Is the Age of the Earth a 'Side' Issue? | The Institute for Creation Research

Is the Age of the Earth a 'Side' Issue?

Many secularists recently criticized Florida Senator Marco Rubio for not affirming, during the course of an interview, the claim that the earth is 4.5 billion years old.1

About a week later, a woman wrote to the American Christian television program The 700 Club, expressing her concerns that her sons and husband were "walking away from God" as a result of intellectual doubts about the Bible:

I have three teenage boys and now two of them are questioning the Bible. . . . They tell me if the Bible is truth then I should be able to reasonably explain the existence of dinosaurs. . . . How do I explain things to them that the Bible doesn't cover?2

Pat Robertson, the program's host, responded that the great reptiles were on the earth "before the time of the Bible." He also said the earth was more than 6,000 years old, citing radiocarbon dating and dinosaur "carcasses."2

But his response didn't address the perfectly sensible issue raised by this woman's sons: if the Bible really is God's Word, then it should provide a logical framework for explaining dinosaurs.

And the Bible does provide such a framework! Dinosaurs were created on Day Six of the creation week along with the other land animals (Genesis 1:24-25). Hence, humans would indeed have seen these great "dragons." In fact, the Bible contains detailed descriptions of two dragon-like animals in Job 40 and 41. But making sense of dinosaurs requires accepting God's Word as it's written without attempting to blend it with evolutionary and old-earth storytelling. Robertson obviously thinks that proclaiming a straightforward understanding of Genesis is likely to drive children from the Christian faith.

But young people can quickly discern intellectual inconsistency, and it is transparently inconsistent to claim to believe that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God and also accept an idea of "millions of years" that is not even hinted at in Scripture. This glaring inconsistency may actually make children question Christianity more—not less.

Moreover, the two "evidences" Robertson cited, when properly understood, actually confirm a young age for the earth. Carbon-14 (radiocarbon) decays relatively quickly, so no detectable carbon-14 should ever be present in carbon-containing specimens that are more than 100,000 years old. Yet detectable amounts of carbon-14 are routinely found in coal and natural gas samples that are supposedly many millions of years old.3

Although Robertson's mention of dinosaur "carcasses" was a garbled reference to fossilized dinosaur bones, he inadvertently touched upon the subject of "soft dinosaur tissue." Fragile organic material (such as blood cells, blood vessels, and even possible DNA) have been recovered from dinosaur fossils.4 Yet how could such fragile organic material possibly survive for tens of millions of years?

Christians tempted to dismiss the age of the earth should ask some questions: if this issue isn't really important, then why the uproar when a well-known person questions an old earth? And why are the enemies of the gospel so eager to marginalize Christians who affirm a young age for the earth?

The answer is obvious: this issue does matter for a number of reasons.5 Although the scientific data overwhelmingly favor a young age for the earth, the enemies of the gospel do have a potent weapon in their arsenal: ridicule. No one wants to be ridiculed, and Satan is shrewd enough to use a fear of ridicule to intimidate Christians from believing—and proclaiming—this vital doctrine.

References

  1. Sullivan, S. Marco Rubio: Earth's age 'one of the great mysteries.' The Washington Post. Posted on washingtonpost.com November 19, 2012, accessed December 4, 2012.
  2. Even Pat Robertson Denies the Earth is 6,000 Years Old. The 700 Club online video. Posted on youtube.com November 27, 2012, accessed December 4, 2012. 
  3. Baumgardner, J.2005. Carbon-14 Evidence for a Recent Global Flood and a Young Earth. In Vardiman, L. et al. (eds.), RATE II: Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth. San Diego, CA: Institute for Creation Research and the Creation Research Society. 
  4. Thomas, B. Dinosaur Soft Tissues: They're Real! Creation Science Update. Posted on icr.org August 11, 2009, accessed December 4, 2012. 
  5. Cosner, L. and G. Bates. Did God create over billions of years? And why is it important? Creation Ministries International. Posted on creaton.com October 6, 2011, accessed December 5, 2012.

* Dr. Hebert is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and received his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Texas at Dallas.

Article posted on December 7, 2012.

The Latest
NEWS
Chemical Clues Raise Questions About Early Animals
What if a simple sea sponge could spark a debate about the origin of animal life? A recent study suggests that some of Earth’s earliest animals...

NEWS
Alive with Christ
“Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him: knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death...

NEWS
April 2026 Wallpaper
"Ask the Lord for rain in the time of the latter rain. The Lord will make flashing clouds; He will give them showers of rain, Grass in the field...

NEWS
Does Earth Have a Twin?
A possible Earth-like planet 146 light-years away has recently been discovered by citizen scientists.1 The evolutionary community is cautiously...

NEWS
Giant Virus, Big Claims: Does Ushikuvirus Explain Complex Life?
A newly discovered giant virus called ushikuvirus has been described by conventional scientists as a possible clue to how complex cells evolved. But...

NEWS
Conventional Science Still Struggling to Exhume the Great Unconformity
The book of Genesis tells us about a global flood that occurred about 4,500 years ago, an event that began with the bursting of the fountains of the...

NEWS
Designed to Handle Oxygen: Lessons from Asgard Archaea
Oxygen gives cells energy. But oxygen can also harm cells. Any organism that uses oxygen must both harness the power and protect itself against being...

NEWS
New Species of Spinosaurus Supports Flood Catastrophe
Many people are fascinated with dinosaur discoveries—a new fossil, a new species, and the impressive size. But whenever we read a news article,...

NEWS
Adaptation Without Innovation: Rethinking Mutations and Design
What if mutations that seem helpful today become harmful tomorrow? That question sits at the center of a new genetics study published in Nature Ecology...

NEWS
More Soft Tissue in Archaeopteryx
Was the famous extinct fossil named Archaeopteryx a bird or an evolutionary link that led to birds? And how confident should scientists and others feel...