Scavenging vs. Sowing | The Institute for Creation Research

Scavenging vs. Sowing

Our readers probably experience the same problem I do. Each day’s mail—both at the office and at home—contains a fair number of earnest appeals for donations. No doubt many of these are worthy of support, but I find the sheer volume tiresome, and I admit I often don’t read them.

The same is true for telephone solicitations. Even with my number registered with the national “do not call” list, telemarketers always seem to call at dinnertime. I now routinely screen my calls and even turn the ringer off on occasion, particularly during political campaigns! I suspect most of you can relate.

In the past I tried to evaluate all such appeals carefully, and I have given to many of them. But my small gifts always seemed to quickly multiply into further appeals—not only from the organizations I gave to but also from many others I had never heard of. This is known as “scavenging,” the practice of purchasing mailing lists from other groups in order to send frequent appeals to more people. The idea is that the larger the scavenging area, the more you take in. I suspect there is some wisdom in this approach, but it might turn off many who may be truly concerned about the needs in question.

Whatever the cause, these appeal letters are often written by professional fundraising organizations that receive a substantial percentage of the scavenging results as part of their compensation. Their appeals typically contain touching stories and emotional pleas peppered with highlighted text, frequent underlining, and plenty of exclamation points (!!!). This approach must work for many organizations, and perhaps when the mission is for a worthy cause the end does justify the means. But we have never felt ICR should operate this way.

ICR obviously needs significant financial support to function, and most of this must come from concerned believers on our mailing list. However, we’ve always focused more on “sowing” in the lives of believers than on “scavenging” for potential donors. Our approach has certain distinctions that we believe are soundly biblical.

As we faithfully seek to honor God and His Word, we are confident He will supply our needs. Tweet: As we faithfully seek to honor God and His Word, we are confident He will supply our needs. https://www.icr.org/article/10240/ @icrscience

ICR does not buy, borrow, or rent mailing lists from other organizations, nor do we allow others to buy, borrow, or rent ours—even though this would be highly profitable. Everyone on our subscription list, as far as we know, has personally requested to be on it and is directly interested in ICR’s ministry. And judging from the wonderful testimonies we receive after each issue of Acts & Facts and Days of Praise, many people have been helped or blessed by these free publications.

ICR never uses telephone solicitors. And we usually send only one or two appeal letters each year (rather than the average of six or more!), and even then we only contact those whom we have not heard from in a while. Most notably, our policy is not to go into debt. Consequently, we never have to make urgent “shipwreck” appeals.

Lastly, ICR sends gifts—usually a recent book or DVD—to our special partners and to every donor at Christmas that we hope will bless their personal ministry. We include a short letter expressing our gratefulness for our supporters. Its final paragraph contains a sentence or two about our financial needs and asks our supporters to consider ICR in their giving plans as the Lord leads.

And that’s it.

In spite of this low-key approach, God has blessed these policies and ICR’s ministry for nearly five decades. We see no need to scavenge anyone’s mailing list for support and would much rather sow in the hearts and minds of fellow believers to encourage their faith in Christ. As long as we faithfully seek to honor God and His Word, we are confident He will supply our needs through His people to accomplish the work He wants us to do.

* Mr. Morris is Director of Donor Relations at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: Henry M. Morris IV. 2017. Scavenging vs. Sowing. Acts & Facts. 46 (10).

The Latest
NEWS
May 2026 Wallpaper
"that you may walk worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing Him, being fruitful in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God."  (Colossians...

NEWS
Reptile Evolution Ideas Are Challenged—Again
A small fossil reptile with strange and intricate skin outgrowths has been discovered that is forcing evolutionists to once again reexamine their understanding...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Stegosaurus
Hi, kids! We created a special Acts & Facts just for you! Have fun doing the activities while learning about the wonderful world God...

ACTS & FACTS
Adaptive Trait Variation Conferred by Engineered Genetic Diversity
Global environments are highly diverse and dynamic, offering many changes and adaptive challenges to creatures. However, DNA sequence variability engineered...

ACTS & FACTS
Canyonlands National Park: A Bird's-Eye View
Certain overlooks at Canyonlands National Park in eastern Utah make you wish you could soar overhead to see and explore more crannies and canyons. Visitors...

ACTS & FACTS
Criticizing a Perfectly Engineered Eye: Evolutionists Humiliate...
Updated and modified from Guliuzza, R. J. 2016. Major Evolutionary Blunders: Evolutionists Can’t See Eye Design. Acts & Facts. 45 (10): 16–18. Robert...

ACTS & FACTS
Casting Out Doubts: The Fruits of ICR Research
Do you remember the first time that you read about Uzzah and the Ark of the Covenant (2 Samuel 6)? I read it as a young person and remember feeling...

ACTS & FACTS
Seeing Eye-to-Eye
Like all biological structures, explaining the vertebrate eye—or any eye for that matter—is a challenge to neo-Darwinism (modern synthesis)....

APOLOGETICS
Essential Training: A New Series
I teamed up with friends from ICR and Eric Hovind of Creation Today for some campus outreach at two Dallas-area universities just a couple months ago....

NEWS
Grand Canyon Carved by Flood Runoff, Not Lake Spillover
A paper was recently published in Science that suggested a lake may have helped carve Grand Canyon.1 This hypothesis has been scattered throughout...