Disposal of Homo naledi in a possible deathtrap or mass mortality scenario | The Institute for Creation Research
Disposal of Homo naledi in a possible deathtrap or mass mortality scenario

In Journal of Creation 31(2): 61-70

Homo naledi is the most recent claim of a human ancestor. Since its announcement, the question of what the bones truly represent has been under constant scrutiny. The discovering scientists have also proposed that bones were deliberately placed there over an extended period of time by living Homo naledi in some sort of burial ritual. However, they did recognize that mass mortality due to a deathtrap is possible.

This paper reviews the detailed geological reports of the cave site. A new disposal interpretation is proposed after recognizing that most of the bone-bearing sedimentary units described in the geological reports could have been deposited simultaneously. The emplacement of H. naledi bones can then be explained by a flooding of the cave system, or even a few, closely spaced flood events, which transported suspended sediment and floating remains downward into the Dinaledi and Lesedi Chambers, creating bone beds in each location.

The discovery of an additional 131 bone specimens of Homo naledi in a nearby cave within the same cave system seems to reduce the likelihood of deliberate body caching in the Dinaledi Chamber. Instead, the two separate sites suggest H. naledi remains were likely transported in by similar processes to both chambers in a deathtrap or mass mortality scenario.

In this interpretation, no body caching over an extended period of time is necessary. The emplacement of H. naledi remains may simply represent nothing more than an Ice Age flooding episode of the cave system, revealing very little about past behaviour. Any attempt to humanize these bones by claiming Homo naledi had behaviour like humans is unfounded and premature.

Click here to read the full article text.

The Latest
Can Scripture Be Trusted? | Creation.Live Podcast: Episode 8
Both believers and skeptics can find themselves asking if Scripture can be taken at its word. Is it scientifically accurate? Can its history be trusted?...

Cambrian Soft Tissue Defies Evolution
Paleontologists have discovered “early fossils [of] simple hollow tubes ranging from a few millimetres to many centimetres in length.”1...

Fruit Fly Jitters
Researchers working with fruit flies–the ubiquitous lab animal–have discovered the flies are able to undergo an amazing ocular process called...

Can Radioisotope Dating Be Trusted? | The Creation Podcast: Episode...
Carbon dating is a common method used to determine the ages of fossils and other materials, but carbon14 deteriorates quite quickly. How can it still...

Prepare for the Big Non-Event!
In 1950 the famed Italian physicist Enrico Fermi asked his coworkers at the lunch table the simple metaphysical question in regard to possible aliens...

Move Toward the Enemy: Fighting for Truth in Science
Honor to the soldier and sailor everywhere, who bravely bears his country’s cause. Honor, also, to the citizen who cares for his brother in the...

Evolving Mammals?
The evolution of mammals from non-mammals, like the evolution of all other animal groups, has been, and will always be, problematic. English paleontologist...

Butterfly Variation
Butterflies have made science news again, this time in regard to a master gene called WntA: “a combined team of researchers from Cornell University...

How Old Is The Universe? | The Creation Podcast: Episode 35
Many scientists claim that the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years old by reverse-engineering the Big Bang with the assumption that this theory...

Massive Tsunamis Generated by the Flood, Not an Asteroid
Two separate studies claim massive tsunamis and earthquakes from an asteroid impact profoundly affected the rock record. One research team modeled a...