The Holy War | The Institute for Creation Research
The Holy War

Now Diabolus thought he was safe because he had captured Mansoul and garrisoned himself within the city…. He had spoiled the old law books and promoted his own vain lies. He had appointed new magistrates and set up new aldermen. He had built new strongholds and manned them with his own gang. He did all this to make himself secure in case the good Shaddai or his Son should try to invade the town.1

Much effort and vast amounts of capital have been spent attacking the symptoms of a deeply imbedded sickness in modern society. In every realm, whether political, educational, business, or religious, leadership has concentrated on methods and processes to "cure" sociological or functional ills.

Much of the argument among politicians is over the cure for the problems that plague us. But this argument is over how to treat the symptoms, not for the discovery of the cause of the disease. We have abrogated the issues of human relationships to meaningless debates over techniques, programs, and economic distribution. We have reduced the universal human search for meaning to nothing more than a "fulfilling self image." We have encoded the Darwinian "survival of the fittest" with the New Age jargon of empowerment to "be all you can be."

In biblical terms, the "disease" is sin, curable only by regeneration through the work of the Holy Spirit made possible by the love of God the Father expressed in the substitutional death, burial, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ.

In human terms, the "disease" is a naturalistic worldview, curable only by the embracing of a theistic worldview that acknowledges the Creator.

The clearest contrast of the worldviews can be seen in the language and perspectives commonly used to shape social mores. The radical shift in morals and ethics seen in most countries may best be understood when contrasting today's naturalistic framework with the biblical perspective.

Prior to the 16th century, the two competing worldviews were supernatural belief systems. The biblical worldview is theistic and creationist, while the Babylonian and the subsequent Persian, Asian, Greek, and Roman cosmologies are either pantheistic or polytheistic, but completely evolutionary. The early evolutionary religions either worshiped the various personifications of natural forces (polytheism) or the abstract worship of nature (pantheism).

Today, the three monotheistic religions of the world (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) are (or were) creationist at their core. All other religions, derived in some measure from the Babylonian worship of the forces of nature, are or were evolutionary. These two worldviews (belief systems) now stand at the center of reflective and deductive thought.

The naturalist believes that there is no supernatural force in existence and that man has reached the stage where he is able to direct the evolutionary development of the universe.

The creationist believes that the Creator God exists and that the creatures of that God must seek to understand the Creator's will.

The common data that both share will be interpreted in the light of the belief system (worldview, faith) that the individual holds. When we ask the questions that plague our minds--Why is the world full of evil? Why can't we all get along? Why can't we seem to get "enough"?--the answers come from our worldview.

The battle now being waged among the power centers of the world is essentially a strategic warfare guided by two entirely different belief systems. One seeks to control the affairs of men based on a naturalistic and humanistic worldview, and the other seeks to present a theistic and creationist worldview.

The war between these worldviews constitutes the basis for the opposing philosophies, religions, political, and sociological tenets and actions taken by man.

What we believe will frame our reactions, our priorities, and our expectations.


  1. Bunyan, J. 2001. The Holy War. New Kensington, PA: Whitaker House, 31.

* Dr. Morris is Chief Executive Officer of the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: Morris III, H. 2010. The Holy War. Acts & Facts. 39 (7): 22.

The Latest
The Role and Realm of Science
In society today, “science” often takes center stage as a significant influencer on policy decisions and public opinion. Climate change, pandemic...

FOX News Discusses Creation, Evolution, and Adam
FOX News recently ran internet and television coverage discussing the creation/evolution controversy. Specifically, they discussed Adam’s place in...

Is Creation Science Really That Important? | The Creation Podcast:...
What is creation science, and why is it important? Why did an evolutionary scientist become a creationist? And how can you defend Christianity using...

Evidence Supports Post-Flood Wet Climate for Egypt
Evolutionary scientists found evidence that the Sahara Desert was green and fertile at the end of the Ice Age, allowing people to live hundreds of miles...

ICR Announces New Logo
After 52 years of fruitful ministry, the Institute for Creation Research is renewing its commitment to rigorous scientific research that affirms the...

Inside January-February 2022 Acts & Facts
How can we use the Bible to guide scientific research? Why is counting ice core layers an insufficient way to determine Earth’s age? How does...

Pterosaur Contours Look Engineered
Flying reptiles once flew through ancient skies. Most of our knowledge of these fascinating animals, called pterosaurs, comes from their fossils. But how...

Creation Kids: Our Young Solar System
by Christy Hardy and Susan Windsor* You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation...

Donors Make It Happen
In 1 Samuel 30, there’s an interesting story that’s easy to overlook if you fly by too fast. David and his men are returning from Jezreel...

Puffins, Fitted for Living in Sea, Air, and Land
In order for tufted, horned, and Atlantic puffins to “be fruitful, multiply, and fill” specific habitats on Earth,1 they need...