How Do Hominids Fit with the Bible? | The Institute for Creation Research
How Do Hominids Fit with the Bible?

A recent survey showed that the most persuasive argument for evolution comes from the iconic drawing of the apes-to-man parade.1 This popular picture illustrates ape-like animals evolving into a human. If this image reflects actual history, then the history in Genesis is wrong. If we came from apes, then we didn’t come from Adam and Eve. That also casts doubt on the other Scriptures—and their human authors—that refer to Adam as our real ancestor.2 Do certain fossils demand we take scissors to our Bibles?

Scientific literature and popular media portray hominids as people-like apes or ape-like people on their way to becoming real humans. Over the last 50 years of looking into human origins, ICR scientists have found that hominid fossils fit three creation-friendly groups that leave the biblical Adam intact.

The first group is ape. The fossil nicknamed Lucy is probably the most famous so-called hominid in this category. Lucy’s kind had locking wrists and ape-like fingers, arms, and ribs, with ape jaws and teeth. Why not just call them apes? Their discoverer and promoter Donald Johanson has claimed since 1974 that Lucy’s kind was becoming human. But others, like the late Baron Solly Zuckerman, saw them as mere apes with no human ancestry.3 These fossils rightly bear the ape name Australopithecus.

Apes in this group are often made to look more human-like than they really were. In the 1970s, fans of human evolution assigned fossil human tracks at Laetoli, Tanzania, to Lucy’s kind. That was easier back when australopith fossil finds contained too few foot fragments to figure out what its feet looked like. Since then, scientists have found australopiths with feet, and these new fossils confirm its ape grouping by showing it had hands for feet just like chimps do.4 What threat does an extinct ape pose to Genesis history? None. Evolution needs natural processes to create new kinds, not kill off old ones.

A more recent candidate named Australopithecus sediba fits a second group. When it was first described in 2011, Texas A&M University’s Darryl DeRuiter told ABC News, “This is what evolutionary theory would predict, this mixture of Australopithecene and Homo….It’s strong confirmation of evolutionary theory.”5 But other scientists took a closer look and found the real reason for “this mixture.” Sediba did not combine different features but different species. Like the famous Piltdown forgery,6 Sediba belongs to an imaginary group.7 Human parts placed beside Lucy parts pose no threat to our ancestry in Adam.

The third group is human. Which fossils belong here? Sometimes it’s tough to tell. Healthy human heads can take more different shapes and sizes than most other creatures God made. Some ancient human skulls look a bit like apes, but no more so than some folks alive today.

Homo floresiensis (nicknamed “Hobbit”) presented a challenge. The skull and other fragments from a remote island in Indonesia came from a small person with a tiny head. Initial reports declared it a possible ancestor, but later work showed an excellent match between Hobbit and people today who have microcephaly.8,9 Diseased humans don’t show evolution, just sin’s curse on creation.

So far, no fossil fits human evolution. Whether ape, imaginary, or human, fossils confirm created kinds and Adam in our not-so-distant past.

References

  1. Biddle, D. A. and J. Bergman. 2017. Strategically dismantling the evolutionary idea strongholds. Journal of Creation. 31 (1): 116-119.
  2. The complete list includes Genesis, Deuteronomy, Joshua, 1 Chronicles, Job, Ezekiel, Luke, Romans, 1 Corinthians, 1 Timothy, and Jude.
  3. Roger Lewin wrote about Zuckerman: “‘They are just bloody apes,’ he is reputed to have observed on examining the australopithecine remains in South Africa.” Lewin, R. 1987. Bones of Contention. New York: Touchstone, 165.
  4. DeSilva, J. M. et al. 2018. A nearly complete foot from Dikika, Ethiopia and its implications for the ontogeny and function of Australopithecus afarensis. Science Advances. 4 (7): eaar7723.
  5. Potter, N. Evolutionary ‘Game Changer’: Fossil May Be Human Ancestor. ABC News. Posted on abcnews.go.com September 8, 2011, accessed February 11, 2020.
  6. To manufacture Piltdown man as an evolutionary ancestor, someone filed down and stained an ape jaw to make it fit a human cranium.
  7. Ann Gibbons wrote, “‘The best candidate’ for the immediate ancestor of our genus Homo may just be a pretender.” Gibbons, A. A famous ‘ancestor’ may be ousted from the human family. Science. Posted on sciencemag.org April 23, 2017, accessed February 11, 2020.
  8. Hershkovitz, I., L. Kornreich, and Z. Laron. 2007. Comparative Skeletal Features Between Homo floresiensis and Patients With Primary Growth Hormone Insensitivity (Laron Syndrome). American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 134 (2): 198-208.
  9. Martin, R. D. et al. 2006. Flores Hominid: New Species or Microcephalic Dwarf? The Anatomical Record Part A. 288A (11): 1123-1145.

* Dr. Thomas is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in paleobiochemistry from the University of Liverpool.

Cite this article: Brian Thomas, Ph.D. 2020. How Do Hominids Fit with the Bible?. Acts & Facts. 49 (5).

The Latest
ACTS & FACTS
Thankful Remembrance
We all have so much to be thankful for. Even after such a trying year, we must admit that God has been so very good to us. The Lord has not only shown...

APOLOGETICS
Mayflower Pilgrims, Simian DNA, and Straw Men
Both the Mayflower Pilgrims and biblical creationists are unjustly targeted for straw man vilifications using misleading, false accusations. A straw...

ACTS & FACTS
How Can You Refute Evolution?
Darwinian evolution promotes a mantra that “all creatures great and small—natural processes made them all.” Just one creature somehow...

ACTS & FACTS
Hummingbirds by Design
Zoologists have wonder and appreciation for the animals they investigate, whether the creatures fly through air, swim in water, or walk on land. Stanford...

ACTS & FACTS
Science vs. Falsely Called Knowledge
Guard what was committed to your trust, avoiding the profane and idle babblings and contradictions of what is falsely called knowledge—by professing...

ACTS & FACTS
Claims of 100-Million-Year-Old Bacteria Unfounded
Evolutionary scientists recently claimed to have discovered bacteria that are 101.5 million years old. In 2010 researchers collected deep-sea sediment...

ACTS & FACTS
Paleontology Confirms a Late Cenozoic N-Q Flood Boundary
Jeffrey P. Tomkins, Ph.D., and Tim Clarey, Ph.D. Extensive rock record research performed by ICR geologist Dr. Tim Clarey across four continents...

RESEARCH
Soft Tissue Fossils Reveal Incriminating Trends
In December 2019, the journal Expert Review of Proteomics published a paper I authored with Stephen Taylor titled “Proteomes of the past: the...

ACTS & FACTS
The Power of the Next Idea
“Our task is to fundamentally change the way people understand biology by constructing a completely new theory of biological design that incorporates...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation by Design
Take a quick look at the hummingbird pictured below. This tiny bird’s wings beat from 50 to 80 times per second—a testimony to God’s...