The Institute for Creation Research has long identified Neandertals as fully human.¹ But for decades, evolutionists had labeled this extinct variety of humankind as sub-human, alleging that they had eaten mostly meat.

NASA announced recently that its famous Martian rover, Curiosity, conducted its latest set of experiments to investigate "how Mars may have lost" its ancient thicker atmosphere.¹ But NASA scientists didn't design Curiosity to test whether or not Mars had a thicker ancient atmosphere, and their reasons for doing these experiments may have little to do with science.

Finding dinosaur DNA is as unthinkable to an evolutionist as finding a flat earth would be to a geographer. Thus, a recent report of possible dinosaur DNA promises to meet resistance, even as similar past reports received.¹ What is the best interpretation of all the relevant evidence?