The Tail of Man’s Supposed Ancestors | The Institute for Creation Research


The Tail of Man’s Supposed Ancestors

Although it has been known for decades and despite insistence to the contrary from the evolutionary community, man—Homo sapiens—has never had a tail.1–3

Recently, science writer Jennifer Zieba stated in LiveScience, “Approximately 25 million years ago, an ancestor of both humans and apes genetically diverged from monkeys and lost its tail.”4 This supposed evolutionary event would have happened in the unobserved past and has left no paleontological evidence. Our subhuman ancestor is unknown, and there is no sign of the alleged first apes (having no tail) splitting from the Old World monkeys so long ago.5

Zieba went on to say, “Researchers discover a potential genetic connection between humans’ tail loss and a type of birth defect” (emphasis added).4

This LiveScience article also addressed repetitive DNA sequences that can produce portions of RNA called Alu elements (transposable elements or TEs).

These ‘transposable elements,’ or jumping genes, can disrupt or enhance a gene’s function upon insertion. This specific type of jumping gene exists only in primates and has been driving genetic diversity for millions of years.4

The last sentence above has both good science and a faith statement. Yes, transposable elements of different types and functions are found in nearly all plants and animals, but there’s no way one can assert these genetic features have been influencing evolution for millions of years. That is assumed and must be taken by faith. And like everything else, “The evolutionary origin of TEs is uncertain.”6

Creationists see TEs as playing, among other important functions, a purposeful and vital role in gene regulation.7 A group of evolutionists stated in a recent issue of Nature, “Here we present evidence that an individual insertion of an Alu element [originally labeled jumping gene] in the genome of the hominoid ancestor may have contributed to tail-loss evolution” (emphasis added).8

Aside from a possible internal genetic change, Xia et al. appeal to strange external “pressures” and strong “selective advantage” to make their cryptic case for our tail loss.

The specific evolutionary pressures relating to the loss of the tail in hominoids are not clear, although they are probably involved in enhanced locomotion in the transition to a non-arboreal lifestyle. We suggest, however, that the selective advantage must have been strong because the loss of the tail may have included an evolutionary trade-off of neural tube defects, as demonstrated by the presence of neural-tube-closure defects in mice expressing the TbxtΔexon6 transcript.8 (Emphasis added.)

Xia et al. also stated, “The loss of the tail is inferred to have occurred around 25 million years ago when the hominoid lineage diverged from the ancient Old-World monkeys, leaving only 3–5 caudal vertebrae to form the coccyx, or tailbone, in modern humans.”8 The evolutionary authors do not address the great importance of the coccyx because it wouldn’t help their insistence that our ancestors lost their tail.

The coccyx, or tailbone, is an important part of the spinal column. It not only aids in upright sitting posture (ask anyone who has bruised or broken their coccyx!), but it is also the site of muscle attachment for the defecation process.

Keep in mind that “the genetic mechanism that facilitated either tail-loss evolution or orthograde and bipedal locomotion in hominoids remains unknown.”8 Creationists predict that these genetic mechanisms will always be unknown since man was created to walk upright in the beginning just thousands of years ago.9

To conclude, Scripture clearly teaches God created mankind unique and distinct from the animal world. The supposed ancient evolutionary relatives of man never had tails.10

References

  1. Morris, J. 1993. Why Do Some Babies Show “Animal” Characteristics? Acts & Facts. 22 (1).
  2. Morris, J. 1989. Does the Human Embryo Go through Animal Stages? Acts & Facts. 18 (8).
  3. Guliuzza, R. 2016. Major Evolutionary Blunders: Haeckel’s Embryos Born of Evolutionary Imagination. Acts & Facts. 45 (11): 16–18.
  4. Zieba, J. We finally know why humans don’t have tails. LiveScience. Posted on livescience.com February 29, 2024, accessed March 10, 2024.
  5. Tomkins, J. Monkey Fossil Confirms Neogene-Quaternary Flood Boundary. Creation Science Update. Posted on ICR.org April 30, 2020, accessed March 10, 2024.
  6. Futuyma, D. and M. Kirkpatrick. 2017. Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 363.
  7. Tomkins, J. 2023. Transposable Elements: Genomic Parasites or Engineered Design? Acts & Facts. 52 (5): 14–18.
  8. Xia, B. et al. 2024. On the genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes. Nature. 626: 1042–48.
  9. Sherwin, F. Man: Created to Walk Upright. Creation Science Update. Posted on ICR.org May 8, 2023, accessed March 8, 2024.
  10. Gish, D. 1983. Evolution and the Human Tail. Acts & Facts. 12 (3).

* Dr. Sherwin is science news writer at the Institute for Creation Research. He earned an M.A. in zoology from the University of Northern Colorado and received an Honorary Doctorate of Science from Pensacola Christian College.

The Latest
NEWS
Secular Paper Admits ''Unreasonable Likelihood'' of Abiogenesis
A recent popular science article begins with the words, “A new study published in July 2025 tackles one of science’s most profound mysteries...

NEWS
September 2025 ICR Wallpaper
"Woe to him who strives with his Maker! Let the potsherd strive with the potsherds of the earth! Shall the clay say to him who forms it, ‘What...

ACTS & FACTS
Pervasive Genome Functionality Destroys the Myth of Junk DNA
In 2001, the first rough draft of the human genome was published in a collaborative effort between private industry and the public sector.1,2...

NEWS
Happy Labor Day 2025
“For we are laborers together with God: ye are God’s husbandry, ye are God’s building.” (1 Corinthians 3:9) Labor Day was...

ACTS & FACTS
The Age of Reptiles Myth
We hear about the Age of Reptiles, also called the Age of Dinosaurs, almost as early as we can understand the idea. Even kindergarteners might be taught...

ACTS & FACTS
The Tiktaalik Missing Link Myth
In 2004, the paleontological community—and the world—was presented with what many evolutionists considered to be a dyed-in-the-wool missing...

ACTS & FACTS
Archaeopteryx, Myth of a Transitional Fossil
In 1860, one year after the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, a wonderfully preserved fossil feather was discovered in...

ACTS & FACTS
Busting the Myth about Lucy
by Brian Thomas, Ph.D., and Chris Rupe, Ph.D.* Most folks consider our ape ancestry as established science, with Lucy as the main link. However,...

ACTS & FACTS
Evolutionary Vestigial Features: Worse Than Myth, a Scam
Due to teachers’ influence during the formative years of young people’s lives, they can be a powerful force in spreading evolution to new...

ACTS & FACTS
Blind Cavefish Unmask the Convergent Evolution Myth
Within the ever-expanding theory of evolution, there is a system of specialized language designed to identify each major interpretative concept. Some...