FACTS
Savvy Sons of Light
Many Christians grow uncomfortable when their pastor teaches about money. If it’s any consolation, I know many pastors who feel the same way....