New Finds Reveal Fully-Human Neandertal | The Institute for Creation Research

New Finds Reveal Fully-Human Neandertal

The case for Neandertals as more primitive members of an evolutionary continuum that spans from apes to modern man continues to weaken. Genetic and archaeological finds are completely reshaping modern concepts of Neandertal men and women.

Researchers interested in unraveling humanity's past recently sequenced a female Neandertal's ancient DNA and published their results in Nature.1 The research included sequences that closely matched: Neandertal, Denisovan, modern man, plus an unidentified variation of man. The study authors suspected that these different groups interbred. Just as prior studies showed, this one confirmed that similarities between Neandertal and other human DNA sequences place "Miss Neandertal" inside human kind.2

In the context of biblical history, ancient families founded tribes and nations soon after their dispersal from the Tower of Babel. It appears these ancient people showed much wider variation in genetic and physical differences than the more limited range found across today's human populations.3 If accurate, then we would fully expect Neandertal peoples to have been able to interbreed with other post-Babel peoples.

Archaeology also confirms this biblical perspective. Though about 40 Neandertal graves show intentional and ritual burial rites, many scientists remain intent on defending their long-held position that Neandertals were too primitive—too ape-like—to bury their dead so reverently. They ask for more proof that the Neandertal remains had not been altered after death to merely give the appearance of non-accidental burial.

A group of mostly French researchers published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences their careful removal of sediments above and around a Neandertal skeleton from the famous La Chapelle-aux-Saints cave, clearly refuting the critics.4 The Neandertal's remains had not been tampered with since it was intentionally and ritualistically buried. This ceremony reflects the Neandertals' clear reverence and honor for the dead. Again the researchers found that Neandertals were fully human, with all the physical and spiritual dimensions of modern man. And if Neandertals were peers and relatives of modern people, then they were not our evolutionary ancestors.

In a separate systematic review of Neandertal archaeology published in PLoS ONE, a pair of researchers found that the "Neandertal archaeological record is not different enough to explain the demise in terms of inferiority in archaeologically visible domains."5 Why would Neandertal archaeology look indistinguishable from other human burials unless they were all essentially human—not in various stages of becoming human—just as biblical history would lead us to understand? Evolutionary ancestors? No, archaeology and Miss Neandertal's DNA confirm that Neandertals were our neighbors. Miss Neandertal was one of us.

References

  1. Prüfer, K., et al. 2014. The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature. 505 (7481): 43-49.
  2. Tomkins, J. Neandertal DNA Research Confirms Full Human Status. Creation Science Update. Posted on icr.org November 16, 2012, accessed August 8, 2014.
  3. Thomas, B. and F. Sherwin. Human-like Fossil Menagerie Stuns Scientists. Creation Science Update. Posted on icr.org November 8, 2013, accessed August 8, 2014.
  4. Rendu W., et al. 2014. Evidence supporting an intentional Neandertal burial at La Chapelle-aux-Saints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(1): 81-86.
  5. Villa, P., and W. Roebroeks. 2014. Neandertal Demise: An Archaeological Analysis of the Modern Human Superiority Complex. PLoS ONE. 9 (4): e96424.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Image credit: Collections Ville de Périgueux, Musée d'Art et d'Archéologie du Périgord: Inv. 85.3. Adapted for use in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders.

Article posted on August 25, 2014.

The Latest
NEWS
ICR's New In-Depth Science Book: Chimps and Humans
Evolutionists frequently claim that human and chimp DNA are over 98% similar. They need this percentage to support their hypothesis that humans and...

NEWS
Fossil Chromatin Looks Young
What are the odds that a buried animal would still have intact DNA after 125 million years? Researchers publishing in the journal Communications Biology...

NEWS
Inside October 2021 Acts & Facts
How is the Lord’s handiwork on display at John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park? Does the universe look old? What can we learn about science and...

NEWS
Two-Volume Series: Restoring the Truth about Origins
The subject of origins continues to attract interest from the public and the scientific establishment. Understanding our origins informs us of who we are...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Floods Form Fossils Fast
Christy Hardy and Susan Windsor* You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with...

ACTS & FACTS
A Battle for Hearts
Since the ICR Discovery Center for Science & Earth History opened in fall of 2019, tens of thousands of people have walked through our doors. They...

APOLOGETICS
Eating Bugs Isn't Always So Simple
The Lord Jesus Christ deserves glory for why He made Earth’s diverse creatures, and He also deserves glory for the complicated details of how...

ACTS & FACTS
Does the Universe Look Old?
Since distant galaxies are billions of light-years away, some understandably assume that distant starlight must have taken billions of years to reach...

ACTS & FACTS
Hawaii Behind the Scenes
ICR Research Scientist Dr. Brian Thomas and ICR Video Producer Clint Loveness, with help from friends and family, recently shot footage in Maui, Hawaii,...

ACTS & FACTS
Mutation, Design, and Faith
Any alteration in a cell’s DNA sequence is a mutation. These changes can come from copying errors, exposure to chemicals or radiation, or from...