The Second Man | The Institute for Creation Research

The Second Man

“The first man is of the earth, earthy: The second man is the Lord from heaven” (I Corinthians 15:47).

Paleoanthropologists, seeking to trace man’s supposed evolutionary ancestry, have widely different opinions as to the when and how of it. As one evolutionist has recently lamented: “Paleoanthropologists seem to make up for a lack of fossils with an excess of fury, and this must now be the only science in which it is still possible to become famous just by having an opinion.”

There is no need to speculate. The Bible solves the problem when it speaks of “the first man Adam” (I Corinthians 15:45) and says that Eve “was the mother of all living” (Genesis 3:20). There were no “pre-Adamite men” (as even some Christians have alleged, hoping thereby to accommodate evolutionary speculations).

Adam, alone, was “the first man,” and he had been formed directly by God “of the dust of the ground” (Genesis 2:7)—that is, out of the same basic elements as those in the earth (carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, etc.). He was “earthy,” like the materials of Earth. But, then, how can Jesus Christ, who is “the Lord from heaven” be “the second man?” Adam had millions of male descendants before Jesus was born.

The answer can only be that He was “the second man” in the same way that Adam was “the first man.” That is, His human body, like that of Adam, was directly made by God, from Earth’s elements—not produced by reproduction, like all other men. He was “made flesh” (John 1:14), but only made “in the likeness of sinful flesh,” for He must not inherit the sinful flesh of His human parents, if He is to “condemn sin in the flesh” (Romans 8:3). “A body hast thou prepared me,” He said (Hebrews 10:5), and as the angel told Mary: “That holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God” (Luke 1:35). HMM

The Latest
CREATION PODCAST
Dr. Timothy Clarey | How Faith Shaped His Scientific Journey...
ICR’s science staff have spent more than 50 years researching scientific evidence that refutes evolutionary philosophy...

NEWS
Ant Super Smell: A Masterclass in God's Genetic Engineering
To an ant, the world is written in scent—and they read it with uncanny precision. A single colony can recognize thousands of chemical cues that...

NEWS
Subsurface Oceans on Two Uranian Moons?
A team of researchers led by University of North Dakota planetary scientist Dr. Caleb Strom concluded that the two Uranian moons Ariel and Miranda (directly...

NEWS
Slowing Plates Support High Flood Boundary
Flood geologists have predicted that plate motion slowed at the end of the Flood year, and now conventional scientists are finding it to be true. A...

NEWS
Microscopic Ingenuity: Stentor and the Case for Intelligent Design
What if the smallest creatures held the biggest clues to life’s design? A 2025 study in Nature Physics investigates the remarkable behaviors of...

CREATION PODCAST
Dr. Jeff Tomkins | A Scientist's Journey to Creationism | The...
ICR’s science staff have spent more than 50 years researching scientific evidence that refutes evolutionary philosophy...

NEWS
Early Fish Evolution?
The discovery of a new species of a plant or animal would probably not spark much excitement to the non-scientist. But in this case, the conditions...

NEWS
Make Plans to Attend Our Estate Planning Workshop at the Discovery...
Did you know that up to 75% of Americans over 18 have no retirement or estate plans? Don’t wait to prepare for the future. Join us on Saturday, October...

NEWS
Fossil Confusion in Ethiopia: Are Evolutionary Trees Built on...
A new study published in Nature describes the discovery of 13 fossilized teeth from the Ledi-Geraru site in Ethiopia. They have been dated to between...

NEWS
The Only Mesozoic Dragonfly in Canada—Is a Dragonfly
In 2023, an undergraduate student from McGill University discovered a new dragonfly species in Alberta, Canada. In fact, “This is the first ever...