Can and Will Be Used Against You | The Institute for Creation Research
Can and Will Be Used Against You

Is it fair to refute evolutionists’ claims with their own words?1,2

“For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”3

Yes, it’s fair to counter and judge someone’s argument by their own words. As Christ’s admonition quoted above shows, people invite condemnation by their own words. This applies to controversies involving evidentiary apologetics.

Yes, it’s fair to counter and judge someone’s argument by their own words. Tweet: Yes, it’s fair to counter and judge someone’s argument by their own words.

Can and Will Be Used Against You: https://www.icr.org/article/can-and-will-be-used-against-you/

@ICRscience

#Science #Apologetics

Like other creation scientists, ICR founder Dr. Henry Morris routinely quoted evolutionists’ statements to 1) contradict evolutionary teachings and/or 2) provide evidence supporting creation science, corroborating what Genesis teaches about God’s creation.4

However, some evolutionists criticize creationists for using evolutionist quotations to impeach Darwinian teachings. Such critics claim that “hijacking” (i.e., harnessing) such quotations unfairly distorts the initial intention of the quoted evolutionist. But that’s like saying that a message’s content can never be used to refute its own author. Authors are not immune from accountability. Rather, by teaching others, they incur extra accountability.5

Holding speakers and writers accountable for their own words in the context of a courtroom is illustrated by the “statement against interest” rule—an evidentiary exemption to the general rule prohibiting hearsay testimony. This time-honored forensic evidence rule is routinely applied by trial judges so that witnesses can be self-impeached by some of their own words.6,7

Specifically, Federal Evidence Rule 804(b)(3)(A) governs the admissibility of verbal evidence in litigation and administrative law contexts, defining a statement against interest as a hearsay-exception if the quoted statement is one that

…a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made, it was so contrary to the declarant’s proprietary or pecuniary interest or had so great a tendency to invalidate the declarant’s claim against someone else or to expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability.6

In other words, what a declarant says is credible, and is rebuttably presumed reliable, if a reasonable person would not admit it unless it were true. Thus, whenever an evolutionist admits something like Darwinism’s “missing links” are still missing, that admission is a reliable statement against interest.1,6

Evolutionary geneticists often use information communication terminology such as code, transcription, decipher, translation, program, instruction, messenger RNA, edit, alphabet, etc., to describe the bio-informational workings of human genes. Their very words betray that they are clearly observing a form of programming much more sophisticated than anything IBM ever invented.8,9

In fact, even the word “selection,” as in “natural selection,” is an evolutionist’s telltale admission against interest, because only intelligent beings can “select” whether and how to adjust to the changing conditions of the outside world.2,8,9

Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.10

Perhaps Darwinists need a warning from Dragnet’s Sergeant Joe Friday before they publish their evolutionary imaginations, because phrases like “natural selection” and “hopeful monsters” can and will be used against them by creationists debunking their “science falsely so called.”11

References

  1. Clarey, T. 2017. Local Catastrophes or Receding Floodwater? Global Geologic Data That Refute a K-Pg (K-T) Flood/Post-Flood Boundary. Creation Research Society Quarterly. 54 (2): 100-120. On pages 113-114 and 117-118, Dr. Clarey debunks unwise “saltationist” advocacy of “hyper-evolution,” including Harvard-credentialed Darwinist advocacy of terrestrial quadrupeds morphing into cetaceans.
  2. Guliuzza, R. 2011. Darwin’s Sacred Imposter: Natural Selection’s Idolatrous Trap. Acts & Facts. 40 (11): 12-15. On page 12, Dr. Guliuzza debunks animistic “natural selection” claims of so-called beneficial mutations in bacteria.
  3. Matthew 12:37.
  4. Morris, H. M. 1997. That Their Words May Be Used Against Them. Green Forest, AR: Master Books.
  5. James 3:1 refers to teachers (didaskaloi).
  6. Federal Evidence Rule 804(b)(3)(A). Similar rules, cloned from the Federal Rules of Evidence, are applied in state courts and administrative law tribunals.
  7. Besides “statements against interest,” behaviors can also be used to impeach what declarants say. See DeVoe, G. A. and J. S. Valliere. 2018. On Camera: The Texas Supreme Court Solidifies Strategic Use of Surveillance. Texas Bar Journal. 81 (8): 606-607, citing Diamond Offshore Services v. Williams, 542 S.W.3d 539 (Tex. 2018).
  8. Johnson, J. J. S. 2011. DNA and RNA: Providential Coding to “Revere” God. Acts & Facts. 40 (3): 8-9.
  9. Guliuzza, R. IBM’s Watson: Designed to Learn Like a Human. Creation Science Update. Posted on ICR.org March 19, 2014, accessed September 20, 2018.
  10. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 489-489, 471, 479 (1966) (majority opinion).
  11. 1 Timothy 6:20-21, KJV.

* Dr. Johnson is Associate Professor of Apologetics and Chief Academic Officer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: James J. S. Johnson, J.D., Th.D. 2018. Can and Will Be Used Against You. Acts & Facts. 47 (12).

The Latest
NEWS
Are Creationists Conspiracy Theorists?
Paul Braterman, emeritus professor of chemistry at the University of Glasgow, recently claimed online that creationism “meets all the criteria”...

NEWS
How Algae Do Fine When Tossed at Sea
How would you do if someone spun you around every few seconds all day long? Marine algae repeatedly get tossed about in coastal surf, and they cope quite...

NEWS
Butterfly Wing Design Repudiates Evolution
The takeoff and flight of butterflies has long been derided by evolutionists as being an unstable and inefficient product of evolution. However, a new...

NEWS
Reconciling Two Different Calculations of the Hubble Constant
An interesting article1 on physics.org caught my attention. Its title is “Solved: The Mystery of the Expansion of the Universe.”...

ANNOUNCEMENTS
Institute for Creation Research Awarded Highest Rating from Charity...
DALLAS, February 11, 2021–The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) recently earned a 4-star rating from Charity Navigator—America’s...

NEWS
Reminder: Saturn’s Moon Titan Really Looks Young
Scientists led by Valerio Poggiali of Cornell University’s Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science have used Cassini spacecraft data to learn...

NEWS
Is Newfound Dinosaur Fossil the Biggest Ever?
Whether dealing with athletes, sports teams, skyscrapers, or animals, we always want to know who or what takes the top spot. Researchers just published...

NEWS
Inside February 2021 Acts & Facts
What is the mission of the Institute for Creation Research? What legacy did Dr. Henry M. Morris III leave behind? How will our Ice Age model impact...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Jupiter
You’re never too young to be a creation scientist! Kids, discover fun facts about God’s creation with ICR’s special Creation Kids learning...

ACTS & FACTS
Planting, Watering, and God's Increase
During construction of the ICR Discovery Center for Science & Earth History, I spent a lot of time working with various crews of artists and craftsmen....