Please see Impact No. 95.

For your convenience, Parts I (Impact No. 95) and II (Impact No. 96) have been included together in Impact No. 95.

This impact pamphlet was written by a scientist, and a science educator, and reviewed by an attorney, to provide a brief summary of the scientific evidence supporting creation. The text materials and references listed at the end together give a more thorough discussion of this scientific evidence.

Introduction

Prigogine's speculative model is enshrouded with a considerable
amount of complex mathematics that is difficult if not impossible
to understand by nonmathematicians. This immediately renders it
incomprehensible to most scientists, certainly to most biologists.

Ever since Darwin first put forth his theory, creation scientists have maintained that at best natural selection could only be a conservative force, weeding out the unfit, but would be powerless to generate increasing complexity and to originate something new or novel and thus powerless to change one kind of animal into another.