Length of the Cretaceous Year Still Leaves Questions | The Institute for Creation Research
Length of the Cretaceous Year Still Leaves Questions
Recently, a team of geochemists from Belgium reported that days might have been 30 minutes shorter in the Late Cretaceous compared to today, giving 372 days in a year.1 They published their results in Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology, basing their conclusions on growth patterns in an extinct bivalve called a rudist clam. But is it really true that the Earth had 372 days each year in the past?

Many secular scientists have thought the day was shorter in the past.2 And many creationists have speculated that the length of the day was slightly different in the past too, but possibly longer, suggesting that the pre-Flood year had only 360 days.

This latest study used a mollusk from Campanian (Upper Cretaceous) rocks in Oman, claimed to be about 80 million years old.1 The scientists analyzed a single fossil shell of the species Torreites sanchezi.

Previous studies have primarily relied on visual counting of perceived daily and annual growth lines. However, the current study used a combination of visual counting, a mathematical averaging and various trace chemical analyses on the nanometer scale. Recent advances in technology enabled the research team to sample trace element ratios even at the high resolution of 10 nanometers.1 Senior author Niels de Winter told Gizmodo,

Previous estimates were based on counting daily laminae [growth layers] similar to the ones we did chemical analyses on. This [previous] counting yielded roughly the same number of days per year, but with different countings yielding differences up to 10 days due to human error and the difficulty in recognizing daily layers by eye.2

The Belgium team determined that identifiable daily patterns in the rudist shell repeated on the order of 40 nanometers. This was interpreted as the daily growth “ring” for the mollusk. They also claimed to have resolved seasonal and annual markings.1 The secular scientists assumed that these repeating cycles were daily cycles of light intensity (day and night).

De Winter explained:

Trees deposit a layer of wood every year, and you can see these layers when you cut a slice out of a tree. By counting the layers from the outside towards the inside of the tree stump, one can estimate the tree’s age. In a similar way, we could count the days and years in Torreites sanchezi by counting the layers. Our chemical analyses of the layers allowed us to do this with great precision and take away the error that occurs when counting these layers by eye through a microscope.2

However, many trees can and do form more than one tree ring per year.3 Is it possible some of these claimed daily cycles could have also formed more often too? But let’s examine their results. How compelling are they?

When the geochemists compiled all the data from all three methods, they determined that 372 laminae (daily growth rings) were deposited per year with an uncertainty of 8.4 days.1 In fact, the chemical data itself, which they believe to be most accurate, gave 373 laminae per year with an error of 12 laminae per year either way.1 That means the number of days in the Late Cretaceous year could have been anywhere between 361 to 385.

The scientists also used their newly derived data in combination with previous tidal models to estimate the Earth-Moon distance for the Late Cretaceous. They calculated the moon was only about 237,985 miles away from Earth in the Cretaceous.1 Today, the moon is about 238,900 miles from Earth. However, this is not totally unexpected.

I did a few “back of the envelope” calculations to help us understand all of this. Let’s assume the Late Cretaceous rudist fossil that was studied is really 80 million years old, and the moon has receded 915 miles since that time. This gives us an average rate of recession since the Cretaceous of only 1.8 cm/year. This is less than half today’s rate.2

As stated by de Winter,

Indeed, Earth’s spin is slowing down, and the days are getting longer, owing to the tidal effects exerted by our natural satellite. At the same time, the Moon is steadily drifting away to the tune of 3.8 centimeters (1.5 inches) per year. At this rate, the Moon should’ve been inside the Earth some 1.4 billion years ago, which obviously is not possible. The Moon is considerably older than this timeframe, having formed from a (likely) collision during Earth’s infancy some 4 billion years ago.2

Regardless of which recession rate is correct, the conundrum of the moon’s rapid recession is still a lingering problem for uniformitarian scientists. It doesn’t fit the evolutionary assumption that the Earth is 4.55 billion years old. In contrast, the moon recession rate is not a problem for young earth creationists who hold to a 6,000-year age of the Earth and moon.

So, how long was the “year” in the past? Most Flood geologists believe Cretaceous rocks and fossils were deposited in the Flood year, possibly at the highest water level of the global Flood.4 And the length of the day was possibly slightly different prior to the Flood (about 4400 years ago) and/or possibly different at the onset of Creation. A lot of rapid plate tectonic activity may have changed the earth’s rotation rate slightly. But, the length of the year was likely not too different from today, maybe falling somewhere in the range of 360 to 370 days per year. And unsurprisingly, this is pretty much the same range found in the present study.2 If only secular scientists could solve that pesky moon recession problem.

Stage image: Picture of Torreites sanchezi, a rudist bivalve.
Stage image credit: AGU. Copyright © 2020. Adapted for use in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders.


References
1. de Winter, N.J., et al. 2020. Subdaily-scale chemical variability in a Torreites sanchezi rudist shell: Implications for rudist paleobiology and the Cretaceous day-night cycle. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology. 35, e2019PA003723.
2. Dvorsky, G. 2020. Days on Earth used to be 30 minutes shorter, ancient shell suggests. Gizmodo. Published on gizmodo.com March 9, 2020, accessed April 3, 2020.
3. Glock, W.S., et al. 1960. Classification and Multiplicity of Growth Patterns in the Branches of Trees. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections. 140 (1): 1–292.
4. Clarey, T. 2020. Carved in Stone. Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research, 282-311.

*Dr. Clarey is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his doctorate in geology from Western Michigan University.
The Latest
NEWS
Latest DNA Tech Still Light Years Behind
Let’s say you recorded a library of books onto DNA. Hundreds of books could fit on your fingertip, but how would you find the one book you wanted? As...

NEWS
Giant Rhinos Are Still Rhinos
Fossils from two giant rhinos dated by evolutionists to be “22 million years old” in the evolutionary timetable have been discovered in China.1...

NEWS
Diverse Devonian Plant Assemblage from Early Flood
Scientists recently discovered a diverse assemblage of fossils in South Africa claimed to be some of the earliest land plants.1 Known as seedless...

NEWS
ICR Hosts Christian Educators Conference
As creation scientists continue to demonstrate that biblical creation makes far better sense of scientific data than evolutionary theory does, there is...

NEWS
Inside July 2021 Acts & Facts
Were dragons real creatures? How balanced was our universe 6,000 years ago? Why is Acadia National Park significant for biblical creation? Can scientists...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Moon
Christy Hardy and Susan Windsor* You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with...

ACTS & FACTS
A Prayer for ICR
This month we invite you to join us in a prayer for the Institute for Creation Research’s ministry. Dear Jesus, Creator of all, we seek to...

APOLOGETICS
Grasshopper Apologetics: No Need to Get Jumpy
After spying in Canaan, 10 Hebrew scouts fearfully reported, “We saw the giants…and we were [by comparison] like grasshoppers”...

ACTS & FACTS
Can Scientists Replace God with Nothing?
Hebrews 11:3 says, “By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God.” Do you find it a little odd that we must have...

ACTS & FACTS
The Plate Twirler and Our Solar System
Imagine opening a door to a room and seeing a plate spinning on a stick with a spin rate that makes it wobble. Then imagine you shut the door and go...