Ice Age Footprints Step on Radiocarbon Results | The Institute for Creation Research

Ice Age Footprints Step on Radiocarbon Results

Radiocarbon dating seems like solid science. It appeals as a kind of time machine, providing a clear peephole to peer into the past. However, a new debate over ancient human footprints from New Mexico shows one way that this supposed peephole can get all fogged up.

A 2021 study had assigned an age of about 22,000 carbon years to sediments that hold mammoth, giant sloth, and human footprints found in the ancient Lake Otero Basin.1 Its authors concluded therefore that these prints placed humans in North America long before most scientists thought.

How did they land on this older-than-expected “age?” The team extracted and sent for radiocarbon analysis small seeds from the track-bearing sediments. The seeds came from the underwater plant Ruppia cirrhosa.

Radiocarbon labs do not measure time. Instead, they precisely measure carbon isotope ratios. Carbon comes in three isotopes, and the rarest of the three has an unstable nucleus. Carbon-14 (14C) atoms are like needles in carbon-12 haystacks. They emit radiation at a steady rate until they turn into nitrogen (14N).

Experts must therefore convert the isotope ratios into “ages” using a series of formulas. The tricky part comes where these formulas substitute assumed values for unknown variables. In the case of radiocarbon, for example, one must assume that the radiocarbon atoms in the seed came from a particular source—for example, the atmosphere—in the year the seed grew and was buried. We also need to assume a value for the carbon isotope ratio in the atmosphere at that time. We can’t know either variable without a real time machine.

Now, a 2022 report claims that those seeds were misdated. The seeds supposedly grabbed their radiocarbon atoms from very old water instead of from the ancient atmosphere.2 This newer study measured the carbon isotope ratio in seeds of the same plant, but these were harvested and archived in 1947. That would make these seeds (2022 minus 1947) 75 calendar years old. Their radiocarbon age? “7400 years old.”3

Well, that’s a few orders of magnitude off-kilter.

By applying this huge offset found in recent seeds to the ice age seeds, the 2022 study authors argued that the carbon ages assigned in 2021 were vastly inflated. This apparent recall swings the time of the first human pioneers of America back in line with long-held expectations.

Should scientists now breathe a sigh of relief from this realignment? Well, maybe in terms of the first Americans but not in terms of radiocarbon dating.

Where was this ancient lake getting such old water from? How was this ancient lake able to insulate its supposedly much older age (i.e., its dramatically low ratio of 14C content) from the atmosphere under which it rested? And crucially, if supposedly old radiocarbon sources tilted these age assignments this far from expectation, then how do we know they did not also nullify other radiocarbon “ages?”

After all, radiocarbon years can be systematically older than archaeological years.4

And this leads to one more string of questions. Is there enough latitude in radiocarbon results for researchers to, in a subtle way, “find” the ages they expect? Paleoecologist David Rhode coauthored the 2022 study. He told the Desert Research Institute regarding the 2021 age that his team helped refute, “It really does throw a lot of what we think we know into question. That’s why it’s important to really nail down this age, and why we’re suggesting that we need better evidence.”

If by “better,” he means an age that better aligns with what he and his colleagues have believed for so long, then he has it now.

Rhode also said about the tracks, “I’d love to see them myself. I’m just cautious about the ages that the [2021] researchers put to them.” And with an age discrepancy using the same technique at two orders of magnitude, perhaps we should be cautious about the ages that researchers put to just about anything.

1. Bennett, M.R., et al. 2021. Evidence of humans in North America during the last glacial maximum. Science. 373: 1528–1531.
2. Oviatt, C.G. et al. A critical assessment of claims that human footprints in the Lake Otero basin, New Mexico date to the Last Glacial Maximum. Quaternary Research. 1-10. Published online before print, September 2, 2022.
3. Footprints Claimed as Evidence of Ice Age Humans in North America Need Better Dating, New Research Shows. Desert Research Institute. Posted on November 15, 2022, accessed November 29, 2022. 
4. Kutschera, W., et al. 2012. The Chronology of Tell El-Daba: A Crucial Meeting Point of 14C Dating, Archaeology, and Egyptology in the 2nd Millennium BC. Radiocarbon. 54(3-4): 407-422.

*Dr. Brian Thomas is Research Scientist at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in paleobiochemistry from the University of Liverpool.
The Latest
Forged in Faith: The Hard Work of Making Disciples | Creation.Live...
Jesus commanded that we make disciples, but what does that mean in this modern world? Has the church gone soft?   Hosts Trey and...

Algal Microfossils Show No Evolution
Creation scientists maintain that if something is living, then it’s automatically complex. This applies to organisms ranging from a single bacterium...

Rapid Erosion Devastates Deep Time! | The Creation Podcast: Episode...
Erosion takes place slowly, over millions of years, right? That's what mainstream science tells us anyway. Or, does erosion happen far more...

Flood Solves Land and Marine Mixing Near the Andes
A recent article published by Hakai Magazine claims to reveal secrets of an ancient inland sea that existed east of the Andes Mountains,1...

T. rex Out of Nowhere
As one of the largest predators ever at 45 feet long, it’s no wonder school children are enthralled with Tyrannosaurus rex. But where did the...

February 2024 ICR Wallpaper
"Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another." (1 John 4:11 NKJV) ICR February 2024 wallpaper is now available...

Evolutionist and ICR Research Both Attempting to Explain Fossil...
Recent evolutionary research is attempting to provide an explanation for why some animals became smaller over time. Or equivalently, it is attempting...

Animal Features Did Not Evolve
There’s no doubt that animals in God’s creation have iconic features. The question is, did these features evolve or were they created that...

Taking a Closer Look at Uniquely Human Eyes | The Creation Podcast:...
While we might take them for granted, our eyes are incredibly complex organs. How do they work? Is it possible for eyes to have evolved over long...

The Conserved Complexity of Eye Cell Types
The late leading evolutionary biologist, Ernst Mayr, said the eye appeared at least 40 times “during the evolution of animal diversity.”1...