Journal Reports Bias in Human-Chimp Studies | The Institute for Creation Research

Journal Reports Bias in Human-Chimp Studies

Two reports in the Journal of Creation (JOC) provide a current review and refutation of the “nearly identical” human-chimpanzee DNA similarity paradigm.1,2 Creation biologist Dr. Jerry Bergman and I authored these papers after the Answers Research Journal (ARJ) published results from the ICR research project detailing large-scale genome-wide DNA alignments between human and chimpanzee.3 Additionally, several ARJ papers published earlier in 2011 describe how the chimpanzee genome was sequenced and assembled—another important aspect of the DNA similarity paradigm.4,5 This significant group of research papers represents a fairly thorough refutation of the claim that humans and chimpanzees have nearly identical genomes and marks an important phase in ICR’s research program in the biological sciences.

The first of the recent JOC papers reviews secular science literature associated with the common claim that chimpanzees and humans are nearly identical. This analysis took the published secular claims at face value and showed that many differences exist in regard to not only genomic DNA, but also to gene regulation, regulatory DNA features, microRNA code, and gene splicing. Multiple types of DNA sequence and genetic mechanisms reported in the standard scientific literature clearly show that major genetic differences exist between humans and chimps—features clearly predicted by the creation model outlined in the book of Genesis.

The second paper examines the research methods and discarded data reported in an assortment of key secular human-chimp DNA research publications. All analyzed cases of reported high human-chimp DNA sequence similarity are based on biased data selection and exclusion techniques. DNA sequence data that are too dissimilar to be conveniently aligned are omitted, masked, or completely excluded. Furthermore, gap data within DNA sequence alignments are typically omitted, further biasing similarity estimates.

These highly selective data-discarding techniques, fueled by Darwinian dogma, lead to the commonly claimed 98 percent similarity in DNA between human and chimp. Based on the reanalysis of DNA similarity estimates using discarded data in leading secular research publications, it is safe to conclude that genome-wide DNA similarity between human and chimpanzee is not more than 81 to 87 percent identical. These numbers are in good agreement with the range of estimates obtained by ICR’s independent research.3

One must keep in mind that the chimpanzee genome is larger than the human genome by at least 8 percent (based on current data). Also, many non-similar regions of DNA between the human and chimpanzee genomes cannot be accurately compared due to high levels of dissimilarity. Therefore, overall genome similarity between human and chimpanzee is most likely lower than 81 percent.

References

  1. Bergman, J. and J. Tomkins. 2012. Is the Human Genome Nearly Identical to Chimpanzee? A Reassessment of the Literature. Journal of Creation. 26(1): 54-60.
  2. Tomkins, J. and J. Bergman. 2012. Genomic monkey business—estimates of nearly identical human-chimp DNA similarity re-evaluated using omitted data. Journal of Creation. 26(1): 94-100.
  3. Tomkins, J. 2011. Genome-Wide DNA Alignment Similarity (Identity) for 40,000 Chimpanzee DNA Sequences Queried against the Human Genome is 86-89%. Answers Research Journal. 4: 233-241.
  4. Tomkins, J. 2011. How Genomes Are Sequenced and Why It Matters. Answers Research Journal. 4: 81-88.
  5. Tomkins, J. 2011. Response to Comments on “How Genomes are Sequenced and Why it Matters: Implications for Studies in Comparative Genomics of Humans and Chimpanzees.” Answers Research Journal. 4: 161-162.

* Dr. Tomkins is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and received his Ph.D. in Genetics from Clemson University.

Cite this article: Tomkins, J. 2012. Journal Reports Bias in Human-Chimp Studies. Acts & Facts. 41 (6): 6.

The Latest
NEWS
November Wallpaper
"Consider the ravens, for they neither sow nor reap, which have neither storehouse nor barn; and God feeds them. Of how much more value are you...

NEWS
Watching PBS: Where’s the Beef?
In the mid-1980s, a United States fast-food hamburger chain ran a series of television ads with the slogan, “Where’s the beef?” The...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Chocolate
Hi, kids! We created a special Acts & Facts page just for you! Have fun doing the activities while learning about the wonderful world...

APOLOGETICS
Theism: The Only Way to Go(d)
Countless religious writings and ruins confirm that humans can’t help but worship something or someone. Should we worship Thor, Jesus, Molech,...

ACTS & FACTS
More Than We Knew
Years ago, I visited Israel. Like many believers, I expected the experience would deepen my appreciation for Scripture. What I didn’t expect was...

ACTS & FACTS
Stasis in the Fossil Record: Life That Remains the Same
“You need to learn everything about living insects—they are just like the ones we find in the fossil record!” I still remember hearing...

ACTS & FACTS
Polonium Radiohalos: Strong Evidence Against Millions of Years
The yearlong Genesis Flood deposited the world’s sedimentary rocks about 4,500 years ago, killing and entombing billions of living things...

ACTS & FACTS
New River Gorge National Park and Preserve: How to Slice a Mountain...
by Brian Thomas, Ph.D., and Tim Clarey, Ph.D.* The New River flows 230 miles across southern West Virginia—the only state in the Union whose...

ACTS & FACTS
Engineered Biology: Directly Countering Evolutionary Biology
A longtime advocate for creationism once asked me for an easy way to understand how a theory of biological design (TOBD) fits in the big picture...

NEWS
Computer Simulations Imply Recent, Supernatural Creation of Saturn's...
Conventional scenarios fall short in explaining the origin of moons within our solar system. Recent computer simulations have strengthened the argument...