Flood Solves Land and Marine Mixing Near the Andes | The Institute for Creation Research


Flood Solves Land and Marine Mixing Near the Andes

A recent article published by Hakai Magazine claims to reveal secrets of an ancient inland sea that existed east of the Andes Mountains,1 but it really just offers poor explanations for an already murky evolutionary tale and leaves the reader wondering.

Santiago Flórez describes a multitude of fossils found in the Paja Formation near the town of Villa de Leyva, Colombia.1 Paleontologists have unearthed 10-meter-long (33 ft) marine reptiles called pliosaurs, equally long plesiosaurs, and countless ammonites in the same Lower Cretaceous unit, which evolutionists claim was deposited about 130 million years ago.2

Flórez also describes wonderfully preserved plant fossils from within the same unit as the marine fossils.1 The numerous land plants paleontologists have excavated from the formation include leaves, stems, branches, and fossilized wood from pine, conifer, and cypress trees.

The Paja Formation is a sequence of sandstones, black shales, and limestone. Evolutionary scientists think this area was a vast inland sea, part of the fledgling Caribbean Sea, with water depths of about 180–200 meters (600–650 ft).1 They claim the water was toxic at the bottom and had low levels of dissolved oxygen in order to preserve the millions of fossils and organic debris.1

But is this realistic? Why was the water toxic at the bottom and low in oxygen if this was a vast, shallow, open sea? And how did these dead animals get buried fast enough to become fossils if they just settled to the bottom? Finally, how did the land plants get mixed in with the marine fossils?

First, let’s consider their claim about toxic water conditions. This stems from their training in uniformitarianism. Geology students are taught that “black shales” must mean anoxic (low oxygen) conditions existed in order to preserve the amount of organic material needed to turn the rock black. The same anoxic conditions are invoked to explain many black shales around the world.3

Of course, this is merely a recitation of what they have been taught. They don’t take the time to think it through. Uniformitarian scientists “know” black shales mean anoxic conditions, so anoxic conditions must have existed.

They expect people to believe that no storms could have stirred up and mixed the water column across such a vast, shallow sea and that no downwelling of oxygen-rich water was occurring to transport oxygen to great depths, as occurs in the oceans today. Their explanation seems highly doubtful, to say the least.

How about the land plants? How do evolutionary scientists explain their presence in the same layers as marine fossils?

Flórez wrote:

The ancient epicontinental sea [shallow inland sea] bordered a forested coastline full of conifers, pines, and cypresses. Some remains of these floratrees, leaves, and branches carried by a river to the ocean or plant fragments that may have been blown there by the windended up sinking to the bottom of the ocean, where conditions were ideal for preservation. Finding fossils of ancient terrestrial plants next to marine creatures is not uncommon in the Paja Formation.

Here he invokes winds strong enough to blow plant fragments out to sea, yet the winds couldn’t stir up the toxic waters? This doesn’t make sense. Additionally, winds help drive currents. Currents would have helped mix the water column, too.

Additionally, rock layers that contain a mix of land and marine fossils are common globally. In fact, rock units with both terrestrial and marine fossils are found on nearly every continent, and this is just what you’d expect from the global Flood.4–7

This is why creationists have a better explanation for the Paja Formation. There was no ancient, shallow, toxic inland sea. The formation was simply another sedimentary unit deposited on the continents as water rose and neared its highest water level during the Flood year. This washed marine animals onto the formerly dry land and buried them whole, and likely alive, in mud and sandy sediment. The Flood’s tsunami waves also stripped countless plants from land to become fossils in the same unit. This deposit and the fossils it contains are best explained by the progressive global Flood.

There is no Paja Formation mystery. Evidence for the Genesis global Flood can be found all over the world. God’s Word has already provided the best explanation.

References

  1. Flórez, S. 2024. The secrets of the sea hidden high in the Andes. Hakai Magazine. Published on hakaimagazine.com January 23, 2024, accessed January 28, 2024.
  2. Of course, we disagree with these ages and interpret this layer to have been deposited about 4,500 years ago during the advance of the Zuni Megasequence, when the floodwaters were nearing their peak. Clarey, T. 2020. Carved in Stone: Geological Evidence of the Worldwide Flood. Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation Research.
  3. Ibid, 250–252.
  4. Clarey, T. 2016. Fresh Water and Salt Water Don't Mix. Acts & Facts. 45 (11): 9.
  5. Clarey, T. 2015. Dinosaurs in Marine Sediments: A Worldwide Phenomenon. Acts & Facts. 44 (6): 16.
  6. Gess, R. W. and C. Prestianni. 2021. An early Devonian flora from the Baviaanskloof Formation (Table Mountain Group) of South Africa. Scientific Reports. 11 (1).
  7. Luque, J., et al. 2021. Crab in amber reveals an early colonization of nonmarine environments during the Cretaceous. Science Advances. 7 (43): eabj5689.

* Dr. Clarey is Director of Research at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his doctorate in geology from Western Michigan University.

The Latest
NEWS
Octopus and Fish Plan a Complex Coordinated Hunt
The octopus—an invertebrate—never fails to surprise researchers with its incredible abilities.1,2 The octopus was designed...

NEWS
A ''40 million year old'' 100% European Gnat
Finding well-preserved creatures in amber1 is a landfall for creation scientists, much like the numerous discoveries of soft dinosaur tissue...

CREATION PODCAST
The Undeniable Power of Narrative | The Creation Podcast: Episode...
Science is objective. At least, that’s what we’re told. But there are inherent issues with this statement that can cause...

NEWS
Paintbrush of the Creator
Who doesn’t enjoy the amazing color patterns of butterflies?1,2 Such beautiful designs and construction do not reflect blind naturalistic...

NEWS
November 2024 ICR Wallpaper
"Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, in everything give thanks; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you." (1 Thessalonians 5:16-18 NKJV) ICR...

NEWS
Reformation Day, October 31
Five hundred years ago in Wittenberg, Germany, an unusual scholar changed the course of human history using pen and hammer. Dr. Martin Luther protested...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Owls
by Sydney Walters and Susan Windsor* You're never too young to be a creation scientist and explore our Creator's world. Kids, discover...

ACTS & FACTS
RNA Hoops: When Circular Reasoning Makes Sense
If the regulatory picture of the genome were not complicated enough, over the past decade scientists have discovered another level of Darwinian-defying...

ACTS & FACTS
Gunnison National Forest: Adaptable Aspens and Warped Rocks
Gunnison National Forest’s 1.67-millionplus acres showcase stunning views of the Colorado Rocky Mountains. The Continental Divide forms its eastern...

ACTS & FACTS
Applying the Theory of Biological Design to Optimal Owl Flight
by Randy J. Guliuzza, P.E., M.D., and Aaron T. Guliuzza, P.E.*   If the greatest writers had been well-versed in fields of science,...