Let’s say you recorded a library of books onto DNA. Hundreds of books could fit on your fingertip, but how would you find the one book you wanted?
As it stands, digital data occupy hard drives stacked in stadium-sized exabyte data centers that cost a billion dollars to build and run. DNA appeals as a more stable and, someday, cheaper data storage vehicle, excepting one important hurdle: how to retrieve that needle in a DNA stack.
In an ingenious feat, researchers from MIT and NC State crafted a way to organize and retrieve DNA—the most information-dense data storage medium in the universe. And their feat leads us to ask how countless plant and animal cells silently and effortlessly retrieve just the right information like these researchers did. It’s easier to appreciate technical solutions when one tries to reengineer them.
Publishing in Nature Materials,1 senior author and MIT biological engineer Mark Bathe led a team that encapsulated DNA data files “into a 6-micrometer particle of silica.”2 They then added DNA tags to identify each file, like barcodes on supermarket products.
Their proof-of-concept file retrieval system works differently—and much more crudely—than the complicated data call-up protocols that living cells use. Cell systems can put files in deep storage, pull out just the right files at the right time and in the right tissues during embryonic development or in response to important needs, extract files repeatedly and automatically, and position its most-often used DNA nearest the cell’s DNA-reading machines—just for starters.3
It’s like each cell uses a suite of miniaturized robot librarians who never cease their choreography. If it took ingenious engineering to make tiny-yet-simple silica particle organizers, what about the far superior engineering that went into cells?
Thoughts along these lines can change minds. For example, Marcos Eberlin, who added his name to 1,000 others who signed a Dissent from Darwinism, told the Discovery Institute, “As a biochemist I became skeptical about Darwinism when I was confronted with the extreme intricacy of the genetic code and its many most intelligent strategies to code, decode, and protect its information.”4
We can do more than merely doubt Darwinism in light of the extreme superiority of cellular as opposed to man-made DNA data retrieval systems. The newfound clarity offers a fresh reason to credit and praise the Lord Jesus Christ, who is “upholding all things by the word of His power” (Hebrews 1:3).
1. Banal, J.L., et al. 2021. Random access DNA memory using Boolean search in an archival file storage system. Nature Materials.
2. Trafton, A. Could all your digital photos be stored as DNA? MIT News. Posted on news.mit.edu June 10, 2021, accessed June 10, 2021.
3. Thomas, B. 2010. Cell systems—what’s under the hood continues to drop jaws. Journal of Creation. 24(2): 13-15.
4. Skepticism About Darwinian Evolution Grows as 1,000+ Scientists Share Their Doubts. Evolution News. Posted on evolutionnews.org February 4, 2019, accessed July 14, 2021.
*Dr. Brian Thomas is a Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in paleobiochemistry from the University of Liverpool.
Latest DNA Tech Still Light-Years Behind
What Happened with Washington's Violent Volcano? | The Creation...
How did a 1980 volcanic eruption change our understanding of geology? What impact did this event have on the age assignments of sediments? Join us for...
Fossil Insect Predation Shows No Evidence of Evolution
Some recent science news stories have come out describing fossils of insects feeding on plants supposedly many “millions of years ago.” What...
Dr. Tim Clarey Awarded Adjunct Professor of the Year
Congratulations to ICR Research Scientist and geologist Dr. Tim Clarey! He received the Adjunct Professor of the Year award from King’s University,...
Darwin or Design? CET Pt. 2 | The Creation Podcast: Episode 22
How does design provide a better explanation for biological functions and adaptations than natural selection? And how can engineering principles help...