Three-Dimensional DNA Code Defies Evolution | The Institute for Creation Research

Three-Dimensional DNA Code Defies Evolution

Scientists have long been baffled as to what actually tells proteins called transcription factors (TFs) where to bind in the genome to turn genes off and on. However, new research incorporating the three-dimensional shape of DNA has revealed an incredibly complex system of interacting biochemical codes.1

We know that genes are turned off and on across the genome by intricate networks of transcription factors which bind to DNA in strategic places in and around the genes. But discovering what tells the transcription factors where to bind has proven extremely difficult.

Traditionally, researchers have focused on finding out which DNA sequences bind with which transcription factors, thinking there may be a consistent pattern. However, this approach has proven only mildly successful because any given transcription factor will bind to a diversity of different DNA sequences. This is despite the fact that their DNA binding is highly tissue specific and tightly regulated. In fact, the authors of the current paper stated, "Underlying mechanisms that explain the highly specific binding of TFs to their genomic target sites are poorly understood."

But the new research has revealed that two main things influence how DNA is read by transcription factors:

  1. the actual sequence of the DNA and,
  2. the conformational shape of the DNA as it's being read.

The sequence of these binding sites has been fairly easy to determine by sequencing the fragments of DNA bound to specific transcription factors. But uncovering the second factor affecting binding (the DNA's 3D shape) has been no small task.

DNA is a double-stranded string of four different molecules called nucleotide bases (represented by the letters A, T, G, and C). The interdependence between nucleotide positions stems from the physical interactions between base pairs. These interactions give rise to the 3D structure of DNA which in turn helps transcription factors recognize specific sites for binding.2 Researchers in the present study observe that, "To date, a systematic and comprehensive survey of the value of shape-based models of DNA recognition has been lacking."1

The scientists used extensive data from large studies that assessed the protein binding biochemistry of transcription factors to DNA, as well as information gained from new biochemical investigations. They also had to employ a complex system of algorithm development using a technique called statistical machine learning to assess all the data. All three sources of information enabled them to develop a new binding model—one that considered DNA shape in addition to DNA sequence. When they tested their model against the standard model of using DNA sequence by itself, the new system greatly outperformed the standard model.

Past news reports have shown that multiple genome codes were contained in the same linear stretch of DNA sequences and accomplished different functions.3,4 Now we can add yet another type of code that is not based solely on DNA sequence, but rather the actual 3D shape of the DNA. A linear code plus a 3D code work together to tell the gene expression machinery precisely where to bind, turning genes off and on.

Yet another noteworthy feature of this new report is the fact that the failed theory of evolution was not given any credit whatsoever for accomplishing any of this amazing complexity. Obviously, to do so would have been utterly absurd—a type of oxymoron. The clear deduction from this surprising discovery—which required a combination of complex biochemistry and interpretive computer algorithms—is that an omnipotent Creator engineered it all in the beginning.


  1. Zhou, T., et al. 2015. Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (15): 4654–4659.
  2. Rohs, R., et al. 2009. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature. 461 (7268): 1248–1253.
  3. Tomkins, J. 2014. Duons: Parallel Gene Code Defies Evolution. Creation Science Update. Posted on January 6, 2014, accessed April 14, 2015.
  4. Tomkins, J. 2014. Dual-Gene Codes Defy Evolution...Again. Creation Science Update. Posted on September 12, 2014, accessed April 14, 2015.

*Dr. Tomkins is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and received his Ph.D. in Genetics from Clemson University.

Article posted on April 27, 2015.

The Latest
Continuous Environmental Tracking : An Engineering-Based Model...
Purpose The Institute for Creation Research is engaged in our biggest science initiative in the last two decades, and it could be our most important...

CET: Testing the Cavefish Model
Staff Writer Purpose The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is testing an engineering- based model of rapid biological adaptation called...

Original Biochemistry in Fossils
Purpose In 1997, paleontologist Dr. Mary Schweitzer accidentally stumbled upon what appeared to be blood vessels and blood cells from a T. rex...

Debunking an Iconic Uniformitarian Ice Age Theory
Purpose The Milankovitch, or astronomical, theory holds that the timing of Ice Ages is controlled by slow changes in Earth’s orbital and...

ICR and Explaining the Ice Age
Purpose There is strong geological evidence for an Ice Age, so the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) has always been interested in explaining...

Planetary Magnetism
Purpose In 1971, Dr. Thomas Barnes publicized a then “trade secret” of scientists studying the earth’s magnetic field, which...

Cosmology Research
Purpose Taking the Hebrew text of Scripture at face value without inserting gaps or revising the meanings, the universe is only about 6,000 years...

The Coconino Sandstone: Water, not Wind
Purpose The Coconino Sandstone is one of the most well-known formations in Grand Canyon. The blond-colored sandstone, just three layers down from...

Global Stratigraphy Supports a Progressive Worldwide Flood
Purpose Is there geological evidence for a global flood? Is there evidence that the waters rose and peaked on Day 150 as recorded in Genesis 8?...

Human-Chimp DNA Similarity Research Refutes Evolution
Purpose An oft-repeated claim of evolutionary propaganda is that the DNA of chimpanzees and humans is 98.5% identical. This high level of DNA...