Palin Slammed for Supporting Open Debate | The Institute for Creation Research

Palin Slammed for Supporting Open Debate

The Republicans threw a curve ball for the nation when John McCain announced that his vice presidential running mate would be Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. She has received a great deal of criticism on almost every aspect of her public and personal life, including her stance on the creation/evolution debate.

The issue surfaced in a 2006 debate when Palin was running for governor. Regarding presenting creationism as an alternative theory in science classrooms, Palin was quoted in the Anchorage Daily News as saying, “Teach both. You know, don’t be afraid of information.” She recounts that as the daughter of a science teacher, she learned both creationism and evolution. “It’s been a healthy foundation for me. But don’t be afraid of information and let kids debate both sides.”1

Science blogger Massimo Pigliucci cited Palin’s statements in a recent online article. “Now this is disingenuous at best,”2 he wrote. “Education is not about having ‘kids debate both sides,’ since most kids would probably conclude that the earth is flat and at the center of the universe.…Learning critical thinking is not a matter of being exposed to a ‘fair and balanced’ view of everything and be told ‘you decide.’ Rather, it proceeds through learning about logic, about assessing evidence, and about the many ways in which human senses and reasoning abilities can fail us if we are not on guard.”

Anyone would agree that the next generation of innovators and leaders must be critical thinkers in order to address the world’s problems. But against what must students be “on guard”? Logic and evaluating evidence are tools used to analyze the world around us, and so far that same logic and evaluation has led many scientists and others to believe that the evidence speaks of a Creator God rather than random chance and natural selection. Limiting how the evidence can be interpreted puts educators in the interesting position of not teaching students, but instead conditioning them to recite the “correct” answers without a second thought to other possible explanations.

According to his own self-imposed criteria, Pigiliucci claims that “‘teaching both’ [creationism and evolution] isn’t going to cut it, because creationism is simply not even in the ballpark of the best ideas ever produced by humanity. On the contrary, it is superstitious nonsense that harks back to an earlier era of ignorance about how the world works.” He further quotes Arkansas Governor Mike Hucakbee’s 2007 statement, “I believe God created the heavens and the earth.…I wasn’t there when he did it, so how he did it, I don’t know,”3 followed by the smug comment, “These are lines straight out of the Institute for Creation Research talk book….[I]f you are from Alaska, Alabama, Mississippi or a variety of other places along the Ignorance Belt you can keep falling behind in quality of life and ability to compete in a world where science plays an increasingly central role in our lives.”2

Individuals such as Pigiliucci have taken their cue from Richard Dawkins, P.Z. Meyers, and other evolutionary supporters in their active condemnation and ridicule of anyone who doesn’t agree with their own platforms. Pigiliucci doesn’t seem as interested in the Republican candidates’ actual views on the creation/evolution question—which they have been steering clear of since the primaries—as he is in having yet another stage to present his biases. Science is certainly an important issue to consider in choosing whom we want to hold the reins of our country for the next four years, but it isn’t the only one to consider. Pigiliucci would do better to stick to conducting scientific research that will help develop real solutions to real problems, rather than maligning those who value academic freedom and healthy debate.

References

  1. Kizzia, T. ‘Creation science’ enters the race. Anchorage Daily News. Posted online October 27, 2006, accessed September 3, 2008.
  2. Pigliucci, M. Is Sarah Palin a Creationist? Posted on scientificblogging.com September 1, 2008, accessed September 3, 2008.
  3. Huckabee bristles at creationism query. Associated Press, December 5, 2007.

* Ms. Dao is Assistant Editor.

Article posted on September 10, 2008.

The Latest
NEWS
Let the Fossils Speak for Themselves
When conventional scientists call a fossil an early step in animal evolution, the claim may rest more on a reading of the fossil than on the fossil...

CREATION PODCAST
Christian Biologist: My Colleagues Will NOT Be Happy I’m Sharing...
Trey sits down with Dr. Michael Boyle to talk about his time in mainstream science, what ultimately led him to the Institute for Creation Research, and...

NEWS
Drilling Down: Neanderthals Practiced Dentistry
Over 60 years ago, conventional scientists taught that Neanderthals were slouching, subhuman brutes—just another evolutionary link bridging the...

NEWS
T. rex Engineered with Small Arms to Balance Its Large Head
Conventional scientists have been baffled for many years by the small arms of Tyrannosaurus rex. To many, they just seem disproportionately small compared...

NEWS
The Creator Behind American Liberty
Every Fourth of July, Americans celebrate freedom with flags, fireworks, and familiar words, such as this line from the Declaration of Independence,...

NEWS
America's 250th Birthday
The United States of America is officially 250 years old! Most Americans celebrate and thank God for reaching such a milestone. After all, the history...

NEWS
U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Aligns with Genesis Gender Distinctions
On Tuesday, June 30, the Supreme Court ruled to uphold the rights of West Virginia and Idaho to ban transgender women, who are biological males, from...

NEWS
July Wallpaper
"Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. (1 Corinthians 3:17, NKJV) ICR's July...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Galaxies
Hi, kids! We created a special Acts & Facts page just for you! Have fun doing the activities while learning about the wonderful world...

APOLOGETICS
Is Truth Real? If So, Can We Know It?
by Patrick C . Marks, D. Min., and Brian Thomas, Ph.D.* Truth matters. Without truth, no one can say for certain that anything is right or wrong,...