Why Can Moss Process Human Genes? | The Institute for Creation Research
Why Can Moss Process Human Genes?

Researchers used to think that no plant could process mammalian genes because the required machinery is “proprietary,” or unique to the kind. But a team from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology found that a particular moss plant was able to manufacture proteins from human genes that had been inserted into its genome.1 Though they referred to it as an “evolutionary relic,” the scientists either have to believe that this ability inexplicably lay dormant and unchanged in moss for 450 million years, or that the same coordinated suite of cellular machinery evolved twice.

In their study published in Plant Biotechnology Journal, the researchers found that certain moss cells possess “native and synthetic promoters and polyadenylation sites, viral and cellular internal ribosome entry sites, secretion signal peptides and secreted product proteins, and synthetic transactivators and transrepressors,”2 all compatible with mammal genes and incompatible with other plant genes.

According to evolution, plants diverged from some “protoplant” long ago and should therefore all have similar gene processing tools. But the mechanisms in the moss are very different from those of other plants. It is as if there was a single designer who intentionally integrated whole, intact gene processing modules into various organisms.

This moss adds to a rapidly growing list of features that appear in mosaic patterns, in which otherwise disparate creatures demonstrate shared characteristics. For example, “we find hemoglobin [the oxygen carrying pigment in red blood cells] in nearly all vertebrates, but we also find it in some annelids (the earthworm group), some echinoderms (the starfish group), some mollusks (the clam group), some arthropods (the insect group), and even in some bacteria!”3 Another feature that appears integrated into wildly different forms is the single refracting lens eyeball. Known as the “vertebrate eye” because it is found in most vertebrates, the same basic eye design is also fully formed in cephalopods such as the pearly chambered nautilus, which resembles a small squid with a pearly spiral shell.4

These mosaic features do not have clear Darwinian tree-like patterns of descendants and are always found fully integrated into distinct organisms instead of in partly-evolved transitional forms. If living kinds were created by God’s ingenious engineering as the Bible describes, then certainly more examples of widely-scattered shared biological modules like hemoglobin, “vertebrate eyes,” and “mammalian” gene processing suites will emerge.

References

  1. Schaffner, M. Moss can produce human proteins. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich press release, May 5, 2009.
  2. Gitzinger, M. et al. 2009. Functional cross-kingdom conservation of mammalian and moss (Physcomitrella patens) transcription, translation and secretion machineries. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 7 (1): 73-86.
  3. Parker, G. 2006. Creation: Facts of Life. Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 48.
  4. The pearly chambered nautilus is known as a “living fossil” because its remains are found in the lowermost paleosystem, the Cambrian, in the Geologic Column Diagram. It is not represented in higher strata, and it lives in oceans today with the same body design. Thus, this eye design existed fully formed right from the start with no fossil evidence of evolutionary transitions.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on June 16, 2009.

The Latest
CREATION PODCAST
These Animals Are Masters of Disguise | The Creation Podcast:...
From the leopard's spots to the butterfly's wings, many of our planet's creatures possess the ability to hide in plain sight. Where did...

NEWS
Do Fish Skulls Show Evolution?
Fish never learned to walk. Regardless, an evolutionary paleontologist suggested an undocumented scenario of how fish gradually evolved into four-legged...

ACTS & FACTS
Honoring Pioneers of Creation
It’s always fun to catch up with old friends. We recently asked some pioneers of the creation movement to share with us where they are in their...

ACTS & FACTS
Henry M. Morris and Duane T. Gish: Advancing the Cause of Christ
    The following excerpts by Dr. Henry Morris and Dr. Duane Gish were taken from the first issue of the Creation-Science...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer Don DeYoung
I first met Dr. Henry Morris in 1973 when he spoke in chapel at Grace College in Winona Lake, Indiana. With a growing interest in creation studies,...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer Larry Vardiman
Larry and Jeannette Vardiman   During my second year in graduate school at Colorado State University, I received a phone call...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer David Coppedge
David Coppedge   I’ve lived in Santa Clarita, California, since 1992, but I grew up in the San Fernando Valley. My parents...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer Russell Humphreys
Russell Humphreys   After I retired in 2008 from being an associate professor for the Institute for Creation Research, I moved...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer Gary Parker
Gary Parker   In rural south Florida where I grew up (Arcadia, DeSoto County), where my wife, Mary, and I had the first of our...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Pioneer John Baumgardner
My wife, Mary, and I currently live in central Virginia near Lynchburg and Liberty University, where I serve as research professor emeritus in the School...