Endocrine System Evolution: A Textbook Example?

A student of zoology would be surprised to learn that, although researchers know much about the function of our endocrine system, they know essentially nothing about its supposed evolution.1

The creationist sees the incredible detail of the living world as part of God’s plan, purpose, and special design. Indeed, the various systems (e.g., digestive, muscular, circulatory, endocrine, etc.) of the human body working together is called homoeostasis, meaning the body is designed to maintain itself in a state of stable, healthy equilibrium.

The endocrine system is a complex arrangement of ductless glands that secrete hormones into the bloodstream. Hormones are regulatory substances (i.e., chemical messengers such as insulin and prolactin) produced by specially designed cells and are effective in low concentrations. As you read this article, dozens of hormones are flowing in your bloodstream—and these hormones are designed to impact only the cells that have special receptor molecules on their surfaces. If the matching receptor molecules are not on a given cell’s surface, the corresponding hormones do not affect that cell. Most of these receptor molecules are called G protein coupled receptors. God designed them to “sense” molecules (such as hormones or odors) outside the cell and activate special pathways inside the cell, resulting in a specific response.

The endocrine system is nothing short of fantastically complicated, and scientists are learning more about it every day. With each function and pathway elucidated, evolutionary explanations make less and less sense.

A 2013 zoology textbook by Stephen Miller and John Harley discussed the “evolution of endocrine systems.” With students and the public being overwhelmed daily with “the fact of evolution,” the authors committed just 220 words to endocrine system evolution! They wrote, “Endocrine systems could only arise following the evolution of circulatory systems that could carry hormones.”2 And they did not discuss “the evolution of circulatory systems” at all. They have, however, an evolution-based diagram that shows the “phylogenetic [evolutionary] trends in the circulatory systems of animals” (Figure 26.6).3 To the left of the diagram are black solid lines connecting the major groups of animals (e.g., mammals, birds, crocodilians, most reptiles, etc.). At the point where the solid lines meet one another, the name of the ethereal transitional animal is absent. To the right of these major animal groups is listed the kind of heart each group supposedly had. But these charts and descriptions do not address circulatory system evolution.

Returning to endocrine systems evolution, the authors simply wrote “that endocrine systems arose multiple times.” But they do not discuss how endocrine systems actually evolved. They do appeal to “a shared set of basic signal transduction mechanisms involved in paracrine communication [a type of cell-to-cell communication] in ancestral animals,” but this is hardly an explanation.2 How exactly did this intricate cell-to-cell communication evolve? “Basic signal transduction” is an oxymoron, since transduction is incredibly complex. Readers are invited to look this up online or in a recent physiology text, but they will not be able to find the names of these “ancestral animals” since they do not exist.

Miller and Harley also used two well-worn words that are ubiquitous in evolutionary literature and explain nothing: “over time.” Darwinists often use generous portions of “time” to gloss over macroevolutionary problems—but this is not evidence for evolution. The zoology student is left knowing less about endocrine system evolution than he or she did before reading those cryptic 220 words.

The similarities of function and structure of vertebrate circulatory systems (including hearts) and endocrine systems reflect that they all have the same wonderful Creator. Truly, His amazing work is “clearly seen” in all of His creation (Romans 1:20).


  1. Even more surprising, this statement can be made regarding virtually every biological system in people and animals.
  2. Miller, S. and J. Harley. 2013. Zoology, 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 479.
  3. Ibid, 487.

* Mr. Sherwin is Research Associate, Senior Lecturer, and Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: Sherwin, F. 2013. Endocrine System Evolution: A Textbook Example? Acts & Facts. 42 (9): 15.

The Latest
A Firm Foundation
Hello, I’m Don Barber, Director of Enterprise Technology at ICR. After serving here in a variety of roles for many years, I’m so glad to...

Data Leads to Correct Post-Flood Boundary
For decades, creation scientists have debated the level at which the Flood ended in the rock record. In the past, many have based their conclusions...

More Problems with Iconic Milankovitch Paper
Secular scientists have a difficult time explaining an Ice Age, even though there is strong geological evidence that one occurred. In fact, creation...

More Evidence Lucy Was Just an Ape
Certain evolutionary scientists have talked of Lucy since the 1970s as a supposed ape-like ancestor of humans. It’s probably the world’s...

Sixtymile Formation Part of Genesis Flood
For many decades, creation scientists have included the Sixtymile Formation in Grand Canyon as part of the Sauk Megasequence that marks the onset of...