Something Fishy about Global Warming Claims | The Institute for Creation Research
Something Fishy about Global Warming Claims

After the Flood, God promised Noah that Earth would have predictable patterns of climates and seasons: “While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, winter and summer, and day and night shall not cease.”1 This promise is trustworthy because God is trustworthy, and He controls Earth’s climates and seasons.

This promise is trustworthy because God is trustworthy, and He controls Earth’s climates and seasons. Tweet: This promise is trustworthy because God is trustworthy, and He controls Earth’s climates and seasons.

Something Fishy about Global Warming Claims: http://www.icr.org/article/10460/

@icrscience

But recently God’s promise has been distrusted, doubted, and denied by many who assert that human activities are so out of control we should fear the loss of previously stable climate patterns. In effect, these alarmists ignore God’s promise and His sovereign control, as if humans can determine the destiny of Earth’s climate.

But what if government reports support notions of man-made global warming and an upcoming climate crisis? Would that prove God has lost His stabilizing grip on Earth’s environmental parameters? Consider the Alaska pollock, the cod-like whitefish some say is now the number one money finfish in America’s food industry. Huge pollock populations once filled certain areas of the Bering Sea and North Pacific, but the southern edge of their range is shrinking. Some suggest the pollocks are migrating north due to climate change.2 Is this the case?

Marine biologists and biogeography ecologists study regional changes in oceanic fish populations.2,3

We expect fish stocks to naturally fluctuate with changes in climate [such as when Baltic herring relocated about A.D. 1300 as the Medieval Warm Period transitioned into the Little Ice Age]. Usually, during periods of warming or cooling, fish stocks residing at the polar ends of the population’s range increase or decrease accordingly, while the reverse happens at the other end.2

If huge populations of Alaska pollock relocate north or south, that migration’s cause is a big deal—not just for the food industry but also because global warming advocacy is a billion-dollar industry. Government-funded research projects often depend upon climate change theories.2

Pollock are sorted on board the NOAA ship Miller Freeman during a 2007 assessment.
Image credit: Copyright © 2007. I. Spies. Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Used in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holder.

However, government databases are not immune to error. Scientific analyses cannot have stronger validity than their underlying data. Misinformation can multiply when filtered through multiple users. Database errors accrue and snowball, infecting and proliferating into multi-generational “viral” outcomes, due in part to “veneer review” and statistics-distorting cherry-picking.2-4 When billions of dollars hang in the balance, both scientific research (i.e., observing and collecting data) and scientific analysis (i.e., sorting and interpreting data) are vulnerable to compromise and corruption.2,4

Government databases on the fishing industry rely on at-sea reporting that includes inspector monitoring of fishing quotas.2 However, the information the inspectors collect can be unreliable.

We discovered that our estimates [of the total catch tonnage] were about double the catches reported to us. All signs pointed to tampering of the scales.…The catcher boats now delivered [at different places] and at all hours. Previously they had delivered to one main site on the [mothership] deck and only during daylight hours.5

Dishonest commercial fishermen habitually underreport catches, deceptively circumventing inspector audits. Commercial fishing motherships often obstruct or evade monitors, sometimes reporting only half the catches received.1,3 Consequently, government databases misreport the real situation.

Should further research, farther north, be looked at to see if climate change is really causing the pollock population to migrate northward? Could it be the cause-and-effect reality is embarrassingly simple and overlooked6 as evolutionists rush to blame global warming for yet another ecosystem alteration?

In the case of pollock, several stocks at either end of their range in the north Pacific Ocean have decreased recently, leading to suspicion of overfishing as the primary cause for the population decreases.2

Despite what popular science purports to show, we can rely on God’s Word. Tweet: Despite what popular science purports to show, we can rely on God’s Word.

Something Fishy about Global Warming Claims: http://www.icr.org/article/10460/

@icrscience

This is but one example of how careful fact-finding refutes global warming alarmism, corroborating God’s promise in Genesis 8:22. Despite what popular science purports to show, we can rely on God’s Word.

References

  1. Genesis 8:22. Notice that God made this climatology-relevant promise to both humanity and the animals who survived the Flood.
  2. Bailey, K. M. 2013. Billion-Dollar Fish: The Untold Story of Alaska Pollock. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2-44, 46-88, 199-215; quotation from page 16.
  3. Miles, E. et al. 1982. The Management of Marine Regions: The North Pacific. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 160-165, 172, 184-193, 220-223; Kasahara, H. 1972. Japanese Distant-Water Fisheries: A Review. Fishery Bulletin. 70 (2): 227-282.
  4. Guliuzza, R. J. 2009. Consensus Science: The Rise of a Scientific Elite. Acts & Facts. 38 (5): 4; Johnson, J. J. S. 2015. Forensic Science Frustrated by “Peer Review.” Acts & Facts. 44 (2): 18; Johnson, J. J. S. 2015. Cherry Picking Data Is the Pits. Acts & Facts. 44 (7): 19. See also Proverbs 20:10, 23; Micah 6:11.
  5. Bailey, Billion-Dollar Fish, 4.
  6. Johnson, J. J. S. 2014. Pine Needles, Limes, and Other Simple Solutions. Creation Research Society Quarterly. 50 (3): 193-194.

* Dr. Johnson is Associate Professor of Apologetics and Chief Academic Officer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: James J. S. Johnson, J.D., Th.D. 2018. Something Fishy about Global Warming Claims. Acts & Facts. 47 (3).

The Latest
NEWS
Fossil Chromatin Looks Young
What are the odds that a buried animal would still have intact DNA after 125 million years? Researchers publishing in the journal Communications Biology...

NEWS
Inside October 2021 Acts & Facts
How is the Lord’s handiwork on display at John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park? Does the universe look old? What can we learn about science and...

NEWS
Two-Volume Series: Restoring the Truth about Origins
The subject of origins continues to attract interest from the public and the scientific establishment. Understanding our origins informs us of who we are...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Floods Form Fossils Fast
Christy Hardy and Susan Windsor* You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with...

ACTS & FACTS
A Battle for Hearts
Since the ICR Discovery Center for Science & Earth History opened in fall of 2019, tens of thousands of people have walked through our doors. They...

APOLOGETICS
Eating Bugs Isn't Always So Simple
The Lord Jesus Christ deserves glory for why He made Earth’s diverse creatures, and He also deserves glory for the complicated details of how...

ACTS & FACTS
Does the Universe Look Old?
Since distant galaxies are billions of light-years away, some understandably assume that distant starlight must have taken billions of years to reach...

ACTS & FACTS
Hawaii Behind the Scenes
ICR Research Scientist Dr. Brian Thomas and ICR Video Producer Clint Loveness, with help from friends and family, recently shot footage in Maui, Hawaii,...

ACTS & FACTS
Mutation, Design, and Faith
Any alteration in a cell’s DNA sequence is a mutation. These changes can come from copying errors, exposure to chemicals or radiation, or from...

ACTS & FACTS
Another Function of 'Junk DNA' Discovered
For decades, evolutionists suggested that huge sections of our genome (about half) did not actively code for the production of proteins or polypeptides—and...