In late June, Forbes magazine published an article by environmentalist and climate activist Michael Shellenberger in which he apologized for thirty years of climate alarmism promoted by the environmental movement.
Shellenberger thinks climate change is happening, but he does not think it is the catastrophe that it is often made out to be. In fact, he doesn’t even think it is the most serious of environmental problems. The original article is apparently no longer available on the Forbes.com website, but an archived PDF of his article may be read elsewhere.1 The article is a brief summary of an argument he makes in greater detail in his new book Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All.2
Shellenberger notes that, despite his denunciation of climate alarmism, he is not a “right-wing anti-environmentalist.”1 He has a long record of environmental activism, starting at the age of 16 when he fundraised for the Rainforest Action Network. He helped save the last unprotected redwood trees in California and has been a strong past supporter of renewable energy sources.1 He is a recipient of Time magazine’s “Hero of the Environment” award.3 He has provided expert testimony to the United States Congress and has been asked to serve as an expert reviewer for the next Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.1
Shellenberger claims that much of the “conventional wisdom” regarding climate change is simply wrong. He also says that in the past he refrained from speaking out against climate alarmism for two reasons. First, he was embarrassed, as he himself had made some of those same alarmist claims. Second, he was afraid to do so, for fear of “losing friends and funding.” In fact, he says that on the few previous occasions on which he did speak out against misrepresentation, he suffered for it.1
This should serve as a wake-up call for those who have naively idolized scientists as objective seekers of truth motivated by nothing more than a love for truth and logic. As long-time followers of the creation-evolution controversy well know, scientists—being human—are often motivated by other factors. One simply cannot naively assume that scientists are always objective! In fact, professionals in other areas are often afraid to contradict the “consensus” view, as demonstrated by the recent dramatic resignation letter of New York Times columnist and editor Bari Weiss.4,5
Indeed, evolutionary and old-Earth beliefs, particularly acceptance of the secular Milankovitch (or astronomical) ice age theory, is a major contributor to climate alarmism,6 despite the fact that original ICR research has revealed that evidence for the theory is incredibly shaky, even if one accepts the typical old-Earth age assignments.7
This should be a reminder that only God and His Word should be trusted without reservation. Because we humans are sinful and fallible, we should “test” what others (including scientists) say—including what they say about the subject of origins.
1. Shellenberger, M. On Behalf of Environmentalists, I Apologize for the Climate Scare. Forbes. Posted on forbes.com June 28, 2020, accessed at wattsupwiththat.com July 15, 2020.
2. Shellenberger, M. 2020. Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
3. Shellenberger, M. Contributor Description. Forbes. Posted on forbes.com, accessed July 15, 2020.
4. Weiss, B. Resignation Letter. Bari Weiss website. Posted on bariweiss.com, accessed July 15, 2020.
5. Flood, B. Bari Weiss quits New York Times after bullying by colleagues over views: ‘They have called me a Nazi and a racist.’ Fox News. Posted on foxnews.com July 14, 2020, accessed July 15, 2020.
6. Hebert, J. 2019. Climate Alarmism and the Age of the Earth. Acts & Facts 48(4).
7. Hebert, J. Physics Today Article Ignores Monster Milankovitch Problem. Creation Science Update. Posted on ICR.org May 24, 2020, accessed July 15, 2020.
*Dr. Jake Hebert is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Texas at Dallas.
Environmentalist Apologizes for Climate Change Alarmism
Sharks are back in the news, and it’s in regard to their most formidable and fearsome structure—their jaws. Zoologists recently studied...
Established Day 4 | Creation.Live Podcast: Episode 13
Humans have long been fascinated by the night sky. As Psalm 19:1 reminds us, "The heavens declare the glory of God"—His creative signature...
Physical Evidence Trumps Evolution Theory
One of the hallmarks of good science is to formulate a cogent theory based on the physical evidence. For example, if the physical evidence (e.g. a fossilized...
Solar System Symmetries
Most all school children can recite the planets in our solar system using memory devices such as: “My Very Easy Method Just Speeds Up Names”...
Does Iron Toast Union Rescue Long Ages?
The puzzle persists after all these years. On the one hand, biochemists perform decay rate studies that show biochemicals cannot last a million years...
The Industrious Efficiency of Bees | The Creation Podcast: Episode...
Bees? BEES! When it comes to these incredible insects, we often think of hives and honey—and stingers. But these little creatures are incredibly...
Blinking Fish Transitioned to Land?
The mudskipper (Boleophthalmus caeruleomaculatus) of the order Perciformes, is a fascinating fish whose evolutionary origins are quite unknown. They...
Man: Created to Walk Upright
One of the many serious problems with “human evolution” is how, when, why, and where our alleged apelike ancestors decided to rise and walk...
''Prehistoric'' Reptile Designed to Swim
Locomotion in the human and animal world means the power to move from one place to another. Recently, evolutionists have published research regarding...
Human Neurons with 'Tricks Up Their Sleeves'
Who isn’t curious, at some level at least, about how human brains process all the complicated inputs and outputs that our daily lives require?...