Geoengineering and the Post-Flood Ice Age


Data Lead to Correct Post-Flood Boundary

For decades, creation scientists have debated the level at which the Flood ended in the rock record. In the past, many have based their conclusions on a cursory examination of the rocks, or concentrated only on the strata across the American West.
 


More Problems with Iconic Milankovitch Paper

Secular scientists have a difficult time explaining an Ice Age, even though there is strong geological evidence that one occurred. In fact, creation scientists have long argued that the Genesis Flood is a vastly superior mechanism for explaining an Ice Age.1


Sixtymile Formation Part of Genesis Flood

For many decades, creation scientists have included the Sixtymile Formation in Grand Canyon as part of the Sauk Megasequence that marks the onset of the global Flood.1 They based their conclusions on empirical data contained within the rock unit itself. And now, the secular geological community has arrived at a similar conclusion.2
 


Creation Geology [Podcast]

Can we believe both the Bible and geology? ICR geologist and Research Associate Dr. Tim Clarey uncovers how both fit together in this 5-part podcast series on creation geology. Dr. Clarey shares a unique geological perspective on the worldwide Flood, the origin and demise of dinosaurs, and the ice age.

Pages

Subscribe to Catastrophic Plate Tectonics