Dark Matter Search Keeps Coming Up Empty | The Institute for Creation Research
Dark Matter Search Keeps Coming Up Empty
A recent study has ruled out a possible candidate for dark matter, the mysterious invisible “stuff” said to comprise 85% of the matter in our universe.1,2 The Big Bang model needs dark matter for a number of reasons. So, this is bad news for the Big Bang model.

Most secular cosmologists believe in dark matter. Some biblical creationists also think dark matter exists,3 but others (including me) are more skeptical.4 Scientists, both creationist and secular, who are skeptical of dark matter tend to think that what is being construed as evidence for dark matter is really due to an incomplete understanding of how gravity behaves over very large distances.5 Creationists who think dark matter is real point out that dark matter was not invented simply to “fix” problems with the Big Bang—astronomers were discussing the possibility of dark matter at about the same time, and even before, the Big Bang model was first proposed.

Although this is true, dark matter has nevertheless become extremely important to secular scientists. Big Bang cosmologists now invoke dark matter in their theories of galaxy formation.6 Furthermore, Big Bang cosmology demands that this dark matter be composed of exotic, never-before-detected particles. This is because, in order for the Big Bang to produce the observed abundances of helium and hydrogen, Big Bang cosmologists must assume a particular value for an adjustable parameter in their model. Once this is done, the Big Bang model can only generate enough “normal” matter (atoms) to account for about 15% of the matter thought to exist. This means that, by their reckoning, the dark matter can’t be made of atoms. But they have ruled out other forms of non-atomic matter (neutrinos, free electrons, etc.) for other reasons. This means that some exotic, new form of matter is the only remaining option.7

But the search for this exotic matter is not going very well. In the most recent disappointment, astronomers had speculated that an X-ray “glow” around distant clusters of galaxies was caused by the decay of a particular dark matter candidate called a sterile neutrino. If this were the case, then this X-ray glow should surround our own galaxy, since they think the Milky Way has its own dark matter halo. Yet this X-ray glow is absent from the Milky Way.1,2 Astroparticle physicist Ben Safdi (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) said, “It seems to be the final nail in the coffin of the dark matter interpretation [of the X-ray glow].”2

Big Bang theorists are becoming increasingly desperate to find this “missing” dark matter. Recently, some speculated that dark matter perhaps pre-dated the Big Bang somehow!8

Given the continuing woes besetting the Big Bang model, it is a wonder that so many, including so many evangelical Christians, seem to accept this model, despite its enormous scientific problems and its clear contradiction with Scripture.9,10

References
1. Desert, C. et al. 2020. The dark matter interpretation of the 3.5-keV line is inconsistent with blank-sky observations. Science. 367 (6485): 1465-1467.
2. Grossman, L. A controversial X-ray glow didn’t show up in the Milky Way’s dark matter halo. Science News. Posted on sciencenews.org March 26, 2020, accessed April 2, 2020.
3. Faulkner, D. 2017. The Case for Dark Matter. Answers Research Journal. 10: 89-101.
4. Coppedge, D. F. Will Dark Matter Hunters Ever Give Up? Creation Evolution Headlines. Posted on crev.info April 1, 2020, accessed April 3, 2020.
5. Letzter, R. 19 Galaxies Are Apparently Missing Dark Matter. No One Knows Why. Space.com. Posted on space.com December 5, 2019, accessed April 3, 2020.
6. Assembly of Galaxies. James Webb Space Telescope/Goddard Space Flight Center website. Accessed April 3, 2020.
7. Hebert, J. 2013. Dark Matter, Sparticles, and the Big Bang. Acts & Facts. 42 (9): 17-19.
8. Hebert, J. 2019. Continuing Troubles for the Big Bang Model. Acts & Facts. 48 (11).
9. Thomas, B. and J. Hebert. 2014. Does Science Support the Big Bang? Acts & Facts. 43 (7).
10. Morris, J. D. 1997. Is the Big Bang Biblical? Acts & Facts. 26 (5).

*Dr. Jake Hebert is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Texas at Dallas.
The Latest
NEWS
After 30 Years, Red Kites Soar in British Skies
Good news is always welcome. So, it’s good to learn of another conservation comeback. This time it’s the red kite happily soaring in Great...

CREATION PODCAST
Meet Dr. G
Hear the history and heart of ICR’s newly appointed President and Chief Operating Officer, Dr. Randy Guliuzza. He has served as ICR’s National...

ACTS & FACTS
'Doing Business' in Good Times and Bad
No doubt many of you, like me, have been earnestly looking for the return of the Lord Jesus Christ. He called all believers to be godly “salt”...

APOLOGETICS
Sentinels Are Needed in Perilous Times
Watch out! Dangers lurk everywhere—these are surely perilous times.1 One of the apologetics-exhorting themes in Jude’s epistle...

ACTS & FACTS
Why Don't Raindrops Bomb Butterfly Wings?
Okay, I admit most folks have probably not thought to ask this creation question. But a bigger question gets answered when we examine the fantastic...

ACTS & FACTS
Believe Anyway
by Scott Arledge and Brian Thomas, Ph.D. Some within the creation community make the claim that they would believe God’s Word about the age...

DISCOVERY CENTER
The ICR Discovery Center for Science & Earth History Updates*
Plan your trip at ICRdiscoverycenter.org, where you’ll find ticket information, discounted rates for nearby hotels, and links to other...

ACTS & FACTS
Human Activity and Vertebrate Evolutionary History
God gave humans a dominion mandate1 and expects us to exercise responsible stewardship “over all the earth.”2 After...

ACTS & FACTS
Biological Bounceback at Mount St. Helens
Early one bright Sunday morning, Mount St. Helens looked as picturesque as it had for hundreds of years. Suddenly, an earthquake shook loose the north...

ACTS & FACTS
Is Creation Evidence Ambiguous?
Is evidence for creation ambiguous? Could an honest seeker of truth reasonably conclude there is no God? Is the evolutionary old-earth story a reasonable...