The Failure of U-Th-Pb "Dating"; at Koongarra, Australia

Download PDFDownload The Failure of U-Th-Pb "Dating"; at Koongarra, Australia PDF

Published in: CEN Technical Journal, volume 9, number 1, pp. 71–92, 1995.

© 1995 Answers in Genesis A. C. N. 010 120 304. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

As with other radiometric “dating” methods, the U-Pb and Pb-Pb isochron methods have been questioned in the open literature, because often an excellent line of best fit between ratios obtained from a set of good cogenetic samples gives a resultant “isochron” and yields a derived “age” that has no geological meaning. At the Koongarra uranium deposit, Australia, there is ample evidence of open system behavior, or repeated migration, of U and Pb—ore textures, mineral chemistry, supergene alteration, uranium/daughter disequilibrium, and groundwater and soil geochemistry. Yet U-Th-Pb isotopic studies of the uranium ore, host rocks, and soils have produced an array of false “isochrons” that yield “ages” which are geologically meaningless. Even a claimed near-concordant U-Pb “age” of 862 Ma (million years) on one uraninite grain is identical to a false Pb-Pb isochron “age,” but neither can be connected to any geological event. The open system behavior of the U-Th-Pb system is clearly the norm, as is the resultant mixing of radiogenic Pb with “common” or background Pb, even in soils in the surrounding region, apparently even up to 17 km away! Because no geologically meaningful results can be interpreted from the U-Th-Pb data at Koongarra (three uraninite grains even yield a 232Th/208Pb “age” of 0 Ma), serious questions must be asked about the validity of the fundamental/foundational basis of the U-Th-Pb “dating” method. This makes the task of creationists building their model for the geological record much easier, since claims of U-Th-Pb radiometric “dating” having “proven” the claimed great antiquity of the earth, its strata and fossils can be justifiably ignored.

Keywords

Radiometric Dating, U-Pb and Pb-Pb Isochron Methods, Koongarra, Uranium Deposit, Open-System Behavior, Ore Textures, Mineral Chemistry, Supergene Alteration, Uranium-Daughter Disequilibrium, Groundwater and Soil Geochemistry, Uraninites, Galenas, False Isochrons, Mixing, Zero “Ages”

For Full Text

Please see the Download PDF link above for the entire article.

The Latest
TESTIMONIALS
The True History of the World
Hello, I’m Nathan Berryman, Comptroller in ICR’s accounting office. ICR’s mission is more important than ever as attacks on the authority...

NEWS
Save the Date for Giving Tuesday 2018!
We’re entering the season of giving, and what better gift to give than the truth of God’s Word. Will you help us reach your family, friends,...

NEWS
Radio Interview: Why Our Origins Matter
Leading up to ICR’s conference in Boston this weekend, Dr. Randy Guliuzza discusses why what we believe about origins matters to our understanding...

TESTIMONIALS
The Only Reasonable Explanation
Hi, my name is Lauren Pennington, and I work in the accounting department here at ICR. Many in our culture today wholeheartedly accept evolution...

CREATION PODCAST
Evaluating Evolution
Does what we believe about origins matter? ICR Science Writer and speaker Brian Thomas discusses the evidence that persuaded him to reject evolution...