Physics, Not God, Explains the Universe? | The Institute for Creation Research

Physics, Not God, Explains the Universe?

"With the laws of physics, you can get universes," said Alex Filippenko of the University of California, Berkeley, during a panel discussion at the June 23 SETICon 2 science and science fiction conference in Santa Clara, California.1 He argued that the universe could have begun as a result of a random "quantum mechanical fluctuation."1

Filippenko implies that we should not trust in God. "Instead, scientists say, we should trust the laws of physics."1 But many scientists suggest that the laws of physics lead to trust in God, not from it. Which is right?

Physicist Jake Hebert recently showed fatal flaws in this increasingly common "universe from nothing" argument, as described by theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss in his 2012 book, A Universe from Nothing. In Hebert's Acts & Facts article, he first explained that the "argument hinges on the claim that the total energy of the universe is exactly zero," an extraordinarily unlikely sum.2 And since nobody but God knows the exact energy content of the entire universe, the claim is entirely unscientific.

Second, and more critically, quantum fluctuations are only known to occur within space that already exists. How would the first universe-generating fluctuation occur without space, and how could that space be there without a universe already in place? It appears that in order to make a universe this way, another universe must already exist. In that case, how did the first universe begin—or the one before that?

Hebert also noted logical problems. For example, the assertion that the universe came from nothing assumes pre-existence of the very laws of physics that can supposedly generate universes. Filippenko began to address this by saying, "The question, then, is, 'Why are there laws of physics?' And you could say, 'Well, that required a divine creator, who created these laws of physics and the spark that led from the laws of physics to these universes, maybe more than one.'"1

But instead of accepting his own argument for a "divine creator," Filippenko objected that one would still need to explain where that creator came from, and where the creator of that creator came from, and so on. This is a thin smokescreen, since the ultimate Creator of the laws of physics and/or the finite universe would of necessity not be finite. Only finite entities like universes or people require causes, because only they have beginnings. A "beginningless" or infinite Creator did not come from anything else since He always was and is.3

Filippenko and like-minded scientists ignore the necessity of pre-existing space for quantum fluctuations to occur, ignore logical problems in obtaining laws of physics from nothing, and ignore the nature of God, all in the name of justifying their faith that the universe could come from nothing. In reality, without an infinite Creator, not only would there be no laws of physics that point sinful people to his existence, but there would be no universe at all.4

References

  1. Wall, M. The Big Bang Didn't Need God to Start Universe, Researchers Say. Space.com. Posted June 24, 2012, accessed June 29, 2012.
  2. Hebert, J. 2012. A Universe from Nothing? Acts & Facts. 41 (7): 11-13.
  3. Such a Creator would be identified as Jesus in Colossians 1; see esp. verses 15-17.
  4. Thomas, B. New Book Says Universe Came from Nothing. ICR News. Posted on icr.org January 20, 2012, accessed July 2, 2012.

Image credit: NASA

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on July 11, 2012.

The Latest
NEWS
Recent Discovery of a Strange Microbe Gives No Clues to Evolution
Research into God’s living creation is dynamic and always surprising. This is true whether one peers into the deepest reaches of space or dives...

NEWS
Built to Adapt: What Microbial Flexibility Reveals about Biological...
Imagine a machine that keeps working even when its parts change slightly or its surroundings shift. Most human-made machines would fail under that kind...

CREATION PODCAST
Scientists Ignored This DNA Pattern for DECADES! | The Creation...
Almost every living organism has tiny stretches of DNA that repeat over and over again. Scientists call these tandem repeats, and for a long time they...

NEWS
#1 Origins News Story of 2025: ICR Dr. Jeff Tomkins' Chimp Genome...
Research by ICR geneticist Dr. Jeff Tomkins was at the center of origins news in what has been called the “No. 1 Story for 2025.”1...

NEWS
Pterosaur Herbivory
The fascinating flying reptiles called pterosaurs are in the news again.1 In a not-so-surprising development, paleontologists have discovered...

NEWS
January 2026 ICR Wallpaper
"But those who wait on the LORD Shall renew their strength; They shall mount up with wings like eagles, They shall...

NEWS
Infrared Radiation and Pollination Reflects Recent Creation
by Jeffrey P. Tomkins, Ph.D., and Frank Sherwin, D.Sc. (Hon.)* The fascinating pollination of plants has been complex from the beginning of creation....

NEWS
Did Scientists Find "6 Million-Year-Old Ice" in Antarctica?
by Jake Hebert, Ph.D., and Frank Sherwin, D.Sc. (Hon.)* A small portion of surface ice in Antarctica is called blue-ice areas (BIAs), and for good...

ACTS & FACTS
Dinosaur Ridge: Last Stand of the Dinosaurs
Paleontologists have ranked Dinosaur Ridge as the top dinosaur track site in North America.1 Run by the nonprofit group Friends of Dinosaur...

ACTS & FACTS
An Incredible Year of Advancement! 2025 Year in Review
Dr. Guliuzza at chapel in Corban University, Salem, Oregon The Institute for Creation Research had another incredible year advancing creation...