Atheists' Christmas Campaign: 'Yes' to Goodness, 'No' to God | The Institute for Creation Research

Atheists' Christmas Campaign: 'Yes' to Goodness, 'No' to God

Just weeks after the British Humanist Association unveiled plans for “No God” ads on London bendy-buses,1 the American Humanist Association (AHA) is starting a similar campaign to run during the holiday season.

The ads borrow a line from a popular Christmas jingle and proclaim, “Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness’ sake.” Costing an estimated 40,000 dollars, the ads are slated to appear on Washington, D.C., buses between mid-November and December 2008.

AHA spokesman Fred Edwords told the Associated Press, “Our reason for doing it during the holidays is there are an awful lot of agnostics, atheists and other types of nontheists who feel a little alone during the holidays because of its association with traditional religion.”2

But he failed to recognize that atheists, agnostics, and other types of nontheists need not be bothered about what Christians or other religious adherents celebrate at any time of the year. Since they don’t observe any “holy” days at all (that is, if they are true to their creed), any loneliness experienced is by their choice.

Edwords said the ads, unlike the British ones, were not aimed to argue against the existence of God, but were instead intended to “try to plant a seed of rational thought and critical thinking and questioning in people’s minds.”2 He didn’t explain how using lyrics from “Santa Claus Is Coming to Town” would accomplish that goal. Without an absolute standard for “good,” then being “good for goodness’ sake” is a relative concept that can be redefined by anyone.

The ads’ audience will be small, however, since a survey by the Pew Forum in February of this year found that over 90 percent of Americans are theistic, over three quarters of whom profess Christ as the Son of God.3

It’s no surprise that during the Thanksgiving and Christmas season that, rather than for “goodness’ sake,” people desire to be good for a higher reason: It was part of their original design.4

Reference

  1. Dao, C. Dawkins Supports “No God” Ads. ICR News. Posted on icr.org October 23, 2008, accessed November 12, 2008.
  2. Group’s new Christmas message: Be good, not godly. Associated Press, November 12, 2008.
  3. U.S. Religious Landscape Survey: Affiliations. Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
  4. Genesis 1:31.

* Ms. Dao is Assistant Editor.

Article posted on November 18, 2008.

The Latest
NEWS
Surprisingly Thicker Whopper Sand Best Explained by the Flood’s...
Recently, an update on the Whopper Sand in the Gulf of America (Mexico) was published in the oil field trade magazine, AAPG Explorer.1 New...

NEWS
Stolen Chloroplasts Steal the Show
Amazing tiny chloroplasts found within equally incredible plant cells continue to reveal the detailed workmanship of the Creator who created plants...

NEWS
May 2026 Wallpaper
"that you may walk worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing Him, being fruitful in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God."  (Colossians...

NEWS
Reptile Evolution Ideas Are Challenged—Again
A small fossil reptile with strange and intricate skin outgrowths has been discovered that is forcing evolutionists to once again reexamine their understanding...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Stegosaurus
Hi, kids! We created a special Acts & Facts just for you! Have fun doing the activities while learning about the wonderful world God...

ACTS & FACTS
Adaptive Trait Variation Conferred by Engineered Genetic Diversity
Global environments are highly diverse and dynamic, offering many changes and adaptive challenges to creatures. However, DNA sequence variability engineered...

ACTS & FACTS
Canyonlands National Park: A Bird's-Eye View
Certain overlooks at Canyonlands National Park in eastern Utah make you wish you could soar overhead to see and explore more crannies and canyons. Visitors...

ACTS & FACTS
Criticizing a Perfectly Engineered Eye: Evolutionists Humiliate...
Updated and modified from Guliuzza, R. J. 2016. Major Evolutionary Blunders: Evolutionists Can’t See Eye Design. Acts & Facts. 45 (10): 16–18. Robert...

ACTS & FACTS
Casting Out Doubts: The Fruits of ICR Research
Do you remember the first time that you read about Uzzah and the Ark of the Covenant (2 Samuel 6)? I read it as a young person and remember feeling...

ACTS & FACTS
Seeing Eye-to-Eye
Like all biological structures, explaining the vertebrate eye—or any eye for that matter—is a challenge to neo-Darwinism (modern synthesis)....