Fossilized Bird Lung Inflates Confidence in Creation | The Institute for Creation Research

Fossilized Bird Lung Inflates Confidence in Creation

A pristine Mesozoic bird fossil showed impressions of feathers and even some organs, including what appear to be lungs. The technical article published in the leading journal PNAS did not report any original body tissue, nor any substance that literally felt soft.1 Instead, the now-decomposed lungs left such detailed impressions that researchers saw lung microstructures. Two aspects of this set of probable lungs confirm biblical creation.
 
First, researchers found that the lungs look exactly like those of modern birds. Air flows through bird lungs in one direction instead of in and out as in mammal lungs. How could one lung design have evolved into a completely different arrangement without leaving the imagined transitional animal(s) breathless?

This recent news that fossil bird lungs look already fully bird-like exactly fits the Genesis-based idea that God created birds. Tweet: This recent #news that #fossil bird lungs look already fully bird-like exactly fits the Genesis-based idea that God created birds.

Fossilized Bird Lung Inflates Confidence in Creation: https://www.icr.org/article/fossilized-bird-lung-inflates-confidence/

@ICRscience @icrbthomas

This question has taken the wind out of evolutionary sails. For example, evolutionist Michael Denton’s classic book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis described bird lungs as too lofty a challenge for evolution to fly over. This recent news that fossil bird lungs look already fully bird-like exactly fits the Genesis-based idea that God created birds. Once again the fossils show no evolution.
 
The fossil had other similarities with modern birds. LiveScience wrote that “it appears that the fossilized lung was embedded in the bird’s ribs, just as bird lungs are today.”2 Science News wrote that “the bird had a pointed tail known as a pintail, something previously unknown in birds that lived during the Mesozoic…but found in modern birds such as the pintail duck.”3
 
Another aspect that points to creation has to do with China’s early Cretaceous Jehol rocks from which researchers collected the fossil. Its location in the strata makes it the oldest known fossilized bird lung. The PNAS study authors wrote, “This suggests that the general structural design of the avian lung has been conserved for a very long time, being already present in the most primitive members of the Ornithuromorpha, the clade that includes Neornithes [modern birds], and can be presumed to have considerable functional utility.”1

Once again the fossils show no evolution. Tweet: Once again the fossils show no evolution.

Fossilized Bird Lung Inflates Confidence in Creation: https://www.icr.org/article/fossilized-bird-lung-inflates-confidence/

@ICRscience @icrbthomas

#Science #Research

The countercurrent exchange microstructures make bird lungs the most efficient “functional” lungs around. Now why would this structural design already exist in the most primitive (actually, the lowest strata) bird lungs? This news that even the earliest bird lungs were fully formed fits the Genesis-based idea that God created birds with their efficient lungs right from the start.
 
References
1. Wang, X. et al. Archaeorhynchus preserving significant soft tissue including probable fossilized lungs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online before print October 22, 2018, accessed November 7, 2018.
2. Geggel, L. Exquisitely Preserved Lungs from 120 Million Years Ago Stun Scientists Studying Early Bird. LiveScience. Posted on livescience.com October 19, 2018, accessed November 6, 2018.
3. Gramling, C. In a first, scientists spot what may be lungs in an ancient bird fossil. Science News. Posted on Sciencenews.org October 19, 2018, accessed November 6, 2018.

Stage image credit: Copyright © 2018. PNAS. Used in accordance with federal copyright (fair use doctrine) law. Usage by ICR does not imply endorsement of copyright holders.

*Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.
Article posted on November 29, 2018.

The Latest
NEWS
Reflecting on Five Years of the ICR Discovery Center
Since its grand opening on September 2, 2019, the ICR Discovery Center has encouraged thousands of visitors from all over the world with science that...

NEWS
The Magnificence of a Colorful Autumn: Beauty and Complexity...
Scientists have long endeavored to comprehend the transformations that take place in trees and plants throughout the autumn season. While lacking complete...

NEWS
September 2024 ICR Wallpaper
"God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands. Nor is He worshiped...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Geysers
by Renée Dusseau and Susan Windsor* You're never too young to be a creation scientist and explore our Creator's world. Kids, discover...

ACTS & FACTS
Sharing Our Creator's Truth
My name is Bill, and I’m the information technology manager at the Institute for Creation Research. I keep everything technical running and make...

ACTS & FACTS
Engineered Parallel Gene Codes Defy Evolution
Researchers over the past decade have been characterizing new, previously hidden genetic codes embedded within the same sections of genes that code...

ACTS & FACTS
La Brea Tar Pits at Hancock Park: Post-Flood Catastrophes
The La Brea Tar Pits have fascinated visitors ever since Spanish explorer Gaspar de Portolá chronicled the site in 1769.1 But even...

ACTS & FACTS
Proclaiming Christ in Paradise: An Interview with Dr. Brian Thomas
For more than 50 years, the Institute for Creation Research has investigated the evidence showing how science supports the Bible’s account of...

ACTS & FACTS
Why Biology Needs A Theory of Biological Design—Part 4
Nobel Prize-winning German physicist Max Planck perceptively observed that “if you change the way you look at things, the things you look...

NEWS
Long Ages and the Bible—What’s the Problem?
The problem with mixing long ages and the Bible stems from how someone interprets Genesis 1 and 2. If these chapters are read as symbolic and/or poetic...