Confronting a Clever Classroom Con | The Institute for Creation Research

Confronting a Clever Classroom Con

Many Christian students in secular universities can relate to this scenario: An evolutionist college professor is doing his best to convince his class that biblical creation is absurd. To this end, he peppers students with challenging questions: How can you see distant starlight in a young universe? If there was a global flood, where did all the water come from? Where did it go?

One of the unspoken assumptions behind this barrage of questions is that you shouldn’t hold a particular worldview unless you know the answers to all possible objections. If a student can’t answer on the spot every objection the instructor throws out, it’s seen as evidence that biblical creation is inherently irrational.

However, this is an intellectual con job. Knowing the answers to all possible questions would require perfect knowledge, which none of us possesses. If one follows this logic to its natural conclusion, it means that no one—evolutionist or creationist—is allowed to hold any kind of worldview! But how can you live your life without some kind of belief system? How can you function if you can’t trust the information coming from your senses? And why even bother to do science or anything else if you think the world is an illusion?1

Of course, evolutionist professors who challenge biblical creation don’t hold themselves to the same standard they impose on their Christian students. They insist that living things somehow arose from non-living chemicals, yet they have no idea how this happened.2,3 Despite this enormous unanswered question at the very foundation of their belief system, you can be sure evolutionist academics don’t consider their worldview to be irrational.

Unfortunately, many Christians also won’t consider biblical creation unless they get all the questions answered ahead of time. This “wait and see” approach results from a lack of faith in God’s Word. Furthermore, although it may seem intellectual, the approach has a huge practical problem. Our limited knowledge makes it impossible for any of us to answer all questions up front.

Actually, creation scientists have excellent reasons for their “bias” in favor of biblical creation. There is zero scientific evidence that life can or ever did arise from non-living chemicals. Evolutionists acknowledge that living things appear designed, although they vehemently deny this is the case.4 The billions of fossils found in water-deposited rock layers all over the world are exactly what one would expect from the global Flood described in Genesis 6–9, as are the hundreds of traditions and stories of this catastrophic event in cultures throughout the world.5,6

Biblical creation makes far better sense of the big picture of Earth history than does the evolutionary story. Creation scientists have already answered many questions and objections simply by taking the Bible’s narrative at face value. Yes, questions remain, but we’ll never correctly answer them by starting from a flawed evolutionary premise. Those who accept evolutionary ideas should quit leaning on their own understanding (Proverbs 3:5-6) and instead trust the words of the perfectly truthful, all-knowing, all-powerful Creator. Genesis really does have the answers.

References

  1. For a more detailed discussion of this topic, see Lisle, J. 2011. The Ultimate Proof of Creation. Green Forest, AR: Master Books.
  2. Horgan, J. Pssst! Don’t tell the creationists, but scientists don’t have a clue how life began. Scientific American. Posted on blogs.scientificamerica.com February 28, 2011, accessed July 29, 2019.
  3. Esson, A. $5 Million Tech Prize Seeks Answer to Origin of Life. Front Line Genomics. Posted on frontlinegenomics.com March 1, 2018, accessed August 1, 2019.
  4. Guliuzza. R. 2011. Evaluating Real vs. Apparent Design. Acts & Facts. 40 (1): 10-11.
  5. Morris, J. 2012. The Global Flood. Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research.
  6. Morris, J. 2014. Traditions of a Global Flood. Acts & Facts. 43 (11): 15.

* Dr. Jake Hebert is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Texas at Dallas.

Cite this article: Jake Hebert, Ph.D. 2019. Confronting a Clever Classroom Con. Acts & Facts. 48 (9).

The Latest
NEWS
Subsurface Oceans on Two Uranian Moons?
A team of researchers led by University of North Dakota planetary scientist Dr. Caleb Strom concluded that the two Uranian moons Ariel and Miranda (directly...

NEWS
Slowing Plates Support High Flood Boundary
Flood geologists have predicted that plate motion slowed at the end of the Flood year, and now conventional scientists are finding it to be true. A...

NEWS
Microscopic Ingenuity: Stentor and the Case for Intelligent Design
What if the smallest creatures held the biggest clues to life’s design? A 2025 study in Nature Physics investigates the remarkable behaviors of...

CREATION PODCAST
Dr. Jeff Tomkins | A Scientist's Journey to Creationism | The...
ICR’s science staff have spent more than 50 years researching scientific evidence that refutes evolutionary philosophy...

NEWS
Early Fish Evolution?
The discovery of a new species of a plant or animal would probably not spark much excitement to the non-scientist. But in this case, the conditions...

NEWS
Make Plans to Attend Our Estate Planning Workshop at the Discovery...
Did you know that up to 75% of Americans over 18 have no retirement or estate plans? Don’t wait to prepare for the future. Join us on Saturday, October...

NEWS
Fossil Confusion in Ethiopia: Are Evolutionary Trees Built on...
A new study published in Nature describes the discovery of 13 fossilized teeth from the Ledi-Geraru site in Ethiopia. They have been dated to between...

NEWS
The Only Mesozoic Dragonfly in Canada—Is a Dragonfly
In 2023, an undergraduate student from McGill University discovered a new dragonfly species in Alberta, Canada. In fact, “This is the first ever...

CREATION PODCAST
Dr. Jake Hebert | Journey to ICR | The Creation Podcast: Episode...
ICR’s science staff have spent more than 50 years researching scientific evidence that refutes evolutionary philosophy...

NEWS
Oldest Evidence of Butterflies
Insects such as the ubiquitous butterfly belong to the huge phylum Arthropoda (creatures having paired, jointed appendages and a chitinous exoskeleton)....